Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Increased CO2 Emissions Will Delay Next Ice Age ( And that is a good thing!)
watts up with that? ^ | January 8, 2012 | Anthony Watts

Posted on 01/08/2012 9:21:33 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Sir Fred Hoyle Vindicated
(Via Dr. Benny Peiser of the GWPF)
According to new research to be published in Nature Geoscience  (embargoed until 1800 GMT/10AM PST, Sunday 8 January 2012), the next ice age could set in any time
this millennium where it not for increases in anthropogenic CO2 emissions that are preventing such a global disaster from occurring.

The new research confirms the theory developed by the late Sir Fred Hoyle and Professor Chandra Wickramasinghe in the 1990s that without increased levels of CO2 emissions into the atmosphere ‘the drift into new ice-age conditions would be inevitable.’

Hoyle and Wickramasinghe published their controversial idea in CCNet in July 1999:

CCNet-ESSAY: ON THE CAUSE OF ICE-AGES

Fred Hoyle

 

Sir Fred Hoyle - Image via Wikipedia

http://abob.libs.uga.edu/bobk/ccc/ce120799.html

By Fred Hoyle and Chandra Wickramasinghe

[...] The problem for the present swollen human species is of a drift back into an ice-age, not away from an ice-age. Manifestly, we need all the greenhouse we can get, even to the extent of the British Isles becoming good for the growing of vines….

The renewal of ice-age conditions would render a large fraction of the world’s major food-growing areas inoperable, and so would inevitably lead to the extinction of most of the present human population. Since bolide impacts cannot be called up to order, we must look to a sustained greenhouse effect to maintain the present advantageous world climate. This implies the ability to inject effective greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, the opposite of what environmentalists are erroneously advocating. …

Full paper available here:

http://abob.libs.uga.edu/bobk/ccc/ce120799.html

(Excerpt) Read more at wattsupwiththat.com ...


TOPICS: Astronomy; Business/Economy; Conspiracy; Science; Weather
KEYWORDS: 199907; agw; astronomy; climatechange; climategate; climategate2; environmentalists; fredhoyle; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; hoyle; panspermia; science; wickramasinghe; xplanets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 01/08/2012 9:21:44 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; landsbaum; Signalman; NormsRevenge; steelyourfaith; Lancey Howard; ...

fyi


2 posted on 01/08/2012 9:23:37 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Fat chance....The next ice age will come when it wants to.
I am sick of these faux and pseudo climate scientist.


3 posted on 01/08/2012 9:23:56 PM PST by AlexW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

104 Responses to Increased CO2 Emissions Will Delay Next Ice Age


4 posted on 01/08/2012 9:25:05 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlexW
And just posted this:

Scripps blockbuster: Ocean acidification happens all the time — naturally

5 posted on 01/08/2012 9:30:31 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach




Climate change sucks.
6 posted on 01/08/2012 9:34:21 PM PST by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Cheers!

7 posted on 01/08/2012 9:52:09 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I somewhat doubt that all the CO2 we could possibly create would keep the next ice age from happening. But it is nice to see someone talking about the other side of the climate coin re CO2 for a change. Does anyone really think that 90,000 years of bitter cold and constant raging winds is going to be a good thing?


8 posted on 01/08/2012 10:17:05 PM PST by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I seriously doubt it.


9 posted on 01/08/2012 10:41:42 PM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

10 posted on 01/08/2012 10:50:17 PM PST by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> - - -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

It’ll delay it by about, oh, a day at most.


11 posted on 01/08/2012 11:22:33 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

We’ve been in an ice age for 3 million years or so.

What’s coming is the next glaciation.

And the trivial amount of CO2 in our atmosphere is not going to delay it.


12 posted on 01/08/2012 11:26:13 PM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Since there seems to be some confusion about all this, I’ll explain it for all you scientists and activists.

It’s going to get really cold. There will be really cool things to find on the beaches as the oceans recede. We’ll all be dead of old age by then, and so will be our grandchildren and theirs.

Oh, and if you believe we didn’t land on the moon, that the WTC was imploded, or that homeopathy works, take some Thorazine.


13 posted on 01/08/2012 11:33:04 PM PST by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

One thing liberals can all agree on: We’re doomed!!!!


14 posted on 01/08/2012 11:34:10 PM PST by Rocky (REPEAL IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; ...
DOOMAGE!

Global ?Warming? PING!

You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.

Freep-mail me to get on or off: Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.

Global Warming on Free Republic

Latest from Global Warming News Site

Latest from Greenie Watch

Latest from Real Climate

Latest from Climate Depot

Latest from Junk Science

Latest from Terra Daily

15 posted on 01/09/2012 12:07:49 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Occupy DC General Assembly: We are Marxist tools. WE ARE MARXIST TOOLS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; grey_whiskers; ApplegateRanch; Whenifhow; WL-law; Berlin_Freeper; Horusra; ...
Thanx for the ping Ernest_at_the_Beach !

 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

16 posted on 01/09/2012 3:15:32 AM PST by steelyourfaith (If it's "green" ... it's crap !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Increased CO2 Emissions Will Delay Next Ice Age ( And that is a good thing!)

Well, perhaps they'll delay the next period of glaciation in the current ice age.
17 posted on 01/09/2012 3:18:19 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rocky
One thing liberals can all agree on: We’re doomed!!!!

Yeah. I remember Global Cooling in the 70s. An Ice Age was coming to kill mankind. But Global Cooling died it's death when the predictions (and computer models) failed.

After this it was Global Warming, there would be no polar bears, no snow in England and hurricanes galore hitting the United States. None of that happened, so Global Warming had to die.

Right now it's called Global Climate Change with warnings of Apocalyptic disasters in 2012.

But now, Possible Ice Age? Perhaps they are going to trot out Global Cooling again?

This reminds me of the Boy who Cried Wolf...

18 posted on 01/09/2012 3:30:32 AM PST by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The weird thing is that virtually all the effects of CO2 concentration on temperature is accomplished over the first 80-100ppm, after that it's an increasingly small effect with increasingly larger amounts of CO2. As far as its correlation with temperature change goes, four times between 60 to 20 thousand years before present, it's bumped up between 600-1200 years after an increase in warmth. But temperature can crash abruptly in the midst of higher atmospheric CO2 which then usually takes much longer to decrease afterwards. The general trend over the past 175 million years has been to an increasingly poor CO2 concentration. And over the last 500 million years, the three periods with highest atmospheric CO2 were relatively cool. Over the same 500 million years the lag between temperature increase and CO2 increase ranges between 1000-5000 years.
19 posted on 01/09/2012 3:47:06 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Since bolide impacts cannot be called up to order

Actually, they can. Our present technology is adequate to allow us to "steer" comets to impact with the earth.

Major possible negative side-effects, of course, depending on where the comet impacts.

20 posted on 01/09/2012 10:57:14 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson