Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Neanderthals wouldn't have eaten their sprouts either
PhysOrg.com ^ | August 12th, 2009 | Denholm Barnetson

Posted on 08/12/2009 11:42:29 AM PDT by decimon

They have found that a gene in modern humans that makes some people dislike a bitter chemical called phenylthiocarbamide, or PTC, was also present in Neanderthals hundreds of thousands of years ago.

The scientists made the discovery after recovering and sequencing a fragment of the TAS2R38 gene taken from 48,000-year-old Neanderthal bones found at a site in El Sidron, in northern Spain, they said in a report released Wednesday by the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC).

"This indicates that variation in bitter taste perception predates the divergence of the lineages leading to Neanderthals and modern humans," they said.

Substances similar to PTC give a bitter taste to green vegetables such as Brussels sprouts, broccoli and cabbage as well as some fruits.

But they are also present in some poisonous plants, so having a distaste for it makes evolutionary sense.

"The sense of bitter taste protects us from ingesting toxic substances," the report said.

(Excerpt) Read more at physorg.com ...


TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS: beansprouts; creation; dietandcuisine; evolution; godsgravesglyphs; neandertal; neandertals; neanderthal; neanderthaldiet; neanderthals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: ElectricStrawberry; metmom; GodGunsGuts
Neanderthal DNA is generally described as about halfway between ours and that of a chimpanzee. In fact one of the more obvious things you see in neanderthal skeletons is the rounded torso, which is common to apes but not humans.

You'd have to come up with some new hominid BETWEEN modern man and the neanderthal in both time and morphology:

...Those who traced the evolution of modern humans to Neanderthals, who died out about 30,000 years ago, held that there was a `missing link' between Neanderthals and Homo Sapiens....

But the works and remains of such a creature, had it ever existed, would be all over the place and easy to find. Standard theory has the neanderthal dying out 30K years ago and HIS works and remains are easy to find, and Gunnar Heinsohn has the end of the neanderthal more like about 4500 years ago.

21 posted on 08/13/2009 7:28:53 AM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946

I wouldn’t argue that Man descended directly from Neanderthal......but to say that they are soooooooooo different to make the assumption that they could not have co-evolved from the same common ancestor is not based on much more than the belief that Man walked with dinosaurs is.


22 posted on 08/13/2009 8:27:04 AM PDT by ElectricStrawberry (27th Infantry Regiment....cut in half during the Clinton years...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: decimon; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 21twelve; 24Karet; 2ndDivisionVet; ...

· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic ·

 
Gods
Graves
Glyphs
Thanks decimon.
The Neandertal Enigma
by James Shreeve

in local libraries
Frayer's own reading of the record reveals a number of overlooked traits that clearly and specifically link the Neandertals to the Cro-Magnons. One such trait is the shape of the opening of the nerve canal in the lower jaw, a spot where dentists often give a pain-blocking injection. In many Neandertal, the upper portion of the opening is covered by a broad bony ridge, a curious feature also carried by a significant number of Cro-Magnons. But none of the alleged 'ancestors of us all' fossils from Africa have it, and it is extremely rare in modern people outside Europe." [pp 126-127]
To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
 

·Dogpile · Archaeologica · ArchaeoBlog · Archaeology · Biblical Archaeology Society ·
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google ·
· The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·


23 posted on 08/15/2009 5:32:31 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946
Neanderthal DNA is generally described as about halfway between ours and that of a chimpanzee.
No, it isn't. That's just some creationist stupidity that I'd not seen pop up on FR in a very long time.
24 posted on 08/15/2009 5:35:00 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: decimon
"The sense of bitter taste protects us from ingesting toxic substances," the report said.
That's a fact.
I can't count the times that's saved me from ingesting cyanide. That bitter almond small is a dead giveaway.

hmmm, maybe I should find new friends?
They always say it was an accident, but I'm starting to have my doubts.

25 posted on 08/15/2009 5:40:31 AM PDT by Condor51 (The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Condor51
hmmm, maybe I should find new friends?

I suggest neanderthals. They won't poison you and they're good bowlers.

26 posted on 08/15/2009 6:23:24 AM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv; metmom; GodGunsGuts
Neanderthal DNA is generally described as about halfway between ours and that of a chimpanzee.

No, it isn't. That's just some creationist stupidity that I'd not seen pop up on FR in a very long time.

I've never seen that on any sort of a creationist source since most creationists would like to believe in a 6K year old Earth; I see it on science sites e.g.:

Comparisons with the DNA of modern humans and of apes showed the Neanderthal was about halfway between a modern human and a chimpanzee.

Neandertals are almost exactly halfway between the chimpanzee and modern humans...

Halfway Human... First Delson recreated the shape of SM3's skull using coordinates from some 200 points on its surface. He did the same for 23 other specimens-11 H. erectus, 10 modern H. sapiens, and 2 archaic H. sapiens. With this information, his computer program arranged the specimens according to their similarity, placing SM3 just about squarely between the erectus and modern humans-while even the archaic H. sapiens fell in among the erectus specimens.

Com­par­ing Ne­an­der­thal to hu­man and chim­pan­zee ge­n­omes showed that in ma­ny places the Ne­an­der­thal code matched chimp DNA but not hu­ma­n, Ru­bin said.

Again most creationists I speak with appear to think or at least want to think that the neanderthal was simply another race of modern humans, wjhich is clearly not what the evidence indicates. The neanderthal involved a species difference from us and not merely a racial or sub-species difference.

27 posted on 08/15/2009 6:39:27 AM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946
Quibble, ExpressIndia isn't a science site.

The "study" referred to appears to involve a Homo Heidelbergensis sample; out of a presumed 16000+ original base pairs of mtDNA, fewer than 200 were able to be sequenced in the late 1990s. It doesn't show anything, and doesn't have anything to do with nuclear DNA and actual characteristics or line of descent.

YECs don't attribute great age to Neanderthal, but even here on FR, that false idea that Neandertal was a chimp or nearly a chimp has indeed been saddled on by creationists.

neanderthal chimp site:freerepublic.com
Google

28 posted on 08/15/2009 8:00:04 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946; SunkenCiv; GodGunsGuts; tpanther; Fichori; YHAOS; Ethan Clive Osgoode

What I find interesting is the amount of stuff that’s called *creationist stupidity* that was taught as science at one time.

Examples are vestigial organs, junk DNA, most mutations are harmful, .....

There’s even the issue of frauds like Piltdown Man that evos keep bragging that scientists proved were a fraud, which creationists never believed was authentic in the first place.

Scientists/evos shouldn’t be so quick to disparage creationists for promoting the belief (which they don’t do anyway) of things that were taught as science at one time.

If there is any blame it belongs on the scientists who taught it to a whole generation of kids in public schools as science in the first place. Then they wonder why stuff that scientists have changed their position on is still circulating? It isn’t creationists fault.

Clearly the scientific community is remiss for not getting the word out better.


29 posted on 08/15/2009 8:04:10 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: metmom

But then that would entail scientists admitting that they were wrong.....


30 posted on 08/15/2009 8:04:47 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: metmom

The creationist politicians (because that’s what the “discussion” is about, politics) make a bunch of false claims about Darwinism etc, with a small leavening of stuff like what you said.

The Darwinists et al make a bunch of false claims about their own beliefs (denying of course that their beliefs *are* beliefs), with a small leavening of the creationist stupidities, which are numerous.

Many people are creationists — they believe in God, and believe that the universe was created — but don’t regard themselves as such because they don’t fit in with this or that flavor of creationism.

For the record, I am myself a creationist because the universe is so obviously a creation.


31 posted on 08/15/2009 8:42:30 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv; metmom; GodGunsGuts

That’s pretty reasonable. There are a handful of things which prevent me from being a 6K-year-Earth style literal creationist, including Venus which is ballpark for a 6K year age estimate and does not resemble Earth or Mars at all, and the neanderthal which I would GUESS was some sort of a proto-human lord of some previous creation, prior to Adam and Eve. Like I say, without a time machine, all anybody could do with that sort of thing is guess.


32 posted on 08/15/2009 11:57:03 AM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv; wendy1946; metmom; tpanther; Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus; Gordon Greene

==That’s just some creationist stupidity that I’d not seen pop up on FR in a very long time.

Awfully provocative, SunkenCiv. It would appear by the tone of your reply that you believe that creation science is synonymous with stupidity. Can you please supply specific examples to back up your allegation so we can get to the bottom of just who is (and who is not) stupid. You can start with Neanderthals, if you please.


33 posted on 08/15/2009 12:28:58 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

It’s not provocative at all — Neanderthal isn’t halfway between human and chimp. Claiming otherwise is in fact something creationists cling to, the same way Virchow (probably the originator of the first campaign to dump on Neanderthal fossils) clung to a series of escalating false claims.

Here’s something perhaps you hadn’t read, even though it’s in the same thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2314370/posts?page=29#29


34 posted on 08/15/2009 1:32:35 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946

Well said. One 20th c translation of the Bible shows no definite article in the first sentence, i.e., “In a beginning” instead of the usual “in the beginning”.


35 posted on 08/15/2009 1:36:14 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

That can arise from being translated into and out of languages which don’t use articles. When you have six or more declension cases, you don’t need articles....


36 posted on 08/15/2009 2:00:14 PM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

It was calling creationists stupid that I found provocative. I’m still waiting for you to cite specific examples so we can get to the bottom of who is (and who is not) stupid. And since you called creationists stupid in relation to Neanderthals, let us begin right there. Please be specific, and be sure to cite your sources.


37 posted on 08/15/2009 2:03:19 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv; wendy1946
It’s not provocative at all — Neanderthal isn’t halfway between human and chimp. Claiming otherwise is in fact something creationists cling to, the same way Virchow (probably the originator of the first campaign to dump on Neanderthal fossils) clung to a series of escalating false claims.

Did you read the links in wendy's post 27?

Why are you seeming to lay at the feet of the creationists this concept that Neanderthals are halfway between chimps and humans when it started with the scientists?

It wouldn't make sense for creationists to *cling* to it because in general, creationists don't believe that man evolved from some ape like ancestor to begin with, so Neanderthal couldn't possibly be half way between chimp and man. It just might be more similar to man than chimp, but it can't be halfway between something (chimp) and nothing (since man didn't evolve).

38 posted on 08/15/2009 7:21:29 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: metmom; SunkenCiv

The neanderthal DNA findings do more (much more) damage to evolutionism than they do to any other religion including Christianity. The findings totally break the chain. There is nothing on this planet which modern man could have evolved from; you’d need some new hominid closer to us in both time and form than the neanderthal and that creature, had he ever existed, would be very easy to find.


39 posted on 08/15/2009 7:26:01 PM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946

” you’d need some new hominid closer to us in both time and form than the neanderthal and that creature, had he ever existed, would be very easy to find.

—Neandertals overlapped with homo sapiens the entire time they were here. And the fossils are easy to find - they are found throughout europe, africa, and asia.
Both Neandertals and Homo sapiens probably split from Homo heidelbergensis.

Neandertals were never really viewed as an ancestor of Homo sapiens, since Neandertals are no older than Homo sapiens. The question has been whether Neandertals and Homo sapiens interbred, and whether Neandertals should be viewed as fully Homo sapiens (which is what I’ve always seen Creationists argue - this is probably the first time I’ve seen otherwise), or whether they should be seen as a sub-species, or maybe even as an entirely separate species.


40 posted on 08/16/2009 3:29:55 PM PDT by goodusername
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson