Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA now saying that a Dalton Minimum repeat is possible
Watts Up With That? ^ | Jul 28, 2009 | David Archibald

Posted on 07/29/2009 11:20:53 AM PDT by decimon

NASA’s David Hathaway has adjusted his expectations of Solar Cycle 24 downwards. He is quoted in the New York Times here Specifically, he said:

” Still, something like the Dalton Minimum — two solar cycles in the early 1800s that peaked at about an average of 50 sunspots — lies in the realm of the possible.”

NASA has caught up with my prediction in early 2006 of a Dalton Minimum repeat, so for a brief, shining moment of three years, I have had a better track record in predicting solar activity than NASA.

Hathaway-NYT

(Excerpt) Read more at wattsupwiththat.com ...


TOPICS: Astronomy; Science; Weather
KEYWORDS: agw; astronomy; catastrophism; climatechange; globalwarming; science; solarcycle; sunspots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: decimon

Didn’t the Dalton Gang die in Coffeyville, KS: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dalton_Gang


21 posted on 07/29/2009 1:04:27 PM PDT by US Navy Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Funny how many of them were marshals.


22 posted on 07/29/2009 1:46:00 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; BBell; ...
 
Catastrophism
 
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic ·
 

23 posted on 07/29/2009 1:57:11 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

So we have at least the possibility now that the current and next solar cycles will experience very low sunspot activity levels. This fact alone should halt Cap and Trade legislation in its tracks, yet it continues onward.


24 posted on 07/29/2009 4:09:29 PM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon
Maybe we are in for something worse than a Dalton Minimum. Livingston and Penn paper: “Sunspots may vanish by 2015″. http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/02/livingston-and-penn-paper-sunspots-may-vanish-by-2015/
25 posted on 07/29/2009 4:56:24 PM PDT by Eemian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

Thanks.

Will check it out.


26 posted on 07/29/2009 7:40:45 PM PDT by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: decimon

A few months ago, I wrote several scathing posts about the Dr.Hathaway and his ridiculously holding on to maintaining that SC24 was going to have a raging maximum in the face of all the evidence and his constantly pushing his curves back later and later. Solar dynamics physicists have been suggesting for a decade that SC24 would likely be weak, so it isn’t like he should have been so cock sure. FINALLY he is admitting that he has been wrong in doing so. I have to give him a bit of credit for belatedly eating crow, I guess. I just wish that he hadn’t been so adamant about persuading others of the dubious merits of his position.


27 posted on 07/29/2009 10:39:31 PM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon
“Nearly August and not a hurricane in sight”

My youngest daughter was stationed in Okinawa a couple of years ago and she would call every couple of week saying they were huinkering down for yet another typhoon. Worried us sick.

And Now? Nuttin.

28 posted on 07/30/2009 4:19:24 AM PDT by wolfcreek (KMTEXASA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: decimon
That's something not much mentioned. Nearly August and not a hurricane in sight.

Andrew formed Aug. 16th and lasted until the 28th, 1986.

29 posted on 07/30/2009 4:29:05 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Kennedys: Can't fly, can't ski, can't drive, can't skipper a boat, but they know what's best.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek
My youngest daughter was stationed in Okinawa a couple of years ago and she would call every couple of week saying they were hunkering down for yet another typhoon. Worried us sick.

Wow!

My youngest daughter was over there from '92 to '95 and it seemed like she was enduring a typhoon every time we called.

Hmmmm? Are we Daddys-in-law?

BTW - her being in Okinawa was the main reason we signed up for Vonage. $5.00 for a call instead of $100.00.

30 posted on 07/30/2009 4:35:00 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Kennedys: Can't fly, can't ski, can't drive, can't skipper a boat, but they know what's best.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: N. Theknow

“her being in Okinawa was the main reason we signed up for Vonage. $5.00 for a call instead of $100.00.”

Tell me about it! Luckily she had access to Vontage while she lived on base. When she moved off base, that was a different story.


31 posted on 07/30/2009 4:40:22 AM PDT by wolfcreek (KMTEXASA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek
Tell me about it! Luckily she had access to Vontage while she lived on base. When she moved off base, that was a different story.

Same story here. When she and Gunny-hubby moved off Kinser I got the bright idea of getting a "virtual" Okinawa number.

$5.00/month and it was a local call for her.

32 posted on 07/30/2009 4:45:31 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Kennedys: Can't fly, can't ski, can't drive, can't skipper a boat, but they know what's best.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: N. Theknow

Sweet deal.

My daughter also married while in country but, was sent home for medical reasons leaving her then husband in Okinawa. She then proceaded to run up a number of credit cards, VISITING.

KIDS?


33 posted on 07/30/2009 4:51:44 AM PDT by wolfcreek (KMTEXASA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape
"This fact alone should halt Cap and Trade legislation in its tracks, yet it continues onward."

Legislation is never about facts, it's about politics - as in many blood sucking insects.

34 posted on 09/13/2009 6:23:09 PM PDT by the anti-liberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson