Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's certificate number is later than the Nordyke twins even though he born a day earlier.
Vanity | 7/28/09 | Vanity

Posted on 07/28/2009 2:01:51 PM PDT by Smokeyblue

DinkyJackson wrote on this thread

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2302882/posts?q=1&;page=101

Obama’s (finally published) birth certificate serial number is 151 1961 - 010641, he was born on 8-4-1961, and the certificate was filed by the Registrar on 8-8-1961 ( http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html )

Today, the Honolulu advertiser publishes a story, and at the bottom includes a set of long-form BC’s from a woman who had twins at Kapiolani on 8-5-1961 who went to school with Obama.

http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20090728/NEWS01/907280345/Hawaii+officials+confirm+Obama%E2%80%99s+original+birth+certificate+still+exists

These twins were born the day AFTER Obama AT KAPIOLANI. And their certificate numbers are LOWER than his (10637 and 10638). They were born 8-5-1961, the certificates were signed by mom 8-7-1961, signed by the MD 8-11-1961, and signed by the Registrar 8-11-1961.

THIS MEANS HE DEFINITELY WAS NOT BORN AT KAPIOLANI, because his BC number (born on Aug 4th and filed with Registrar Aug 8th) should have a lower number than the twins (Born Aug 5th at Kapiolani and filed with Registrar Aug 11th)


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: barackobama; bho44; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; colb; eligibility; impeachobama; kenya; naturalborn; obama; obamanoncitizenissue
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-239 next last
To: Jen

The plot thickens again.


61 posted on 07/28/2009 3:14:18 PM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: chevydude26; FARS; bortog; BIGLOOK; STARWISE; Beckwith

So where is the newpaper announcement for the twins in the newspaper? (If I had twins I’d sure want it for their scrap book.)


62 posted on 07/28/2009 3:17:44 PM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

Of course the claim will be that the numbers kept in reverse order or some such Horse Hockey... LOL


63 posted on 07/28/2009 3:18:31 PM PDT by Typical_Whitey (Imagine if Bush had said the police acted stupidly when a black cop arrests a mouthy KKK member.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

Its the father’s citizenship that matters here...Kenyan/British or what? The mother was too young to confer citizenship.


64 posted on 07/28/2009 3:19:20 PM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannolis. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1000 silverlings; Typical_Whitey; Smokeyblue

I just noticed another difference in the numbering format. Obama’s is 151-1961-010641 - notice the 0 starting the last group of numbers. The twins don’t have an initial zero in that group. Why?


65 posted on 07/28/2009 3:19:51 PM PDT by Jen ("Oppressors can tyrannize only when they achieve standing army, enslaved press & disarmed populace.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue


66 posted on 07/28/2009 3:23:05 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist -ww- I AM JIM THOMPSON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

Hey, the Hawaiian official reported he is a natural-born citizen, and that’s good enough for the MSM.

Just like the word of several experts and officials that Saddam’s WMDs were hidden in Syria was good enough for the MSM to declare that Bush was telling the truth about the WMDs.

(SARCASM)


67 posted on 07/28/2009 3:24:36 PM PDT by cvq3842 (Countless thousands of our ancestors died to give us the freedom we have today. Stay involved!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #68 Removed by Moderator

To: Jen

My guess is the Hawaii COLB system converts an ‘’old’’ 2-digit birth certificate year into a 4-digit year since no one was worrying about the Y2K computer issue back in 1961. So many of these questions can only be answered by seeing the original long form. What number is printed on it?


69 posted on 07/28/2009 3:25:34 PM PDT by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius, (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Jen
The twins just have "61" instead of "1961". Anyone know why there's a difference in the numbering format?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2000_problem

70 posted on 07/28/2009 3:26:25 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Castigar
I think that is referring only to the serial number. The long form hasn’t been published.

There was two COLB images that were posted online the first one was by DailyKos on June 12. The KOmmies scanned .jpg image had the COLB number blacked out.

Then in August, "Factcheck".org released other picture images with the COLB number listed.

71 posted on 07/28/2009 3:26:59 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Jen

Yeah, you’re right. Good catch. Obama’s is six digits and the twins are five digits. In addition to the 1961 vs. 61

10637
10638
010641


72 posted on 07/28/2009 3:27:11 PM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Jen

I suspect they went from 61 to 1961 around the year 2000 and modified new certificates issued with old numbers...would 2001 be 01 or is that 1901?

the extra 0 is probably because of increase in population...


73 posted on 07/28/2009 3:27:33 PM PDT by rolling_stone (no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

What are the odds that someone took a picture of the baby nursery from the hospital the day the twins were born?


74 posted on 07/28/2009 3:27:55 PM PDT by OL Hickory (I AM JIM THOMPSON!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

I don’t know what number is actually printed on Obama’s long form birth certificate. I don’t have “standing” to find out that information. ;)


75 posted on 07/28/2009 3:30:36 PM PDT by Jen ("Oppressors can tyrannize only when they achieve standing army, enslaved press & disarmed populace.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult

From the article: “One thing that remains unclear is whether Obama has a copy of the original 1961 Certificate of Live Birth, or if he would even be allowed to see it if he asked.”

Why would there be a question of whether or not he would be allowed to see his original certificate unless he was officially adopted? I don’t know if this still holds true, but when a child was adopted they were not able to see the original birth certificate. So if Obama doesn’t have a copy of the original and he was adopted, he wouldn’t be able to get a copy of the original, just the new amended copy. Does this sound right or am I way off in this thinking? If he could only get the amended version, that’s not what he would want to show everyone.

And when Gov. Lingle said his certificate was sealed, was she just stating a fact due to adoption or did she have the certificate sealed?


76 posted on 07/28/2009 3:31:14 PM PDT by Marmolade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue
Has anyone checked to see if the Nordyke twins were listed in the papers as Obama allegedly was?


77 posted on 07/28/2009 3:33:52 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory

Wonder if the Nordyke twins PARENTS remember a VERY BLACK MAN and a VERY WHITE WOMAN having a son in the nursery there?? Back then, woman stayed in the hospital for a few days after giving birth.


78 posted on 07/28/2009 3:33:59 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: dead

“In the big picture, this tidbit is meaningless.”

No, in the big picture, this MAY be a vital piece of information. We don’t know yet.

It IS another small tidbit that is out of kilter, another small anomaly (of the many anomalies) in the saga of Barak Obama’s Top Secret Birth Certificate.


79 posted on 07/28/2009 3:34:04 PM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue; null and void; Beckwith; stockpirate; PhilDragoo; Candor7; MeekOneGOP; Myrddin; ...
I still maintain that his cert. number belonged to a newborn who died soon after birth.

Keep in mind that the term, "live birth," means the birth of an infant, irrespective of the duration of gestation, that exhibits any sign of life, such as respiration, heartbeat, umbilical pulsation, or movement of voluntary muscles.

A live birth is not always a viable birth.

I still maintain that the forger of the original "scam" image redacted the certification number BECAUSE, AT THE TIME HE CREATED IT, HE DID NOT KNOW WHAT OBAMA'S NUMBER WAS.

80 posted on 07/28/2009 3:34:33 PM PDT by Polarik (Obama: When destroying America is not enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-239 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson