Posted on 01/13/2011 10:16:28 AM PST by DontTreadOnMe2009
CBS News allowed the following comment to be published on its website, following an article about Obama’s visit to Arizona yesterday:
... Who were the doctor(s) and nurse(s) at Kapi`Olani that delivered Barack? My ex-wife worked at the hospital and I understand the records at Kapi’Olani are impeccable. Where are the foot prints? What public records exist that can even demonstrate that Mrs. Obama was even at Kapi’Olani on the day of Barack’s birth? Talk at Kapi`Olani, would have been unabashed, the city of Honolulu at the time very racist towards black people.
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
I am answering your Boehner post on this thread because (1) the other thread is dead, and (2) I spoke to one of your main points on this thread, in my post 391.
To elaborate, no, decidedly no; I do not think the MSM could have smeared Boehner if he’d cited Abercrombie’s statement. Rather, if Boehner had referenced Neil’s remarks re: the BC issue—and if he had done so without showing fear [not sure that would have been possible for him] the MSM could not have laid a glove on him. That was exactly the beauty of the set up. When Obama’s close friend and fellow commie affirms that more info needs to be released, the MSM *cannot* blame Boehner for reinforcing that foregone conclusion. All it takes is a modicum of media savvy and a bare smidgen of courage.
It also requires a commitment to the integrity of the Constitution. Draw your own conclusions.
As for wanting a “fighter”; no, that’s not even close to the issue. It is not conservative pols who run around relentlessly shouting they’re going to ‘fight’ for us. It’s Dems, and they don’t mean they’re going to fight the terrorists, or fight to open more energy resources on our own soil. They mean they’re going to fight fellow Americans who call themselves conservatives.
When conservatives speak of ‘fighters’ - we prefer the term ‘warriors’ - we’re talking about the soldiers on the front lines in Afghanistan and similar situations. These are the heroes fighting impossible odds due to Rules of Engagement that ensure they cannot protect themselves. What has Boehner done about this, I wonder? [Would the MSM paint him as a kook if he moved quickly to stem the massacre of young American soldiers? Is that the problem?]
No, I don’t want a ‘fighter’. I just want a Speaker who is smart enough and conservative enough to take advantage of the unique gift Ambercrombie delivered on a gigantic silver platter. As mentioned above, it only requires two things: a teensy weensy bit of savvy, and a rare, selfless moment when a pint-sized dash of courage overcomes the omnipresent political calculation long enough to let a man be a man, and speak up for the people who handed him his majority. It’s not too much to ask.
Thanks for the link you sent. I checked it out, but was unable to make the relevant connection. I wasn’t being purposefully dense; it just didn’t seem to bear on the issue at hand. I leave open the possibility that I somehow overlooked the significance altogether.
Nice way to deflect your constantly lies, and by your own admission we certainly know you are a PAID enabler, aka FINO, trying to keep your dear Fuehrer in office at any cost, nothing new here. You are in the same traitorous class as former NS and Drew, miss!
Illegal alien, miss? No, I'm certainly a more American patriot than you, miss. And am in possession of a "LEGAL" form N550 after pledging an oath to the Constitution, which you probably never have, miss!!
English is actually my fourth language, miss!!!
Just wonder how many language do you speak, miss???
During his confirmation hearing, Roberts was touted as the most intelligent judge as a judge to USSC, that nobody had seen before, and he passed every questions with flying color better than anyone before him without hesitation!
Now nobody is going to tell me that he botched the oath, if it was NOT for the very seriousness that he knew/know the usurper was NOT legal eligible to march into the W.H., and when at the same time looking directly in the eyes of the devil himself and being himself (Roberts) an enabler to the biggest scam and crime being presented to the American people by this Constitutional crisis!!
This having the meeting at SCOTUS January 14, 2009 in mind, which we don't know what transpired there!!!
Hasn't it been reported that the second due-over oath (without a Bible) also had some problems???
I was there when NS was escorted out!!
Immediately thereafter Drew asked for and Jim escorted him nicely to the door with one or two words!!!
IIRC there was also a third zot???
The other thing that is very curious is the timing of when Roberts invited Obama for the meeting - an unprecedented event that had never been done for ANY POTUS before taking office, much less one with lawsuits coming before SCOTUS, and even much much less the invitation coming from the chief justice who knew there would be cases before SCOTUS at the time the meeting took place.
IOW, Roberts in an unprecedented move specifically invited Obama for what Roberts knew would be an unethical ex parte communication.
And he did it on the exact same day as the first eligibility case came before SCOTUS. The day on which Roberts knew what the court had decided but the public hadn’t yet been notified. Roberts made sure not only that he invited Obama, but that the public got the news of the invitation before they knew what SCOTUS had decided on the Donofrio case. If I didn’t know better (cough), I’d almost say that was a deliberate attempt to make the invitation look as fishy as possible to as many people as possible. On the first day that SCOTUS actually had to decide something about Obama’s eligibility.
This was after the whole big mess with SCOTUS clerk Danny Bickel, where lots of people like myself wrote to SCOTUS to tell them there was funny business going on. Roberts probably knew there were already red flags raised by others and it sure looks to me that he made sure to raise some of his own in answer to those already raised.
I hadn’t heard about any problems with the 2nd oath. I know that it was not videotaped, just audiotaped. I wonder why that was.
Does anybody know about the admissibility or standards for audiotaped evidence? Is it any different than the standards for videotaped evidence?
Had you heard something different?
Yes before they ALL - the three other branches was slapped with (Soros'?) the "unspeakable" NBC issue of silence threat!!
I have heard couple times when somebody past Mr. Snerdly or others, bringing up the NBC issue!!
Rush would hit the "panic" bottom, first scolding them and immediately change the subject. Very very obviously and the same on our local host, Todd Schnitt coming on after Rush at 3 PM!!!
Isn't it very obviously when ALL the blond FAUX gals and guys don't want to touch this issue with a ten foot pole and instead become very vicious IF it brought to the surface. Very very and extremely suspicious???
Nice way to deflect your constantly lies, and by your own admission we certainly know you are a PAID enabler, aka FINO, trying to keep your dear Fuehrer in office at any cost, nothing new here. You are in the same traitorous class as former NS and Drew, miss!
Illegal alien, miss? No, I’m certainly a more American patriot than you, miss. And am in possession of a “LEGAL” form N550 after pledging an oath to the Constitution, which you probably never have, miss!!
English is actually my fourth language, miss!!!
Just wonder how many language do you speak, miss???
Regarding Lakin, He intentionally disobeyed a lawful order from his CO, a Medal of Honor winner. He refused to deploy to a war zone in Afghanistan. When you are ordered to deploy, you better be on the ship, instead of pulling some birther stunt. And to top it off he has been on the internet using his stupid stunt for the past 9 months raising money for himself and his birther lawyer. I am sure there have been scores of gullible birthers who have sent this charlatan money. I am sure the owner of this site agrees with me regarding lakin's stunt.
I came close to doing your two pings for you. Yes, two; one to the Big Guy whose site you are subverting, and one to Mark Levin. Then I thought I would give you one last chance to man-up and do it yourself. Here’s the issue: do the right thing:
Okay, TNTNT, let’s see to what use you are putting FR.
You used it to lie about Mark Levin. When called on it, you continued to lie about him. Do you think this site was created to give you a platform by which to smear Mark Levin? You certainly treat it that way. [If you dispute this, then post the full quote you attributed to Mark Levin, and ping him to it. Give him a chance to confirm or deny if. If you can’t or won’t do this, it confirms the fact you have been smearing him with a lie—which has been evident for some time now.]
You used the false ‘quote’ (or at least one word of it) to mock many good conservatives. You also left in the mind of many of these the idea that Mark Levin had called them ‘crackpots’. [Many who read your initial, lying post, no doubt left the thread before you were called on it. So they now believe a conservative icon called them ‘crackpots’.] Good job, TNTNT; you have taken FR and used it as a platform to smear conservatives via one of the most honorable and respected names in Constitutional Law.
The only problem being, this may not be the use the owner of this site wants you to make of it. Best to check with the appropriate party, and make sure your activities are in keeping with the intended purpose of this site.
You used this site to mock LTC Lakin. Do you think this site was set up to give you a platform from which to mock an honorable man? What gives you that idea? Have you checked with management, and alerted all concerned that you are using FR to mock LTC Lakin? Perhaps you should do so, and find out if that is the purpose of FR.
I will await the results. From what I understand, FR is not intended as a place to demean and lie about conservatives, or to mock and ridicule them. Maybe I am mistaken. I will wait and see how management and Mark Levin respond to your inquiries, and draw my own conclusions.
[Your willingness to follow through goes to your credibilty and integrity. If you refuse to take these simple and reasonable steps, then your credibility is zero, and you have a lot to answer for.]
Four languages! That is very impressive.
As to zots, I only read about them. I have yet to see a troll get ozoned in real time. I would like to see it, though.
Perhaps one of our current batch of Obamabots would like to volunteer? It’s very easy—along the lines of AA:
‘Hello, my name is [Freeper handle], and I am an anti-conservative troll. I believe everything Obama tells me, and I hope he wins in 2012.’
The rest, as they say, will take care of itself.
What statute says that valid authorization from a Commander in Chief is “irrelevant” to the lawfulness of combat deployment orders? It’s not Title Ten and it’s not the Authorization for the Use of Force. What did Judge Lind cite as the statutory basis for her saying that?
What law or rule forbids a brigade commander from issuing combat deployment orders to Iran this very second?
Explains what, Schmuck?
I see no problems with what poster danamco has said.
ML/NJ
0bama vs Obama - now that is funny! I think I will opt for the former spelling in the future.
Thank you, the trolling multiple language expert, miss jamese, as you know is an admitting paid Soros(?) hireling who also is posting on some questionable leftist forums!
After her buddies NS/Drew were "kindly" escorted out of the premises by Jim, she allied herself with a new FINO!!
Trolling 'N Trolling 'N Trolling = TNTNT!!!
In any upper case, its the story of “O”, LOL.
I mean how silly can it get? I enjoy watching all of his leg tingled followers have Obasms, while being mind raped.
Fodder for ultimate ridicule.
The funny things are not really much of a joke. The right is castigated with having acurate effective debate, having truthfully scored deeply, and it is labelled vitriolic, while the left gets off with saying their vitriol is mere Obapassion. Again the story of “O.”
And last night we were treated to a show of Obamemorial in Tucson, when the tragic death rememberance became just another Obapit stop on the campaign trail. Another story of “O”.
Well I am getting ahead of this game. All of the Oba-effers can just go and Oba-eff themselves. Vitriol be damned and full speed ahead. Oba-unity is nothing but lockstep statism.
I will take good old red blooded American vitriolic debate over Oba-unity from this Liar and Fraud pretend Oba-president at ALL times, and bear no apology for it.Take it to the Oba-bank, if there are any left in a few years, that have not come here from Zimbabwe.
The Story of “O” indeed. LOL.
I just want a Speaker who is smart enough and conservative enough to take advantage of the unique gift Ambercrombie delivered on a gigantic silver platter.
It’s true. The Speaker threw away a great, free, rare, opportunity.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.