SCOTUS SOUTER TELLS OBAMA TO PRODUCE BIRTH CERTIFICATE DECEMBER 1 (Unconfirmed, see thread research)

Atlas Shrugs ^

[mnehring]

This is interesting. Souter tells Obama to produce the vault copy by December 1, 2008. I believe the messiah will defy the Justices.

Who will force the issue? Who wants to open up that pandora's box?  Imagine if there is something on that birth certificate that  disqualifies Obama from the office of the President.  What are you going to do? Start a civil war? There will be blood in the streets you try to enforce the rule of law. This should have happened before the election. Obambi knows it too.

Here is the fraud report first reported at Atlas.

The Supreme Court and Obama's Birth Certificate organicpeas

If The Supreme Court Decides…?

At this point, Supreme Court Justice David Souter's Clerk informed Philip J. Berg, the lawyer who brought the case against Obama, that his petition for an injunction to stay the November 4th election was denied, but the Clerk also required the defendants to respond to the Writ of Certiorari (which requires the concurrence of four Justices) by December 1. At that time, Mr. Obama must present to the Court an authentic birth certificate, after which Mr. Berg will respond.

If Obama fails to do that, it is sure to inspire the skepticism of the Justices, who are unaccustomed to being defied. They will have to decide what to do about a president-elect who refuses to prove his natural-born citizenship.

"I can see a unanimous Court (en banc) decertifying the election if Obama refuses to produce his birth certificate," says Raymond S. Kraft, an attorney and writer. "They cannot do otherwise without abandoning all credibility as guardians of the Constitution. Even the most liberal justices, however loathe they may to do this, still consider themselves guardians of the Constitution. The Court is very jealous of its power - even over presidents, even over presidents-elect."

Also remember that on December 13, the Electoral College meets to casts its votes. If it has been determined that Mr. Obama is an illegal alien and therefore ineligible to become President of the United States, the Electors will be duty-bound to honor the Constitution.

[grey_whiskers]

If Richardson knows that, then other Dems know that, and if they know it and have been hiding it.

IF that were true: Bush could imprison most of the national level Dems for treason.

Cheney would, Bush wouldn't. /sarc>

[Just mythoughts]

Since when does Rush get his evidence from us? I thought he had his own people doing research, and dare I say, he should be doing his own too. There is absolutely NO good reason for Obama to withhold his birth certificate. This issue didn’t help him, it hurt him...and as bad as he wanted to take control of the White House, he would NEVER have done something that would hurt him unless he had a very good reason. So what’s the reason? It’s a freekin’ birth certificate! The most common form of proven I.D. we have! Sorry to be yelling, but damnitalltohell....even Rush has let us down. And THAT is a fact.

Rush sent out that signal that he was aware of a questions over a birth certificate!!! Rush was also letting it be known that HE was not going to strike their match to set off their plotted and planned revolution.

Now why did Hillary NOT demand this birth certificate, why did she bow out and campaign for this man????

[shield]

Actually, this is not the issue. The issue is BHO was adopted by an Indonesian and upon that adoption his US citizenship was no more. When he returned to the US...he should have become a naturalized citizen....which makes him ineligible to run for President. [In Indonesia you can’t have a dual citizenship...from what I understand.]

[Lmo56]

Read Berg’s Petition For Writ of Certiorari - it spells out clearly all of the issues.

[Just mythoughts]

So obviously Rush knew exactly what he was saying today... It won’t matter who strikes the match so long as somebody can get somebody to do it.

[Lmo56]

Pretty much ...

[STARWISE]

Thank you .. I missed that thread.
Doesn’t surprise me the Code Pinkos
would instigate their typical
terroristic, Marxist crap.

Removing Pres. Bush from the White
House? Impossible.

The photos and videos I saw were
celebratory, of course; but even
had 0 lost, do you think these
heads full of mush would’ve actually
been willing to die .. to cross that
line?

And what will they do to 0, when
he doesn’t follow their mandate
to pull troops out of Iraq now ?

God save us ... more and more, much
as I reject my friend when she talks
about “this is all in the bible,” I’m
beginning to have the first stirrings
of “.... could it really be?”

[shield]

Is that why he went to such great links with Acorn...to lose this election. He had bus loads of Blacks from various churches going into various states committing voter fraud to elect him...yet he thought he’d lose?

[PeaceBeWithYou]

Mississippi is red too.

[Just mythoughts]

Is that why he went to such great links with Acorn...to lose this election. He had bus loads of Blacks from various churches going into various states committing voter fraud to elect him...yet he thought he’d lose?

Bama is their tool.... He wanted to win of course, using whatever means necessary. The puppet masters who he spends his free time with and fund him do not really care what happens to him. He probably has gotten the message though given who he appointed as his chief of staff. That was a signal for the world to let them know what kind of government he would be atop.

[MeekOneGOP]

Ping! Ping! Ping!

[Cindy]

OPINION:

I like your pings, but...

Please DO NOT ping me to any UNCONFIRMED topic threads.

Thanks a bunch MeekOneGOP for the pings, but unconfirmed
stuff just doesn’t interest me and I really don’t have the time for
it.

[LucyT]

[MeekOneGOP]

Okay. Sorry ‘bout that.

I ping to articles that either interest ME or that I
feel that OTHERS may be interested in.

Since I haven’t a clue what may or may not interest you,
I will remove you and not bother you just to make sure.

So if this does get confirmed, you won’t be notified. :)

Have a great weekend.

[LucyT]

Cindy, it would have been a kind thing to do, and certainly more diplomatic, if you had freepmailed him with your request.

[MeekOneGOP]

Thanks, LucyT. You’re great. :)

On occasion, I get a request like that.

Usually it is via Freepmail, and I always honor them.

Sometimes they are on a thread. And I honor those too.

I prefer Freepmail. Sometimes you miss the requests on
the threads and it gets overlooked.

[Cindy]

Thanks MeekOneGOP for understanding.
I really appreciate it.

[woofie]

I have lots of time for unconfirmed reports and speculative rumours .....(and dont forget the mindless crap)

[FBD]

conspiracy ping
;^)

[Amendment10]

The 34-page memorandum that accompanied the court order from Judge R. Barclay Surrick said ordinary citizens can't sue to ensure that a presidential candidate actually meets the constitutional requirements of the office.

Given that ordinary citizens have the 1st A. right to petition the federal and state governments for a redress of grievances, which certainly should include demanding that the president-elect satisfies constitutional citizenship requirements, respectfully, Judge Surrick is playing politics, in my opinion.