Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is this really it? (re: possible Obama's Kenyan B.C. - Attny Taitz) Click on the link
orlytaitzesq.com ^ | 8/2/2009 | rxsid

Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid

Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]

Attorney Taitz filed a NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Expedite authentication, MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for authenticity of Kenyan birth certificate filed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD.

Barry's Kenyan B.C.??

Special Motion for leave

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/ (site has been the target of hackers, proceed with caution — John)


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: armedcitizen; article2section1; awgeez; banglist; barackhusseinobama; barackobama; barackobamasr; bc; believeanything; betrayed; bfrcolbtwawlol; bho; bho44; birthcertificate; birther; birthers; birthplace; ccw; certifigate; changeamerica; citizenship; colb; commonlaw; conman; constitution; democratssuck; devilspawn; donofrio; dreams; dreamscopyright; dreamsfrommyfather; emerdevattel; emerichdevattel; englishcommonlaw; enoughofthiscrap; fakenews; fauxbama; founders; framers; fraud; georgewashington; gottrolls; greatpretender; hailtothekenyan; hawaii; headinthesand; hermaphrodite; hoax; honolulu; honoluluflimflam; hopespringseternal; hussein; imom; indonesia; johnjay; kenya; kenyabelieveit; kenyaman; kenyan; keyes; leodonofrio; lgfequalsdailykos; lgfhateschristians; lgfracist; lorettafuddy; lucyhazfootball; m0mbasa; marxistusurper; mas; mikeshusband; muslim; naturalborn; naturallaw; nbc; nothingburger; obama; obamabio; obamanoncitizenissue; obroma; ods; openyoureyes; orly; orlytaitz; orlytaitzpatriot; philberg; polarik; potusbogus; prezzot; qanoncrowd; repository1; rkba; rosemarysbaby; stalinistusurper; suckers; taitz; texasdarlin; thekenyan; thistimeforsure; tinfoilhat; trump; ukc; unpresident; usurper; vattel; vips; wakeup; washington; zulu666
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 10,101-10,12010,121-10,14010,141-10,160 ... 12,621-12,640 next last
To: Faith
Thanx Faith but that story I can find but I believe that same incident was reported with the reason for the detention as being him suspected as a British spy. I remember reading it and saying to myself what do the Russians know but have never been able to re-find it. A lot of scrubbing going on...
10,121 posted on 09/04/2009 7:27:18 PM PDT by GregNH (Re-Elect NOBODY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10120 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
It is still possible that the person responsible for imprinting baby footprints on BCs at the hospital in 1961 could still be alive. Only detective work and cooperation (protection) might be necessary to get the print! If we are lucky, that person might even be in the UK where lots of Kenyans seem to reside including some of Obama’s half siblings. Perhaps the baby-foot inker was a Brit missionary or other UK citizen, as Kenya was still a colony in 1961.
10,122 posted on 09/04/2009 8:25:49 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10117 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Posted by me on Lucas Smith’s YouTube site:

I am a retired CFE (Certified Fraud Examiner) as well as a retired CPA. Authenticity of documents requires examination of all features of the document. To be genuine, as many features as possible must be linked back to a hospital in Kenya in 1961 and not show evidence of fraud. The fingerprint might be that of an identifiable person who was in Kenya in 1961. That wouldn’t validate the whole document, just that feature, the fingerprint.

If the fingerprint is that of Lucas Smith (totally unlikely but must be considered) and appears to be in ink and put on the paper as the footprint was created, that would lead to another conclusion. No element of Obama’s background would be more significant than placing his birth in Kenya, if that is what validation of the document shows the experts on examination.

If Obama knows this document is genuine, I believe that he will inevitably conclude that he must resign before it is validated. This would preserve the constitutionality of his presidential acts prior to resignation. If he waits until it is validated in a court, all of his presidential acts to date would be subject to legal challenge because his non-natural born citizen status would have been proved and legal chaos would ensue.

Of all the features on the BC, the fingerprint could be the most forensically verifiable with the highest accuracy, as the current hospital stamp, current signature stamp and 48 year old signatures could have less certain validation compared a fingerprint. So this could come down to one finger of one nurse and whether she is still alive and can be found.


10,123 posted on 09/04/2009 11:02:17 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10122 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
thanks, for the information / thread / post.
Thanks, for the short / concise explanation.

10,124 posted on 09/04/2009 11:10:24 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Zer0 to the voter: "Welcome to 'MY' DeathCARE ® Plan"...Sucker! ...now just die. :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10123 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

In the late 50’s and early 60’s it was a very unfashionable to be an unwed mother. It was especially unfashionable to be unwed and pregnant with a bi-racial child.

As such, many young women were sent to “birthing homes” so as to not be an embarassment to their families. Most of the lying in periods were for a matter of months to allow the mother to consider her options. At that time, most of the options were adoption, although many women did not adopt their children and went home to deal with their circumstances.

The records from homes such as Florence Crittendon, Salvation Army, etc., were kept in strict confidence and remain so to this day because of the number of adoptions that occured.

It is very possible the Ms. Dunham spent several months in one of these very secluded “birthing homes” and that could account for her long unaccounted absence and untraceability.


10,125 posted on 09/05/2009 12:09:13 AM PDT by After Hours
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 381 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

But, you say nothing about the footprint. Doesn’t that make the document self-authenticating when the Judge tells Obama to submit to a footprint?


10,126 posted on 09/05/2009 2:42:52 AM PDT by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10123 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

I am having a hard time wrapping my brain around the difference between resigning and being outed as to legitimacy of actions.


10,127 posted on 09/05/2009 4:19:54 AM PDT by GregNH (Re-Elect NOBODY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10123 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

You are right in having a problem with an explanation that sets forth a distinction without a difference as it relates to the effect resigning or being forced out of office would have on past actions by a Constitutionally unqualified president. It makes no difference how he leaves office or when he does, all prior actions are ultra vires, that is without authority and all prior acts are null and void. That is a true Consitutional crisis which will cause grevious harm to this country. Anyone who would deliberately put the country through just epic tragedy should be tried for treason.


10,128 posted on 09/05/2009 6:25:29 AM PDT by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10127 | View Replies]

To: iontheball
Here is a succinct statement from the US Indian Health Service explaining that there is “no evidence” that baby footprints have “actual value” in identifying infants:

This transmittal Notice transmits a pen and ink change of Chapter 13 - Maternal and Child Health, Part 3 - Professional Services of the Indian Health Manual.

Please replace paragraph 8 of Section 2F3.a(b) with the following statement taken from the recently released Guidelines for Perinatal Care written jointly by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists:

“Individual hospitals may want to continue with the footprinting and fingerprinting but universal use of this practice is no longer recommended.”

This change is made because this method of identifying newborns is no longer universally recommended and there is no evidence that it has any actual value in identifying newborns.

http://www.ihs.gov/PublicInfo/Publications/IHSManual/TN_Project/80_89/tn83_7.htm

10,129 posted on 09/05/2009 7:29:23 AM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10126 | View Replies]

To: GregNH; iontheball
I don't think the president's actions since taking office could be legally contested as invalid until the moment he is declared not to be president specifically due to a constitutional proceeding (impeachment or quo warranto) that would achieve removal by proving ineligibility or intentional concealment of ineligibility.

There is a large time gap and many legal roadblocks between commencement of discovery to prove up the alleged Kenyan BC and actual constitutional removal of the president, if warranted.

My point is that if Obama resigns before any Kenyan BC even begins to be validated in federal court, removal for ineligibility would be averted and his prior legal acts preserved, or at least the bar to successfully contesting prior legal acts would be much higher. I am guessing. I am not a lawyer.

10,130 posted on 09/05/2009 8:00:25 AM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10127 | View Replies]

To: iontheball
Exactly right! How can Obama RESIGN from an office he NEVER held?
10,131 posted on 09/05/2009 9:22:09 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts ma'am, just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10128 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
My point is that if Obama resigns before any Kenyan BC even begins to be validated in federal court

Obama will be REQUIRED to submit HIS documents to make the validity of the Kenyan documents moot. This case is all about DISCOVERY. Once he produces or fails to produce documents and CAN'T prove his eligibility, it will be OVER for him. He will have to Quit or be forced out by public uprising. We won't have to wait for a court decision.

10,132 posted on 09/05/2009 9:28:09 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts ma'am, just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10130 | View Replies]

To: faucetman

Obama COULD be gone by the end of the week


10,133 posted on 09/05/2009 9:29:42 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts ma'am, just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10132 | View Replies]

To: faucetman
If Obama resigned, all the current cases against the sitting president would have to be reassessed to see if the plaintiffs have standing to bring a cause of action in a specific court with jurisdiction against now private citizen Obama, who was never proved ineligible ni a constitutional proceeding and who is legally protected for acts committed while president.

I would think all the military cases would be totally out the window (moot). Just validating a Kenyan BC in a US court will be daunting, given the corruption in Kenya. Kenya is deeply divided with less than half aligned with Obama’s cousin, Odinga, and the rest against him.

I doubt that the “chain of custody” of Lucas Smith's document can be proved sufficiently to satisfy a court. Getting testimony from anyone in Kenya will be problematic.

While Smith's document has a signature stamp of the hospital administrator on it along with the hospital stamp and the official seal, all of those could have been “misappropriated” just long enough to be applied to real or forged document. Testimony would have to be obtained from all involved parties at the hospital in Kenya and other folks have commented that US courts have no treaty relationship with Kenya sufficient to compel cooperation (I don't know if this is true).

As you point out, the court of public opinion is another matter, and I agree. Obama knows whether this document is true, based on his evasive behavior regarding his refusal to release his HI vital records which I can only attribute to an attempt to hide vulnerability to discovery of a secret of this magnitude.

If the Lucas Smith sworn affidavit calls into question Obama’s HI vital records and drives federal court discovery is ordered in Orly's case...and then those vital records in HI indicate report of a home birth with no hospital or doctor witnesses I don't think Obama or especially the big money and big influence folks who found, groomed, marketed and teleprompted Obama to achieve their agenda will allow their agenda to be derailed by the paralysis of constitutional proceedings to formally and finally determine Obama’s eligibility. I think great pressure would be brought to bear on Obama to resign by his backers!

10,134 posted on 09/05/2009 9:58:09 AM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10132 | View Replies]

To: After Hours

” n the late 50’s and early 60’s it was a very unfashionable to be an unwed mother. It was especially unfashionable to be unwed and pregnant with a bi-racial child.”

When people discuss Barry’s BC controversy, I think they apply modern practices and policies to the situation, forgetting that the time period was almost 50 years ago.

The Civil Rights laws did not get passed until 1964 and 1965 and this was a time of huge national angst and uproar about segregation.
Dating outside your religion was not widely accepted.
Dating outside your race was almost non existent.
Out of wedlock births were a huge social stigma.
An out of wedlock birth of a bi racial child to a teen age girl
would have been a social nightmare for the grandparents.
In Obama’s book, he wrote about how upset his grandparents
were about the relationship between their teen age daughter and this older, black man.
No one went to their wedding and no real record exists, he wrote.
No relatives were informed.
The parents were already very uncomfortable with the relationship , even before the pregnancy.
He infers that once “ the baby “ arrived, their views softened.
“ Then the baby arrived with 10 fingers and 10 toes “ is the extent to which he discusses his mother’s pregnancy and his birth.
And almost makes it sound as if the birth was a surprise.


10,135 posted on 09/05/2009 10:31:46 AM PDT by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10125 | View Replies]

To: After Hours
In the late 50’s and early 60’s it was a very unfashionable to be an unwed mother. It was especially unfashionable to be unwed and pregnant with a bi-racial child.

And you know this, how?

I was a young woman in the late 1950s and early 1960s, and I can assure you that none of the above was fashionable. NOT AT ALL!

If it were fashionable why would ypur next point be the case:

As such, many young women were sent to “birthing homes” so as to not be an embarassment to their families

I fear that you are condensing later practices and imagining them to be the case in earlier years. "Birthing homes" existed precisely because unwed pregnancy of any color was highly UNFASHIONABLE!

10,136 posted on 09/05/2009 10:33:47 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10125 | View Replies]

To: faucetman
He will have to Quit or be forced out by public uprising.

And which public would that be? Even most Republicans just roll their eyes when you say that you don't think that Obama is a citizen.

Besides, we have to get rid of a lot more people than just Obama in order to take this country back. Quitting will not make his various appointments null and void. They will continue on until replaced by a new President. Will it be Biden? You see, my thesis is proved.

To put this country back on an even keel, a lot of people will have to be replaced.

10,137 posted on 09/05/2009 10:42:21 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10132 | View Replies]

To: Wild Irish Rogue
Dating outside your race was almost non existent.

Loving v. Virginia wasn't ruled on by the U.S. Supreme Court until 1967.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loving_v._Virginia

Interesting how the purported marriage of BHO Sr. and SADO is seen through the lens of today's values and practices.

10,138 posted on 09/05/2009 10:45:23 AM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10135 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
TY we agree on much. The legal end of this will take years. All things will not need to be litigated though. A definitive SCOTUS decision would be used to support or defend other cases and should prevail, discouraging other suits. Like we said all that really doesn't matter because Obummer would be GONE. I think everything he had a hand in would be suspended pending adjudication. Congress & new president could undo most of it long before any court decision making those cases moot. We CAN survive this.
10,139 posted on 09/05/2009 10:53:22 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts ma'am, just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10134 | View Replies]

To: thecodont

Being eleven years old in 1961, I can tell you that a Negro man holding hands with a white woman would be noticed by EVERYONE, scorned by MOST, and invited violence by some.


10,140 posted on 09/05/2009 10:57:31 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts ma'am, just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 10,101-10,12010,121-10,14010,141-10,160 ... 12,621-12,640 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson