Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Seizethecarp

But, you say nothing about the footprint. Doesn’t that make the document self-authenticating when the Judge tells Obama to submit to a footprint?


10,126 posted on 09/05/2009 2:42:52 AM PDT by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10123 | View Replies ]


To: iontheball
Here is a succinct statement from the US Indian Health Service explaining that there is “no evidence” that baby footprints have “actual value” in identifying infants:

This transmittal Notice transmits a pen and ink change of Chapter 13 - Maternal and Child Health, Part 3 - Professional Services of the Indian Health Manual.

Please replace paragraph 8 of Section 2F3.a(b) with the following statement taken from the recently released Guidelines for Perinatal Care written jointly by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists:

“Individual hospitals may want to continue with the footprinting and fingerprinting but universal use of this practice is no longer recommended.”

This change is made because this method of identifying newborns is no longer universally recommended and there is no evidence that it has any actual value in identifying newborns.

http://www.ihs.gov/PublicInfo/Publications/IHSManual/TN_Project/80_89/tn83_7.htm

10,129 posted on 09/05/2009 7:29:23 AM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10126 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson