Home· Settings· Breaking · FrontPage · Extended · Editorial · Activism · News

Prayer  PrayerRequest  SCOTUS  ProLife  BangList  Aliens  HomosexualAgenda  GlobalWarming  Corruption  Taxes  Congress  Fraud  MediaBias  GovtAbuse  Tyranny  Obama  Biden  Elections  POLLS  Debates  TRUMP  TalkRadio  FreeperBookClub  HTMLSandbox  FReeperEd  FReepathon  CopyrightList  Copyright/DMCA Notice 

Monthly Donors · Dollar-a-Day Donors · 300 Club Donors

Click the Donate button to donate by credit card to FR:

or by or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Free Republic 4th Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $23,031
28%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 28%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: topman

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Anti-gay Republican state lawmaker comes out after Grindr account exposed

    04/29/2015 9:43:51 AM PDT · by redreno · 20 replies
    http://www.washingtontimes.com ^ | Wednesday, April 29, 2015 | By Jessica Chasmar
    North Dakota state Rep. Randy Boehning has come out as bisexual after a 21-year-old man claimed the Republican sent him a photo of his genitals via the gay dating site Grindr. Mr. Boehning, 52, says the man who came forward is retaliating against him for a recent vote against expanding gay rights, The Forum of Fargo-Moorhead reported. Dustin Smith, 21, contacted the newspaper earlier this month, saying he recognized Mr. Boehning from Grindr, chatting under the user name Top Man! According to exchanges reviewed by The Forum, Mr. Boehning sent Mr. Smith an unsolicited photo of his penis on March...
  • Death of the Fairness Doctrine

    08/27/2004 2:13:58 PM PDT · by Askel5 · 8 replies · 428+ views
    Facsnet ^ | July 2, 1999 | Matthew Spitzer
    Telecommunications Act of 1996 Death of the Fairness Doctrine By Matthew Spitzer FACSNET Scholar Posted to FACSNET July 2, 1999 / revised Feb. 3, 2000 The fairness doctrine required broadcasters to cover controversial issues of public importance, and, when doing so, to provide reasonable opportunities for contrasting views on the controversial issue. Although the public justification for this two-part doctrine stood on the need to increase the quantity and quality of public affairs programming, the political purpose was likely to alter the tone of broadcast public affairs speech to be more centrist, and to blunt the force of trenchant...