Free Republic 3rd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $41,557
51%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 51%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: senatedems

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Hypocrite #12: Tim Johnson (D-SD) Op-Ed: A Lobbying Scandal-Not A Tribal Scandal

    01/25/2006 12:39:20 PM PST · by flattorney · 13 replies · 593+ views
    Native American Times ^ | January 25, 2006 | Sen Tim Johnson (D-SD)
    <p>Propietary article removed. Material is from a paid subscription site.</p>
  • Who Is Harry Reid Kidding?

    01/25/2006 2:18:30 PM PST · by flattorney · 9 replies · 990+ views
    Who Is Harry Kidding? In Speech Blasting Republicans For A Culture Of Corruption Harry Reid Demonstrates His Hypocrisy Knows No Bounds Reid Pointed Fingers At President Bush For "Stonewalling" About His Connections To Jack Abramoff Reid Today: “Finally, we must hear the President commit to honest leadership. In his 2000 campaign, George Bush promised to bring ‘dignity’ to the White House, but we’ve since found that he brought Jack Abramoff instead. President Bush needs to quit stonewalling about his White House’s connection to corruption, and finally tell us how he’s going to reform Washington. Honest leadership is not a partisan...
  • Pat Leahy Labeled 'Abramoff Democrat'

    01/24/2006 9:40:05 PM PST · by Aussie Dasher · 49 replies · 2,075+ views
    NewsMax.com ^ | 25 January 2006 | Carl Limbacher
    While national Democrats are calling the Jack Abramoff lobbying imbroglio a "Republican scandal," top Vermont Democrat, Sen. Pat Leahy, is being labeled an "Abramoff Democrat" by home state critics. The Vermont Guardian has uncovered thousands of dollars in contributions to Leahy by lawfirms linked to Abramoff - though the senator's spokesman says that any suggestion of a relationship to the disgraced Republican is ridiculous. "It’s preposterous to even think that Jack Abramoff would do anything to support a progressive Democratic leader like Patrick Leahy," Ed Pagano, Leahy’s chief of staff, told the paper. However, the Guardian says it has discovered...
  • Partisan Vote Justified? Sour Grapes! Freep this poll!

    01/24/2006 10:18:50 AM PST · by gsrinok · 83 replies · 1,745+ views
    Was the partisan vote justified, or is this "sour grapes on the part of the Democrats?
  • Democrats Don't Need Hearings

    01/24/2006 7:56:57 AM PST · by ConservativeGadfly · 19 replies · 1,238+ views
    Townhall.com ^ | January 23, 2006 | Kay Daly
    Democrats don't need hearings Jan 23, 2006 by Kay Daly Judging from the microseconds between President Bush’s announcement of Samuel Alito to be the next Supreme Court Justice and the hysterical howls from the multitude of leftist organizations in the quickly formed anti-Alito chorus, it is clear that no matter how Judge Alito performed in the hearings, the Left would not be remotely interested in a fair confirmation process. It has been this way since the beginning of the Bush administration. President Bush’s hand was barely off the Bible in his first term when liberal legal activists, such as Abner...
  • Pro Lifers in DC for March for Life should visit Red State Dem Senators - Vote Yes on Sam Alito

    01/23/2006 5:50:36 AM PST · by TheEaglehasLanded · 2 replies · 549+ views
    vanity | January 23, 2006 | the eagle has landed
    Springfield, IL had a great rally for life yesterday, Deb Schultz who had an abortion in 1986 later to have 5 children, the father is now a minister and she works at a crisis pregnancy center. Attendance was 750-800 people
  • Did Democrats Seal Their Defeat in Alito Hearings?

    01/22/2006 11:19:25 AM PST · by rface · 33 replies · 2,111+ views
    Legal Times / Law.com ^ | 01-23-2006 | T.R. Goldman
    "We shot our wad. We filibustered 10 guys, and at the end of the day the worst got on anyway," says a former Judiciary Committee counsel. "If we had not used the filibuster and pissed off the Republicans over the past four years, if it was seriously being entertained for the first time [against Alito], we might have succeeded.".......There are any number of ways to fault the performance of Senate Democrats in their campaign to keep Samuel Alito Jr. -- seemingly as rock-ribbed a conservative as you'll find -- off the high court. During Alito's weeklong confirmation hearings, Senate Judiciary...
  • Filibuster Alito? (Democrats suffer broken backs; Alito hearings blamed)

    01/20/2006 11:11:53 PM PST · by JohnHuang2 · 51 replies · 2,516+ views
    Townhall.com ^ | Saturday, January 21, 2006 | Robert Novak
    WASHINGTON -- Pressure from liberal activists to oppose confirmation of Judge Samuel Alito for the Supreme Court has been so intense that Democratic senators may be trapped into a filibuster that they do not want to wage -snip- But Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid may not want to risk causing Senate Republican Leader Bill Frist to set a precedent by using the "nuclear" option: to end a filibuster by simple majority vote. Continues... ============================================================ Democrats suffer broken backs; Alito hearings blamed "The system's kind of broken," says Sen. Joe Biden. The "system" of "kind of" confirmation hearings. But Biden says...
  • Paper Decides to Close Blog, Citing Vitrio [WA Post bloggers can't handle Abramoff's tie to Dems]

    01/20/2006 6:05:05 AM PST · by summer · 22 replies · 1,182+ views
    NYT ^ | Jan. 20, 2006 | KATHARINE Q. SEELYE
    The Washington Post shut one of its blogs yesterday, saying it had drawn too many personal attacks, profanity and hate mail directed at the paper's ombudsman. The closing was the second by a major newspaper in recent months. An experiment in allowing the public to edit editorials in The Los Angeles Times lasted just two days in June before it was shut because pornographic material was being posted on the site. The Post's blog, open to the public since Nov. 21, was shut indefinitely yesterday afternoon with a notice from Jim Brady, executive editor of www.washingtonpost.com. Mr. Brady wrote that...
  • Alito Ads Target Dems: 'Stand With Mainstream, Not Ted Kennedy'

    01/20/2006 2:27:26 PM PST · by boryeulb · 15 replies · 773+ views
    HumanEventsOnline.com ^ | Jan 20, 2006 | Robert B. Bluey
    A conservative group supporting Samuel Alito’s confirmation will launch TV ads in North and South Dakota this weekend that ask moderate Senate Democrats to “stand with mainstream America, not Ted Kennedy.” The Coalition for a Fair Judiciary is spending $100,000 on the TV ads. Two Democratic senators, Kent Conrad (N.D.) and Tim Johnson (S.D.), are targeted in the 30-second commercials. Both remain undecided about Alito's confirmation. Conrad has the most to lose if he chooses to cast a "no" vote. He is up for re-election in November and hails from a conservative state that President Bush easily carried in 2000...
  • ‘Washington Post’ Suspends Comments on One of its Blog

    01/19/2006 4:43:16 PM PST · by Mobile Vulgus · 36 replies · 1,653+ views
    Editor and Publisher ^ | January 19, 2006 | By E&P Staff
    NEW YORK Jim Brady, the executive editor at washingtonpost.com, notified users of the post.blog that the public comment feature had been suspended “indefinitely” after “a significant number of folks” posted personal attacks, profanity, and hate speech. Attempts by E&P to reach Brady have been unsuccessful so far. It seems likely the move is related to controversy in recent days over Sunday’s Post column by ombudsman Deobrah Howell. She has been heavily criticized by some political Web sites and bloggers for writing that indicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff gave money to both political parties, when most research shows he only gave directly...
  • WHAT IS AN "ABRAMOFF DEMOCRAT"? (One Hypocritical Enough To Think Abramoff Isn't A Democrat Problem)

    01/18/2006 3:03:59 PM PST · by RWR8189 · 6 replies · 674+ views
    Dems Unveil Their Ethics Plan One Day After GOP:"The Honest Leadership And Open Government Act Would End Republican Culture Of Corruption By: Closing The Revolving Door Between Lawmakers And Lobbyists By Doubling The Amount Of Time Lawmakers And Staffers Must Wait Before Lobbying Congress; Prohibiting The Receipt Of Gifts, Including Meals, Entertainment And Travel, From Lobbyists;Clamping Down On 'Pay-To-Play' Systems Like The One Set Up By Lobbyists Like Jack Abramoff; AndEnding Efforts Like The 'K Street Project,' Which Republicans Created To Force Corporations And Lobbying Firms To Hire Republicans In Exchange For Political Access." (Democratic National Committee, "Dean Kicks Off...
  • HYPOCRISY: Top Ten Things The Dems Don't Want You To Know About Their Ties To Jack Abramoff

    01/17/2006 4:38:30 PM PST · by CyberAnt · 26 replies · 2,364+ views
    RNC Research ^ | 1-17-06 | RNC Research
    HYPOCRISY n.: AN ACT OR INSTANCE OF SUCH FALSENESS Top Ten Things The Dems Don’t Want You To Know About Their Ties To Jack Abramoff 10. Larry Noble, Executive Director Of The Center For Responsive Politics, A Non-Partisan Government Watchdog Group, Says Democrats Are Just As Caught Up In The Abramoff Scandal. Noble: “I Would Say, Broadly Defined As A Question Of The Tribes’ Buying Influence In Washington, It Includes Democrats.” (Donald Lambro, “Dean Denies Party Ties To Abramoff,” The Washington Times, 1/11/06) 9. 39 Of 44 Senate Democrats, And 1 Of 1 Senate Independents, Have Accepted Contributions From Abramoff...
  • Will Democrats Take the Senate? In a Word, No.

    01/17/2006 4:22:48 AM PST · by billorites · 56 replies · 1,996+ views
    RealClearPolitics ^ | January 17, 2006 | Richard Baehr
    Democratic National Chairman Howard Dean is talking of retaking control of the Senate in the 2006 elections. With Republicans holding 55 seats, and having to defend only 15 of the 33 seats that are up this year, that would be a tall order for the Democrats. With Vice President Cheney able to cast a tie-breaker in a 50-50 Senate, the Democrats would have to pick up a net of six seats to wrest control of the chamber.At the moment, there are six Republican-held seats in some degree of jeopardy. Those are the seats held by Conrad Burns in Montana, Lincoln...
  • Democrats Delay Vote on Alito Nomination

    01/17/2006 10:00:21 AM PST · by Cindy_Cin · 32 replies · 1,264+ views
    CNS News ^ | January 17, 2006 | Susan Jones
    (CNSNews.com) - As announced last week, the Senate Judiciary Committee was scheduled to meet today -- Tuesday -- to vote on the nomination of Judge Samuel Alito to the U.S. Supreme Court. But it's not going to happen as planned. Despite protests from Republicans, Democrats on the committee have pushed back the Judiciary Committee vote by one week, to Tuesday, Jan. 24, invoking their right to do so under Senate rules
  • Democrats Have No Shame

    01/16/2006 7:16:57 PM PST · by Aussie Dasher · 23 replies · 1,179+ views
    Human Events Online ^ | 17 January 2006
    Old blowhards don’t fade away, we learned again last week, they just serve as Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee. It was almost two decades ago that Sen. Joe Biden (D.-Del.) chaired the confirmation hearings that gave America a new verb: to Bork. When President Reagan nominated U.S. Appeals Court Judge Robert Bork to the Supreme Court, it was Biden who led his Democratic committee colleagues Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts and Patrick Leahy of Vermont in what was then the unprecedented trashing of a nominee of unquestioned professional qualifications and unblemished character. In 1991, in a committee still chaired by...
  • Chuck’s Chance (Schumer's Secret Plan For Senatorial Domination)

    01/16/2006 3:38:23 PM PST · by RWR8189 · 20 replies · 998+ views
    New York Magazine ^ | January 16, 2006 | John Heilemann
    Chuck Schumer reclines on the couch in his office on Capitol Hill, his stockinged feet propped up on the coffee table, a carton of takeout Chinese food perched precariously on his belly. It’s late one night a few days before the start of the confirmation hearings for Samuel Alito, and Schumer is laying out the objectives of each side in the high-stakes game. For the Democrats, Schumer says, the goal of the hearings “is almost metaphysical, or epistemological: It’s to bring out the true Samuel Alito. And his job is to say as little as possible, but enough so...
  • Schumer Angles for Senate Democratic Leadership

    01/16/2006 10:59:30 AM PST · by kddid · 58 replies · 1,207+ views
    NewsMax.com ^ | Jan. 16, 2006 | NewsMax.com
    Ted Kennedy told fellow Democrat Charles Schumer to "take the lead” in the grilling of Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito before the Senate Judiciary Committee. And the congressman from New York could parlay his prominent position on the committee into what Washington insiders say is his ultimate goal: The Senate Democratic leadership position. On the Thursday before the confirmation hearings began, Schumer gave a speech outlining the Democrats’ plan for questioning Alito. A few hours earlier, Kennedy had done the same. But Kennedy’s briefing "had not gone well,” a report in New York Magazine reveals. "Kennedy, looking tired and haggard,...
  • Chuck's Chance (Dem drug flash-back alert)

    01/16/2006 7:35:27 AM PST · by pabianice · 24 replies · 1,179+ views
    New York Magazine ^ | 1/15/06 | Heilemann
    Whatever happens with Judge Alito, Schumer is likely the Democratic winner. It’s all part of his secret plan for senatorial domination. Chuck Schumer reclines on the couch in his office on Capitol Hill, his stockinged feet propped up on the coffee table, a carton of takeout Chinese food perched precariously on his belly. It’s late one night a few days before the start of the confirmation hearings for Samuel Alito, and Schumer is laying out the objectives of each side in the high-stakes game. For the Democrats, Schumer says, the goal of the hearings “is almost metaphysical, or epistemological: It’s...
  • What planet are Democrats from?

    01/15/2006 4:02:46 PM PST · by KCRW · 46 replies · 1,989+ views
    Dallas Morning News ^ | 01/15/2006 | Mark Davis
    As if attacking Alito weren't enough, they also lied about Roe vs. Wade So, this is how far we have come. In 2006, a good man like Samuel Alito can be lectured on human behavior by the likes of Sen. Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts. Mr. Kennedy and his colleagues can gang up on a man who seems to have made almost no enemies and paint him as some pernicious closet misogynist bigot. Meanwhile, their fellow Democrat senator who was an admitted member of the Ku Klux Klan is toasted as a pillar of virtue. Robert Byrd can hang with...