Home· Settings· Breaking · FrontPage · Extended · Editorial · Activism · News

Prayer  PrayerRequest  SCOTUS  ProLife  BangList  Aliens  HomosexualAgenda  GlobalWarming  Corruption  Taxes  Congress  Fraud  MediaBias  GovtAbuse  Tyranny  Obama  Biden  Elections  POLLS  Debates  TRUMP  TalkRadio  FreeperBookClub  HTMLSandbox  FReeperEd  FReepathon  CopyrightList  Copyright/DMCA Notice 

Monthly Donors · Dollar-a-Day Donors · 300 Club Donors

Click the Donate button to donate by credit card to FR:

or by or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Free Republic 4th Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $15,300
18%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 18%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: hoaxhuckster

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Obama birth doc 'not scan of an original'

    08/02/2011 4:21:47 PM PDT · by RobinMasters · 266 replies
    WND ^ | August 03, 2011 | Jerome R. Corsi
    Detailed technical analysis of the PDF file the White House released April 27 indicates it is not a scan of the original document, as claimed by the White House, but instead is the final form of an electronic file used to forge the birth certificate on Adobe software, according to reports by experts. Failure to demonstrate how a simple computer scan can produce the effects observed in the Obama birth certificate PDF lends support to arguments that the Obama birth certificate is a forgery, the experts contend. OBOTs jump to defend Obama birth certificate The radical Obama supporters known as...
  • Another [again] graphics expert questions birth certificate

    07/12/2011 6:06:52 AM PDT · by RobinMasters · 36 replies · 1+ views
    WND ^ | July 11, 2011 | WND
    Another computer graphics expert is questioning the validity of the Obama birth document released by the White House. Victoria Nicks, who holds both a Bachelor's and a Master's Degree in Information Technology, argues that the presence of "differently sized pixels" in the image released to the public April 27 by the White House indicates that it's not "an exact duplicate of an original document scan." In a piece on the Decoded Science website, she also points out that there are "misaligned pixels" throughout the document. "The fact that there are different-sized pixels throughout the document indicates, without a doubt, that...
  • Birthers Sue Esquire Over Parody, Seeking More than $200 Million

    06/29/2011 2:36:33 PM PDT · by Berlin_Freeper · 27 replies
    blogs.forbes.com ^ | June 29, 2011 | Jeff Bercovici
    Farah, the CEO of WorldNetDaily.com, and Corsi, author of “Where’s the Birth Certificate? The Case That Barack Obama Is Not Eligible to Be President,” have filed suit against Hearst, Esquire magazine and writer Mark Warren over a satirical article that they say defamed them and damaged their business interests. They’re seeking compensatory damages of $100 million and punitive damages of $20 million, plus legal costs. [Update: As a commenter points out, that's only for one of the five counts; the full amount sought totals more than $285 million.]