Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2026 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $15,075
18%  
Woo hoo!! And now only $315 to reach 19%!! Thank you all for your continued support!! God bless.

Keyword: evolution

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • O'Donnell Didn't Dabble in Evolution?

    09/27/2010 7:25:20 PM PDT · by The Looking Spoon · 28 replies
    The Looking Spoon ^ | 9-27-10 | Jared H. McAndersen
    Here is Chris Coon's HBO campaign manager with another infomercial on Christine O'Donnell (See the video embedded at the original post here or on YouTube) Did Seth McFarlane say he would've "wrecked" her? Someone needs to remind him that "Family Guy" is just a cartoon. People watch it for the stupid jokes. Cartoons don't "wreck" people, sorry Seth. Even South Park doesn't actually "wreck" people, and Mr. Family Guy, you are no South Park. Want the ultimate proof cartoons don't wreck people? Barney Frank was elected to congress in spite of Elmer Fudd, Nancy Pelosi was elected in spite...
  • Maureen Dowd: Slouching Toward Washington (Wherein she attacks O'Donnell, Palin, Tea Party)

    09/25/2010 3:01:58 PM PDT · by 2ndDivisionVet · 42 replies
    The New York Times ^ | September 25, 2010 | Maureen Dowd
    Holy Roddy McDowall. Christine O’Donnell doesn’t understand why monkeys can’t turn into people right before her eyes. Bill Maher continued his video torment of O’Donnell by releasing another old clip of her on his HBO show on Friday night, this time showing one in which she argued that “Evolution is a myth.” Maher shot back, “Have you ever looked at a monkey?” To which O’Donnell rebutted, “Why aren’t monkeys still evolving into humans?” The comedian has a soft spot for the sweet-faced Republican Senate candidate from Delaware, but as he told me on Friday, it’s “powerful stupid to think primate...
  • Darwinism: Devilish Gnostic Myth Dressed Up As Science

    09/25/2010 9:47:50 AM PDT · by spirited irish · 86 replies · 1+ views
    Renew America ^ | Sept. 24, 2010 | Linda Kimball
    Today all people whose faith in God the Father is genuine face a seemingly insurmountable problem with what seems like an overwhelming weight of evidence that evolutionism is true and the Genesis account of creation is false. Mockers and scoffers abound, scornfully accusing the faithful of believing in “an invisible being in the sky and that a dead guy from 2000 years ago is coming back soon…instead of believing in reality,” as one scofflaw said recently. However, the real issue here is not “superstitious, backward Christianity” vs. “enlightened reason and science” but about one creation account (Genesis) vs. another creation...
  • TV Host Maher Shows Another O'Donnell Clip

    09/25/2010 6:37:13 AM PDT · by srmorton · 183 replies · 1+ views
    Yahoo ^ | September 25, 2010 | Randall Chase
    DOVER, Del. – TV comedian Bill Maher is taking another jab at Republican Delaware Senate candidate Christine O'Donnell, who as a conservative Christian activist was a frequent guest on his "Politically Incorrect" show in the 1990s. After O'Donnell won last week's GOP primary in Delaware with the help of tea party activists, Maher played a 1999 tape in which she said she had dabbled in witchcraft while in high school. Maher threatened to show more old clips of O'Donnell unless she appeared on his current cable show, "Real Time with Bill Maher." On Friday night, Maher made good on his...
  • Conservapedia spanks Richard Dawkins

    09/22/2010 5:52:04 AM PDT · by MarianoApologeticus · 9 replies · 1+ views
    Conservapedia ^ | 2010 AD | Conservative
    [Conservapedia reports] Message to—atheist and evolutionist—Richard Dawkins: The Conservapedia web page Resources for leaving atheism and becoming a Christian has received over 6,500 views in approximately 30 days and is featured in Conservapedia's Richard Dawkins article. Dr. Dawkins, thank you for giving Conservapedia so much material that supports the notion that the leading spokesmen of evolutionary "science" and atheism are incompetents and charlatans!
  • Why Mormons Should Embrace Evolution: BYU Biology Professor Steven Peck

    09/21/2010 6:44:28 PM PDT · by Colofornian · 108 replies
    BeliefNet.com ^ | Sept. 20, 2010 | Columnist Jana Riess with guest Steven Peck
    Recently a young mother complained to me that a non-Mormon family member had given her children the They Might Be Giants album Here Comes Science, which contains a song about evolution called "My Brother the Ape" (check out the great cartoon music video). She was uncomfortable with the lyrics because she felt they were incompatible with Mormonism, the Bible, America, and apple pie. Probably baseball too. I didn't challenge her views about Mormons and evolution, because the conversation didn't occur in the right context and I have been trying to listen more and shout out my own opinion less. (I...
  • Much Ado About “Nothing”: Stephen Hawking and the Self-Creating Universe

    09/12/2010 7:43:20 AM PDT · by SeekAndFind · 33 replies
    First Things ^ | 09/12/2010 | Stephen Barr
    Has physics done away with God? A newly release book by Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow says, “Yes.” What is a Jewish or Christian believer to make of this? Is the Creator now out of a job? The short answer is (unsurprisingly) no: the ideas propounded in Hawking’s book constitute no threat whatever to the Jewish and Christian doctrine of Creation. The idea that Hawking is now touting is not new—in fact, within the fast-moving world of modern physics it is fairly old. My first introduction to it was reading a very elegant theoretical paper entitled “Creation of Universes from...
  • As a scientist I'm certain Stephen Hawking is wrong. You can't explain the universe without God

    09/07/2010 7:22:42 PM PDT · by SeekAndFind · 31 replies
    Daily Mail ^ | 09/07/2010 | Prof. John Lennox
    There's no denying that Stephen Hawking is intellectually bold as well as physically heroic. And in his latest book, the renowned physicist mounts an audacious challenge to the traditional religious belief in the divine creation of the universe. According to Hawking, the laws of physics, not the will of God, provide the real explanation as to how life on Earth came into being. The Big Bang, he argues, was the inevitable consequence of these laws 'because there is a law such as gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing.' Unfortunately, while Hawking's argument is being hailed as...
  • Stephen Hawking's latest book fails to disprove God

    09/06/2010 2:41:02 PM PDT · by SeekAndFind · 18 replies · 1+ views
    Science and Values ^ | 09/06/2010 | Andrew Halloway
    Back on 11 August I wrote about Stephen Hawking’s forthcoming book and how it was going to challenge God as an explanation for the universe. The national secular media have now caught up. On Saturday (2 September 2010), the Daily Mail and the Daily Telegraph both carried exactly the same headline: ‘Stephen Hawking: God was not needed to create the Universe’, and the rest were similar, e.g. ‘Stephen Hawking says universe not created by God’ (the Guardian). The reason for all the publicity? The launch of the physicist’s book was only a week away. In the somewhat ironically titled ‘The...
  • Is Believing In God Evolutionarily Advantageous?

    09/01/2010 7:58:28 AM PDT · by SeekAndFind · 36 replies
    NPR ^ | 08/31/2010 | Alix Spiegel
    Jesse Bering's mother died of cancer on a Sunday, in her own bed, at 9 o'clock at night. Bering and his siblings closed her door and went downstairs, hoping they might somehow get some sleep. It was a long, hard night, but around 7 a.m., something happened: The wind chimes outside his mother's window started to chime. Bering remembers waking to the tinkle of these bells, a small but distinct sound in an otherwise silent house. And he remembers thinking that those bells carried a very specific message. "It seemed to me ... that she was somehow telling us that...
  • What’s the Matter with Texas?

    08/31/2010 11:45:55 PM PDT · by Rashputin · 13 replies
    Pajamas Media ^ | Aug 31, 2010 | Zombie
    In 2004, liberal historian Thomas Frank published What’s the Matter with Kansas?, a bestselling book in which the author expresses his utter mystification at how the citizens of Kansas could hold conservative values and vote Republican, when socialist economics and the Democratic Party were so self-evidently superior. While the author looked down his nose at the inscrutable ignorant rubes of Kansas, insultingly treating them like laboratory rats unable to solve the simplest maze, the book and its popularity ended up being more of a commentary on the ideological blindness of the author and his left-leaning readers: try as they might,...
  • Darwin, Evolution and God [World's Best High School Teacher?]

    08/31/2010 8:31:48 PM PDT · by Diago · 84 replies
    JamesHogan.org ^ | Sunday, 09 December 2007 20:34 | James Hogan
    Darwin, Evolution and God Writings - Christian Manhood Sunday, 09 December 2007 20:34 The Lord God formed man out of the clay of the ground and blew into his nostrils the breath of life, and so man became a living being. Genesis 2:7 We live in a world where movie stars offer political commentary and musicians are self-appointed experts on the rainforest. What is next? Plumbers who offer tips on French cuisine? The lines of expertise are often blurred. Admittedly, I contribute to the confusion. It is impossible to teach young people without, inevitably, someone asking me, “What do think...
  • Radio Replies Second Volume - Creation and Evolution

    08/29/2010 1:26:20 AM PDT · by GonzoII · 5 replies
    Celledoor.com ^ | 1940 | Fathers Rumble & Carty
    Creation and Evolution 534. Turning to visible things around us, I cannot see what is wrong with eternal evolution. If you intend, by eternal evolution, to dispense with God, you would find it a bigger problem to see what is right in it. In dealing with the origin of the universe you will find yourself in deep waters whichever way you turn. We know, however, by revelation that all things less than God were created from nothing by God, and that therefore they are not eternal. 535. Creation in time is a great mystery to me, and I cannot see...
  • Evolution/Natural Selection Derive From Cosmic Expansion

    08/25/2010 5:26:59 AM PDT · by Dov Henis · 20 replies
    E'postings | several, since 1997 | Dov Henis
    Natural Selection Derives From Cosmic Expansion Two suggested editorial items: I. Origin And Nature Of Natural Selection Update Concepts And Comprehension Life is another mass format. All mass formats are subject to natural selection. Natural selection is delaying conversion of mass to energy fueling cosmic expansion. Cosmic expansion is reconversion of all mass to energy. Natural Selection Updated 2010 Beyond Historical Concepts Natural Selection applies to ALL mass formats. Life is just one of them. Natural Selection Defined: Natural selection is E (energy) temporarily constrained in an m (mass) format. Period. Natural selection is a ubiquitous property of each and...
  • Glenn Beck blames the Holocaust on Charles Darwin ( And the left goes nuts )

    08/22/2010 7:10:42 PM PDT · by Halfmanhalfamazing · 154 replies · 1+ views
    Glenn Beck via Newsvine ^ | August 20th | proglib
    Last night, Glenn Beck blended his anti-progressive polemics with anti-evolution dogma, attacking Charles Darwin as "the father of modern day racism" who "plant[ed] the seed that leads to progressivism, eugenics." He expanded on this critique on the radio this morning, saying that Darwin wrote about "the savages" and announcing: "I understand why Darwin has to be taught in schools now. You have to teach evolution, because if you don't teach evolution, progressivism falls apart." According to Beck and his cohorts, a direct line can be drawn between Darwin, eugenics, and Hitler: "Charles Darwin is the father of the Holocaust."
  • Politicizing Science Education: A plague on both your houses

    08/19/2010 1:19:28 PM PDT · by TheConservativeCitizen · 137 replies
    The Constitution Club ^ | 08-18-10 | Verite
    Documentary educational television would have us believe that the single greatest scientific achievement of the past millennium was Darwin’s theory of evolution. Many religious fundamentalists have serious issues with this assertion. Many legitimate scientists with both secular and religious perspectives do as well. Darwin himself recognized serious shortcomings with evolution. A new sort of “scientist,” the evolutionary biologist, has come on the scene. These folks are specifically dedicated to supporting and proving a theory. Previously science did not work that way. Scientists used to look for evidence of disproof, only accepting theories that prove unassailable. On the other side we...
  • What are some popular baby names? How about “Atheist Evolution”?!?!

    08/06/2010 7:24:39 AM PDT · by MarianoApologeticus · 13 replies
    True Freethinker ^ | August 5, 2010 AD | Mariano
    This little ditty goes back to 1994 AD. yet, it was brought to mind recently as I thought about how atheists, essentially, define “atheism” as “anti-Christianity,” or “anti-theism” or “anti-…” pick your poison... Moreover, “George Rollason said his daughter's name is the couple's answer to other parents' use of biblical names.” Imagine that; explaining that you chose your child’s name on the bases of shoving it in other people’s faces. Yet, this all seems in keeping with the Rollasons who “have clashed with the school district over angel decorations in the classroom and Bibles in the library.” See what I...
  • New Chromosome Research Undermines Human-Chimp Similarity Claims

    08/05/2010 1:51:06 PM PDT · by lasereye · 76 replies
    Institution for Creation Research ^ | Apr 1, 2010 | Jeffrey Tomkins, Ph.D., & Brian Thomas, M.S.
    A recent high-profile article in the journal Nature released the results of a study with implications that shocked the scientific community because they contradict long-held claims of human-chimp DNA similarity.1 A previous Acts & Facts article showed that much of the research surrounding the often touted claims of 98 percent (or higher) DNA similarity between chimps and humans has been based on flawed and biased research.2 The problem is that the similarity has been uncertain because no one has performed an unbiased and comprehensive DNA similarity study until now. And the results are not good news for the story of...
  • A Classic Evolution Policy Blunder

    08/04/2010 9:42:04 PM PDT · by neverdem · 27 replies · 1+ views
    American Spectator ^ | 8.4.10 | Bruce Chapman
    Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal signed into law last year an act that sets parameters for teachers who introduce scientific supplements on Darwinian evolution, global warming, human cloning and other controversial subjects. The state's Science Education Act encourages "open and objective discussion of scientific theories being studied." It specifically prohibits religious instruction or interpretations (or irreligious interpretations, for that matter). The law is simple, reasonable and avoids constitutional and scientific mistakes that afflicted earlier laws in Louisiana and elsewhere. But in Livingston Parish, east of Baton Rouge, some enthusiasts for a literal Biblical account of creation decided that the new law...
  • Origins, Evolution, and Distribution of Life in the Cosmos: Panspermia, Genetics, Microbes, ...

    08/01/2010 2:46:04 PM PDT · by LibWhacker · 24 replies · 9+ views
    Journal of Cosmology ^ | May 2010 | Rhawn Joseph and Rudolf Schild
    Life originated in a nebular cloud, over 10 billion years ago, but may have had multiple origins in multiple locations, including in galaxies older than the Milky Way. Multiple origins could account for the different domains of life: archae, bacteria, eukaryotes. The first steps toward life may have been achieved when self-replicating nano-particles initially comprised of a mixture of carbon, calcium, oxygen, hydrogen, phosphorus, sugars, and other elements and gasses were combined and radiated, forming a nucleus around which a lipid-like permeable membrane was established, and within which DNA-bases were laddered together with phosphates and sugars; a process which may...