Free Republic

Elon Musk

Can anyone verify that this pic, which says it is a Presidential Tweet from June 2020, is something he really posted? ________________________________________

Follow the link-through.

https://twitter.com/RealRichardPoe/status/1324110917337030657

Anyone who really believes this cop killed a guy live on camera as part of some psyop is probably part of some psyop themselves...

________________________________________

Sorry, could you be a little more specific?

Are you saying that you don't believe a POLICE OFFICER could be programmed into carrying out a false flag psy-op?

Or are you saying that you don't believe ANYONE can be programmed?

Q has been pretty clear in telling us that programmed assassins are real.

See, for instance:

Q post 1629
Law enforcement should interview the therapists.
Each shooter has one coincidentally.

Just not sure how you can get police to agree to commit an act that will ruin their careers and destroy their lives...
______________________________________

Maybe the same way you get school shooters to do it? Mind control? Which would mean there's a psychiatrist in the picture somewhere.

Robert F. Kennedy’s granddaughter Maeve Kennedy Townsend McKean and her young son, Gideon, are missing, according to her husband, after a canoeing accident in Chesapeake Bay on Thursday afternoon.

________________________________________

Same thing happened to former CIA chief William Colby in 1996, near the confluence of the Wicomico and Potomac Rivers.

Waters must be treacherous in that area.

Disestablishmentarian wrote:

Well, I disagree with the Anon on almost all of these points ... but ... there ARE some benefits...

________________________________________

I see what you did there, Dis.

You took the Anon's post — which was encouraging us to TRUST THE PLAN regarding the coronavirus — and you flipped it around backwards, telling us that we SHOULDN'T Trust the Plan.

Specifically, you countered the Anon by implying that, if the virus panic helped POTUS in any way, it was only due to random chance, NOT planning.

This is consistent with many of your other posts.

For instance, you previously stated that anyone who Trusts the Plan regarding the coronavirus is "cult-like" and should be shunned as a "wacko."

You further suggested that such "wackos" (I'm correcting your spelling of "wacko") should be marked or blacklisted somehow on this board, to ensure that no one will listen to them, and you proposed that the term "W-J WARNING" (i.e. Wack-Job Warning) should be used to distinguish "cult-like" posts from those written by non-cult-like posters such as yourself, whom you described as, "those of us who value Q normally."

In other words, you proposed dividing the Q movement into two opposing factions, "normal" vs. "cult-like."

When I politely and reasonably suggested to you that "trusting the plan" is not necessarily "cult-like," you became uncharacteristically tongue-tied and declined to respond.

Which brings us right back where we started.

Now... about your screenname.

According to CollinsDictionary.com, a disestablishmentarian is: "A person who favors the separation of church and state, esp. the withdrawal of special rights, status, and support granted an established church by a state; an advocate of disestablishing a state church."

So is that your big issue, Dis? You think churches have too many "special rights" here in America? That their "special rights" need to be reduced or withdrawn?

The only "conservatives" I know who think that's a big issue are Ayn Rand libertarians, i.e. Objectivists.

But you told me you weren't an Objectivist.

Hmmmm.

I believe the correlation has been that people who are + have already been treated for malaria has simultaneously vaccinated them against coronavirus.

___________________________________

Oh. Sorry. Yes, I see now. That's what I get for reading the threads backwards, last to first.

Still, I wonder why Mexico, Russia, Libya and Greenland are clean, even though they're not in the malaria zone.

blue is malaria countries. Yellow is COVID-19

_____________________________________________

Are you implying that the black hats released COVID-19 to "cover" all those countries that weren't already "covered" by malaria?

According to these maps, the only countries not "covered" are Mexico, Russia, Libya and Greenland.

Those dang Greenlanders! Are they in on this? /kidding

from 3d3n:
I believe a website has been created & hardened by DoD at 11.11.11.18 IP

Doesn't 3d3n fall in the category of "outside comms?"

As in, "No outside comms"? (Q1318) and "NO comms made outside of this platform." (Q513)?

Just wondering.

I googled “George Soros” and “Hillary Clinton.” Looks like the same ole, same ole. Heavily filtered. Maybe it’s only certain topics that are unfiltered?

Disestablishmentarian wrote on a previous thread:

How to tell if you have developed a cult psychology regarding Q:

1) If you think Q can see the future, is a time traveler or any similar hocus pocus;

2) If you think Q is aware in advance of all the upcoming moves of the enemies of the USA and POTUS ... even before they may have made those decisions themselves;

3) If you think "Patriots in control" implies that Q actually controls events, rather than simply being in the seat of power (i.e., White House; some but not all other key positions);

4) If you think "Trust the plan" implies that everything which happens (e.g., coronavirus) is part of Q's detailed operational plan ... ...These are all cultlike beliefs.

...

PS: If you want to blast me for saying all this ... then YOU are involved in cultlike psychology. Think about it.

_____________________________________________

Number four is a real head scratcher.

Judging from your latest posts, you apparently accept that the virus may be an enemy bio-attack.

So why on earth would you push the idea that anyone who says "Trust the Plan" regarding said enemy bio-attack should be dismissed as a "cult-like" wacko?

Please explain.

Enemy plans — including biowarfare plans — can be learned through normal intelligence methods (HUMINT, SIGINT, OSINT, etc.). No time travel or ESP required.

In fact, Sun Tzu states that the ability to gain "foreknowledge" of the enemy's plans, through spycraft, is the defining difference between a victorious commander and a loser. He writes:

______________________________

Now the reason the enlightened prince and the wise general conquer the enemy wherever they move and their achievements surpass those of ordinary men is foreknowledge. ... What is called foreknowledge cannot be elicited from spirits, nor from gods, nor by analogy with past events, nor from calculations. It must be obtained from men who know the enemy situation.
[Sun Tzu, Art of War XIII:3-4]

______________________________

According to Sun Tzu, when a commander has "foreknowledge" of the enemy's plans, and has prepared accordingly, victory is certain.

That is why we Trust the Plan. Q has told us that POTUS has "foreknowledge" of the enemy's plans, and we find Q to be credible.

Most of the things in your list — such as controlling the battlefield, rather than letting the enemy control it; or anticipating the enemy's moves even when the enemy himself isn't sure what he's going to do — these are not "hocus pocus." They are essential skills which every victorious commander has mastered.

POTUS has led us from victory to victory. He has earned our trust. That's why we will follow him through "fire and water" or into the "deepest valley" (as Sun Tzu puts it).

That is why we Trust the Plan.

Someday, I hope YOU TOO will Trust the Plan. We could use a good man like you on our team.

Think about it.

Disestablishmentarian wrote:

...a cult-like following has developed comprising some of the followers of Q. ... If you want to blast me for saying all this ... then YOU are involved in cultlike psychology. Think about it.

bagster replied:
It is not productive to agree with and reinforce the derp media's narrative concerning the Great Awakening. Save that for the sleepy eyed old, done men beyond the trees.

_____________________________________________

Thank you, Bagster!

I was trying to tell him that before.

But you said it so much better! :-)

stole this:

Ha ha!

Post #3596
What advantages might exist when you know the other sides playbook?
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/trap

________________________________________

Ha ha! I forgot about that drop. Good find! But yes, that's exactly what I meant.

When Q says the hunter becomes the hunted, he means that our guys have advance knowledge of some enemy action, which they are allowing to play out, while using their foreknowledge of the enemy's plans to set traps for the enemy.

COVID-19 may be something like that. Maybe.

Does Trump have a plan? OF COURSE. But again, we are talking about humans making judgements in the face of uncertainty.

________________________________________

If I misjudged or misunderstood you in any way, I apologize. I didn't mean to come across so snarky.

It just seemed that you were trying really hard to plant the idea that the cabal has somehow outsmarted POTUS with this virus attack, and that defeat may be inevitable.

In some jurisdictions, at certain times in history, this type of talk was called "defeatism," and was punishable by summary execution on the battlefield. Not just snarky words.

Again, I do apologize if I misjudged or misunderstood you in any way.

My view is that it is not a tool of patriots and therefore ^nothing good^ can come of it. It only harms the American citizens and, people world-wide seeking human liberty and decency.

__________________________________________________

Q talks a lot about the hunters becoming the hunted (see, for example, Q3625 and 3599).

If our guys knew in advance that the enemy planned to deploy COVID-19 (and I'm sure they did), one way to take advantage of this foreknowledge would be to ALLOW the enemy to deploy it, but to set traps which would cause the attack to somehow backfire in the enemy's face.

In that case, there WOULD be collateral damage (unfortunately), but our guys would do their best to minimize casualties. One way to minimize "collateral damage" would be to "hack" into the virus (prior to deployment) in such a way as to reduce its virulence.

Just a thought.

ransomnote writes:

I often see “capture/kill” and in the forum, “we should have just grabbed them by now” etc. I believe POTUS and Q do not want to start the process that has unraveled the stability of other countries. Once peaceful transfer of power gives way to a series of coups, the bottom falls out... once a nation has a violent overthrow and executions, the next transition of power is likewise violent, borrowing the rhetoric from the first transition to justify the next.

______________________________

Excellent analysis. I totally agree.

Sadly, our enemies have already crossed the Rubicon, abandoning any pretense of following the rule of law.

Note, for example, these infamous FBI instant messages:

FBI Employee 3: "As I have initiated the destruction of the republic... Would you be so kind as to have a coffee with me this afternoon?"
FBI Employee 1: "I never really liked the Republic anyway."

No matter how good an example POTUS and Q set for future generations, our enemies will ignore it and do as they like.

I'm not sure how to deal with this problem (legally). But I'm sure POTUS does. I trust the Plan.

Disestablishmentarian writes: I am starting to think we have been deliberately hit with a bioweapon.

A good insight, Dis, but a little late in the game. Read the Q drops. “This move was predictable.”

___________________________________

Disestablishmentarian wrote: Granted, the direct medical danger from the virus is way overblown. But that hardly matters, if a crashing stock market takes us into recession which in turn defeats our President.

Hmmm. On one level, I guess you have a point. If something were to happen that would cause us to lose, then I guess NOTHING would really matter, would it? Because then the cabal would be in control.

We would all be exterminated by various bio-, nano-, chemical-, directed-energy-, and other depopulation technologies.

Anyone who survived would be tracked down by remote sensing satellites; rounded up by specially-vaccinated, mind-controlled mercenaries; tortured to death on snuff videos so rich psychos could get their kicks; sold into sex slavery; sent off to slave breeding camps; served up as appetizers at spirit banquets; sacrificed to Baphomet, and all sorts of other bad things. /sarcasm

You're right, Dis. If the enemy wins, then nothing will matter. Gotcha.

But what makes you think our POTUS is going to let that happen?

___________________________________

Disestablishmentarian writes: China (and its globalist allies) would have calculated all of this in advance.

Oh, I get it. You're saying that Trump will be defeated because “China (and its globalist allies)” have a Plan while our POTUS supposedly DOESN'T. Gotcha.

I see from some of your earlier posts that you don't have much confidence in our President's plans.

No wonder you're so frightened all the time!

As for me and my house, I trust the Plan.

SUGGESTION: Read the Q drops. Get redpilled. It’s not too late.

P.S. By any chance, are you an Objectivist? Or something similar? There is an ideological edge to some of your arguments whose bouquet I can’t quite identify.

DrDude wrote:

I find it disheartening that Durham’s “investigation” has been changed to a “review”...

______________________________________________________________________

Actually, here's what Jim Jordan said, "His [Durham's] investigation is due to be completed sometime this summer."

Jordan used the word "investigation." It was the writer of the article who kept using the word "review," even though the writer admitted further down the page that, "The secretive review turned into a criminal investigation in the fall..."

So why keep calling it a "review," after it's been "turned into" a "criminal investigation?"

Fake news.

I never realized von Sydow had that depth.

__________________________________________________

Max von Sydow

Greatest Role: The French Alsatian assassin Joubert in Three Days of the Condor

Greatest Line: "This move was predictable."

"No coincidences." (Q3404)