Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Disestablishmentarian
Disestablishmentarian wrote:

Well, I disagree with the Anon on almost all of these points ... but ... there ARE some benefits...

________________________________________

I see what you did there, Dis.

You took the Anon's post — which was encouraging us to TRUST THE PLAN regarding the coronavirus — and you flipped it around backwards, telling us that we SHOULDN'T Trust the Plan.

Specifically, you countered the Anon by implying that, if the virus panic helped POTUS in any way, it was only due to random chance, NOT planning.

This is consistent with many of your other posts.

For instance, you previously stated that anyone who Trusts the Plan regarding the coronavirus is "cult-like" and should be shunned as a "wacko."

You further suggested that such "wackos" (I'm correcting your spelling of "wacko") should be marked or blacklisted somehow on this board, to ensure that no one will listen to them, and you proposed that the term "W-J WARNING" (i.e. Wack-Job Warning) should be used to distinguish "cult-like" posts from those written by non-cult-like posters such as yourself, whom you described as, "those of us who value Q normally."

In other words, you proposed dividing the Q movement into two opposing factions, "normal" vs. "cult-like."

When I politely and reasonably suggested to you that "trusting the plan" is not necessarily "cult-like," you became uncharacteristically tongue-tied and declined to respond.

Which brings us right back where we started.

Now... about your screenname.

According to CollinsDictionary.com, a disestablishmentarian is: "A person who favors the separation of church and state, esp. the withdrawal of special rights, status, and support granted an established church by a state; an advocate of disestablishing a state church."

So is that your big issue, Dis? You think churches have too many "special rights" here in America? That their "special rights" need to be reduced or withdrawn?

The only "conservatives" I know who think that's a big issue are Ayn Rand libertarians, i.e. Objectivists.

But you told me you weren't an Objectivist.

Hmmmm.

1,223 posted on 03/20/2020 1:49:08 PM PDT by venizelos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 705 | View Replies ]


To: venizelos

Word, Anon.
Word.


1,225 posted on 03/20/2020 1:53:51 PM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Scatology is serendipitous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1223 | View Replies ]

To: venizelos

Why don’t you stop posting me, venizelos.

You have no reading comprehension and I’m not going to read and respond to all your misstatements.

Have a nice life.


1,251 posted on 03/20/2020 3:41:20 PM PDT by Disestablishmentarian (the right of the people peaceably to assemble)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1223 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson