“There is no indication the I.R.S. challenged that initial claim, though that lack of scrutiny surprised tax experts consulted for this article. But in 2010, Mr. Trump and his tax advisers sought to extract further benefits from the Chicago project, executing a maneuver that would draw years of inquiry from the I.R.S. First, he shifted the company that owned the tower into a new partnership. Because he controlled both companies, it was like moving coins from one pocket to another. Then he used the shift as justification to declare $168 million in additional losses over the next decade.”
This is BS and a perfectly common business tactic.
He didn’t “double dip” the write off. He wrote off the BUILDING investment. The 168 million deductions on the new company come from OPERATING investments from year to year by the NEW company that took over the building.
It doesn’t matter if it’s still “him” taking the deductions. LEGALLY it’s a different entity.
And the IRS still won’t investigate Biden or Clinton…
05/11/2024 10:26:38 AM PDT
· 8 of 32 Skywise
to Mr. Mojo
Brown man eats banana in middle of brown protesters while going against the narrative - he’s a raciss, silence him!
The bananas at the protest in the US weren’t racist either - it was because one of the Hamas supporters supposedly had a banana allergy and demanded nobody eat bananas while he was protesting.
Ok... I’m not an economist or financial advisor (though I did sleep at a holiday inn last night...) but... if they’re “vacant”...they’re not PAYING for those positions anyway so how does that save money?
Then you fail the understanding of the purpose of reunification and history in general and, back to the original point, why these men’s names were on the schools to begin with.