Free Republic

I was just over on the Democratic Underground site to see what they might be saying about Sarah Paulin, and I noticed something very peculiar about the people who post there - they don't post complete thoughts. I went through thread after thread, and they were all alike. I had logged on there hoping to read some provocative commentary and to get a feel for what hard-core leftists are thinking, but I couldn't find any posts of any substance - no insightful or well-thought out comments. For the most part, people there just type a little blurb in the heading...

The wicked witch is dead!

Thanks.

I've read a lot of posts on this forum dealing with Texas Republicans crossing over and voting in the Rat primaries. There seems to be two evenly divided camps here; those who want Hillary to win, and those who want Obama to win. If this is the case, then all of those votes will simply cancel each other out.

Dick Morris contends that Hillary would be disastrous for this nation and is encouraging Texas Republicans to cross over on March 5th and vote for Obama. Rush Limbaugh contends that keeping Hillary and Obama running neck and neck would fracture the Democratic Party and is encouraging Texas Republicans to cross over and vote for Hillary. What if a roughly even number of Texas Republicans in both camps votes for either Hillary or Obama? Nothing will have been accomplished.

Hubris, the ineradicable flaw that helps humans to clutch defeat from the jaws of victory, has played merry havoc with this eventful US presidential primary season.

Yes, the alleged large voter turn out in Iraq is all very nice, but the important question is, what does Ted Kennedy think?

Here's an active Dummycrat Forum with all the usual Bush haters and conspiracy theorists. It's like the DU except you don't have to register to post. It's a bonafide free-for-all. I personally find it exhilerating to get in there and mix it up. Try to educate some of these bozos. Democrat Discussion Forum

There's so much being said about Red vs. Blue states, it's beginning to sound as though the entire population of the red states voted for President Bush and the entire population of the blue states voted for Kerry. It’s as though the red states are comprised entirely of neanderthal, bible-thumping rednecks, and the blue states are comprised entirely of the intellectual, all-knowing, global-aware elites. Well, I did a summary of the Blue states and it turns out that 24,839,492 bible-thumping neanderthals from those states voted for George W. Bush. In looking at the Blue states, they comprise most of the...

There's so much being said about Red vs. Blue states, it's beginning to sound as though the red states are comprised entirely of neanderthal, bible-thumping rednecks, and the blue states are comprised entirely of the intellectual, all-knowing, global-aware elites. Well, I did a summary of the Blue states and it turns out that 24,839,492 bible-thumping neanderthals from those states voted for George W. Bush. In looking at the Blue states, they comprise most of the largest cities in the country – Los Angeles, New York, Detroit, etc., i.e., the government handout crowd coupled with their liberal sympathizers. In D.C., George...

There's so much being said about Red vs. Blue states, it's beginning to sound as though the red states are comprised entirely of neanderthal, bible-thumping rednecks, and the blue states are comprised entirely of the intellectual, all-knowing, global-aware elites. Well, I did a summary of the Blue states and it turns out that 24,839,492 bible-thumping neanderthals from those states voted for George W. Bush. In looking at the Blue states, they comprise the largest cities in the country - Detroit, New York, Baltimore, etc., i.e., the government handout crowd coupled with their liberal sympathizers. In D.C., George got less than...

I've been popping into "Air America" for giggles and to listen to the melt-down of Al Franken & Co. A hot topic over there is something about "25 Million Negative Votes" in Ohio - computer votes or something. Anyone know anything about this?

Dan Rather, Terry McCauliffe, The Democratic Underground, Tom Daschle, Mary Maples, Al Franken, Tereza Heinz, Al Sharpton, Ted Kennedy, Mary Beth Cahill, The New York Times, and, honorable mention, John F'n' Kerry:

For weeks, now, I've heard John Kerry say over and over again, "I will hunt down terrorists and kill them." Notice that this line has been repeated again and again ever since the Clintonistas moved in and took over Kerry's campaign. Throughout August, Kerry's campaign was faltering as he waffled all over the place. And then, all of a sudden, (coinciding with the infusion of the Clintonistas), Kerry suddenly, "Has consistently always had one message," which everyone knows is an absolute lie. We can only conclude that his "consistent, one message" is what the Clintonistas have told him to say....

The figures highlighted in (green?)at the top of the polls are the most current. They determine the RCP Average. Since the last debate, George W has been steadily climbing. As an added attraction, here is a public service: Tired of that frayed, smudgy, multi-copied conversion chart tacked to your wall? Here's a free, full-colored, 8 1/2 x 11 Fractions to Decimals Conversion Chart

I'm listening to the Hugh Hewitt radio show and he just interviewed Congressman Cox of California who raised the very real prospect of a Congressional Hearing concerning "Forgery Gate". Chris Cox stated that, although it is likely there could be a Congressional Hearing, it is unlikely that it would occur until after the election.....unless there is a large outcry from the public demanding such a hearing immediately. Hugh Hewitt is calling on people to call your Congressman and demand a Congressional Hearing next week. If enough voices are heard, it will happen. He also suggests calling Congressman Joe Barton of...

Danny: But it wasn't a dream. They were real documents, and you and you and you saw them........

By now, the proof is incontrovertible that the "Bush Documents" are fraudulent. In fact, I saw a comparison between Lt Col Killian's real signature and that of the forged document on Fox News. Not even close! It didn't even take a handwriting expert to point out the glaring differences. Ok, so someone typed up false documents and forged a Lt Colonel's signature - all in an attempt to defame the President of the United States. Dan Blather and CBS will not identify their source. This sounds somewhat to me like a crime has been commited. So, my question is, is...

If the presidential election were held this week, who would you vote for?