And just as there is (was) no year 0, there is no “st’ in the date you list, “The new decade will not begin until
January 1st, 2011.” It is simply January 21, 2011. Look at your calendar or this morning’s newspaper. Your “st” is unnecessary, redundant, superfluous, and highly affected.
Just for review, it would be the first (1st) day of January, but the actual date, is simply January 1.
11/10/2009 6:33:34 PM PST
· 7 of 7 Root66
to Simcox
I don’t believe someone who is running a bogus campaign for senator so he can bag all those campaign funds is going to have any input whatsoever on the Supreme Court.
You ask what is thought of Simcox? I think he is a phony candidate who filed papers to run simply because he could use his national name to get donations to his campaign and walk off with them once he ducks out of the race. Nothing says he has to return the contributions, so he is selling piecemeal his reputation at $25 per contribution.
Talking sense to Simcox is like tilting with windmills. This is my first post to FR and I’m trying to get the gist of this thread. But whatever the discussion, it must be pointed out that Simcox is NOT running for any office. Simcox declared his candidacy simply to garner checks to his campaign much like the ploy of building a bogus fence and having donors pad his bank account. Simcox cannot be found to be seriously campaigning anywhere except hitting lonely hearts’ clubs full of gullible seniors who give him their money. He is not accountable for a dime, and when he predictably drops out of the race, he takes the bucks with him. Same tactic perennial presidential candidate Alan Keyes has used to build an untouchable war chest. My advice is to steer clear of Simcox.