Free Republic

FYI

FYI

FYI

FYI

Bump!

Please see reply #5. Thanks.

Mohammed Atta met in Bagdad before 9/11 with Saddam Hussein according to Richard Perle of the Defense Advsiory board (story posted on FR yesterday).

Why isn't Bush making the case to the American people, to the UN and Europe that the US has the right of self defense agsinst Iraq given Iraq and Saddam roles in 9/11, OKC bombing and the 1993 WTC attack?

Why isn't Bush using Perl's info and the evidence posited in the lawsuit described by this article?

9/11 SUIT TIES SADDAM TO 10 YRS. OF AID FOR OSAMA

New York Post ^ | 9/09/02 | JOHN LEHMANN

Posted on 09/09/2002 1:05 AM Pacific by kattracks

September 9, 2002 -- Iraq sponsored Osama bin Laden's terrorists for 10 years leading up to the Sept. 11 attacks by supplying high-powered weapons, fake passports and training in airline hijackings, court papers say. Saddam Hussein's sons, Qusay and Uday Hussein, are portrayed as key players in the terror alliance, convincing their father that an Iraq-al Qaeda partnership was the most effective weapon in deflecting U.S. attempts to topple his regime and inflicting revenge for the humiliating Gulf War defeat.

Baghdad's relations with bin Laden had become so intimate in the months before the World Trade Center attack that a top Iraqi doctor, kidney specialist Mohammed Khayal, was dispatched to Afghanistan for three days in May 2001, to treat bin Laden's kidney problems, the papers say.

The civil suit against Iraq, filed last week on behalf of 1,400 victims of the Sept. 11 attacks and their families, relies on confidential briefings by ex-CIA officers, interviews with Iraqi defectors, al Qaeda members' testimonies at the African embassy bombing trial and Iraqi and American press reports, according to Manhattan law firm Kreindler and Kreindler.

Before U.N. inspectors were thrown out in 1998, they suspected Iraq was training Islamic terrorists at a secret camp, known as Salman Pak, where simulated hijackings were allegedly carried out in a Boeing 707 fuselage.

U.S. intelligence officials cited in the $1 trillion lawsuit believe Iraqi intelligence agents had direct contact with at least two Sept. 11 hijackers, Zaid Samir Jarrah and Marwan al-Shehhi, in the United Arab Emirates in the spring of 2000, only weeks before the pair arrived in America.

Mohammed Atta met in Bagdad before 9/11 with Saddam Hussein according to Richard Perle of the Defense Advsiory board (story posted on FR yesterday).

Why isn't Bush making the case to the American people, to the UN and Europe that the US has the right of self defense agsinst Iraq given Iraq and Saddam roles in 9/11, OKC bombing and the 1993 WTC attack? Why isn't Bush using Perl's info and the evidence posited in the lawsuit described by the article for this thread?

Please read the following editorial:

"America Should Act in Self Defense Against Iraq For 9/11,OKC,1993 WTC Attacks"

Personal Reserach, interviews and Opinions by Author ^ |

September 5, 2002 | Patrick B. Briley Posted on 09/05/2002 3:06 PM Pacific by OKCSubmariner

Saddam Hussein of Iraq hired mercenaries from Baluchistan for his war on terror against the US even before the 1991 Gulf War.

Saddam’s Baluchi mercenaries have been very successful in attacking American targets and killing innocent American citizens in the 9/11, OKC and 1993 WTC Attacks.

Khalid Mohammed and his nephew Ramzi Yousef were Saddam’s Baluchi mercenaries who attacked America for Saddam and Iraq.

Middle East expert Lorie Mylroie has given eloquent proofs over the years of Saddam’s involvement in the 1993 WTC attack.

The FBI and DOJ publicly say Khalid Mohammed was a mastermind behind the 9/11 attacks and the 1993 WTC bombing.

Ramzi Yousef is in Federal prison for his bombing of the WTC in 1993.

The FBI and DOJ and Bush White House have not yet told you that Khalid Mohammed was a mastermind of the OKC bombing and behind the meetings of Terry Nichols in the Philippines to plan the OKC bombing. They have not yet told you that the Abu Sayeff cell in the Philippines run by Khalid Mohammed and Ramzi yousef was filled with Iraqi agents besides just Khalid Mohammed and Yousef. In December 1995 the Philippine police arrested nine members of the Abu Sayeff terror group. Six of the nine members arrested were identified by the Philippine authorities to the US government as Iraqi agents. So counting Khalid Mohammed and Ramzi Yousef, there were at least eight Iraqi agents involved in the Abu Sayef cell in the Philippines that helped Nichols plan and carry out the OKC bombing.

There is now a public debate about whether or not to go to war against Iraq and Saddam. The debate so far has been framed and deliberately limited by the White House and in Congress as to whether or not Saddam has weapons of mass destruction and if he will in the future use them sooner rather than later against the US.

It is possible that Congress and the American people and the world will not be adequately persuaded of the need to remove Saddam now based solely on the weapons of mass destruction arguments that may not yet be compelling and verifiable enough to enough people.

The case should be made by the White House to Congress and to the American people and to the world (UN, Europe,etc.) that the US has the right of self defense for the acts of war committed by Saddam and Iraq against Americans in the 9/11 attacks, the OKC bombing and the 1993 WTC attack. In fact these acts of war against the US are vastly more compelling and provable than weapons of mass destruction that Saddam has hidden but cannot be completely verified.

The FBI and CIA and previous administrations have many skeletons in their closet for their connivance, for their not stopping, and for their not telling the American people about the role of Iraq in the 9/11, OKC and 1993 WTC attacks against America. Please see my article “FBI and DOJ Connivance Permeates, Interconnects Terror Attacks” on the FreeRepublic.com dated August 15, 2002.

The White House should immediately and urgently make the strongest case possible against Saddam and Iraq, namely Saddam’s use of Iraqi agents in the attacks on Americans. If the White House fails to do so out of trying to protect FBI and administration failures in the past, then the White House would be performing a great disservice to America and could be held responsible for future Iraq attacks on Americans if the result should be that action is not taken against Iraq and Saddam soon enough

The White House should first worry about saving Americans from Iraq and Saddam before the White House worries about saving political careers and failed FBI and DOJ officials. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FYI

The Khalid Mohammed plans to attack US nuclear facilities along with plans for the OKC bombing, and the 9/11 attacks were on his nephew's (Ramzi Yousef)computer recovered by the FBI in January 1995 in the Philippines where Khalid was living with Ramzi.

The FBI has known the details of Khalid's and Ramzi's plans for certain since February 1995. Khalid took helicopter and scuba lessons. Scuba divers could be be used to poison water supplies or attack nuclear facilities, especially water cooling intakes or even nuclear powered ships and subs.

Khalid and Ramzi were Baluchistan mercanries hired by Saddam Hussein to do the 1993 WTC and OKC attacks. Khalid was a mastermind of the 9/11 attacks according to the FBI and DOJ. The only thing left on Ramzi's computer that Khalid has not yet done is a nuclear incident (like the Three Mile island accident) where radioactive effluent could be released from a damaged nuclear power plant ( form of a dirty nuke) that would cause evacuation, terror,ground water contamination and hurt the economy. I would not take these terrorist's word for it that they have given up attacking US nuclear facilities.

The US should take action against Iraq becasue of what Khalid and Ramzi have done for Iraq against the US. Please see my editorial "America Should Act in Self Defense Against Iraq For 9/11,OKC,1993 WTC Attacks " posted on FR on 9/5/02.

More details on what Khalid and Ramzi have done please see my article "FBI and DOJ COnnivance Permeates, Interconnects Terror Attacks" posted on FR on 8/15/02.

FYI

Was this FBI connivance or ineptitude? Likely both.

Connivance is the knowledge of and the consent to (active or passive) wrongdoing when it is known and the repsonsibility to oppose the wrongdoing.

Please see my article "DOJ and FBI COnnivance Permaetes. Interconnects Terror Attacks" posted 8/15/02 on FreeRepublic.com that reveals active FBI connivance in the 9/11, 1993 WTC and OKC Bombing attacks. In that article it is also revealed how another FBI informant, Aukae Collins, for 9/11 hijacker Hanny Hanjour, was the basis of an FBI memo and later a CIA memo from FBI agent Ken Williams in Phoenix. The results of the memo warning of AlQaeda and BIn Laden airliner attacks inside the US reached President Bush on Aug 6, 2002 in a briefing by Condoleeza Rice.

BUMP

FYI

BUMP

Thanks for the ping.

America Should Act in Self Defense Against Iraq For 9/11,OKC,1993 WTC Attacks

Personal Reserach, interviews and Opinions by Author ^ | September 5, 2002 | Patrick B. Briley

Posted on 09/05/2002 3:06 PM Pacific by OKCSubmariner

Saddam Hussein of Iraq hired mercenaries from Baluchistan for his war on terror against the US even before the 1991 Gulf War.

Saddam’s Baluchi mercenaries have been very successful in attacking American targets and killing innocent American citizens in the 9/11, OKC and 1993 WTC Attacks.

Khalid Mohammed and his nephew Ramzi Yousef were Saddam’s Baluchi mercenaries who attacked America for Saddam and Iraq.

Middle East expert Lorie Mylroie has given eloquent proofs over the years of Saddam’s involvement in the 1993 WTC attack.

The FBI and DOJ publicly say Khalid Mohammed was a mastermind behind the 9/11 attacks and the 1993 WTC bombing.

Ramzi Yousef is in Federal prison for his bombing of the WTC in 1993.

The FBI and DOJ and Bush White House have not yet told you that Khalid Mohammed was a mastermind of the OKC bombing and behind the meetings of Terry Nichols in the Philippines to plan the OKC bombing. They have not yet told you that the Abu Sayeff cell in the Philippines run by Khalid Mohammed and Ramzi yousef was filled with Iraqi agents besides just Khalid Mohammed and Yousef. In December 1995 the Philippine police arrested nine members of the Abu Sayeff terror group. Six of the nine members arrested were identified by the Philippine authorities to the US government as Iraqi agents. So counting Khalid Mohammed and Ramzi Yousef, there were at least eight Iraqi agents involved in the Abu Sayef cell in the Philippines that helped Nichols plan and carry out the OKC bombing.

There is now a public debate about whether or not to go to war against Iraq and Saddam. The debate so far has been framed and deliberately limited by the White House and in Congress as to whether or not Saddam has weapons of mass destruction and if he will in the future use them sooner rather than later against the US.

It is possible that Congress and the American people and the world will not be adequately persuaded of the need to remove Saddam now based solely on the weapons of mass destruction arguments that may not yet be compelling and verifiable enough to enough people.

The case should be made by the White House to Congress and to the American people and to the world (UN, Europe,etc.) that the US has the right of self defense for the acts of war committed by Saddam and Iraq against Americans in the 9/11 attacks, the OKC bombing and the 1993 WTC attack. In fact these acts of war against the US are vastly more compelling and provable than weapons of mass destruction that Saddam has hidden but cannot be completely verified.

The FBI and CIA and previous administrations have many skeletons in their closet for their connivance, for their not stopping, and for their not telling the American people about the role of Iraq in the 9/11, OKC and 1993 WTC attacks against America. Please see my article “FBI and DOJ Connivance Permeates, Interconnects Terror Attacks” on the FreeRepublic.com dated August 15, 2002.

The White House should immediately and urgently make the strongest case possible against Saddam and Iraq, namely Saddam’s use of Iraqi agents in the attacks on Americans. If the White House fails to do so out of trying to protect FBI and administration failures in the past, then the White House would be performing a great disservice to America and could be held responsible for future Iraq attacks on Americans if the result should be that action is not taken against Iraq and Saddam soon enough.

The White House should first worry about saving Americans from Iraq and Saddam before the White House worries about saving political careers and failed FBI and DOJ officials. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FYI and please see reply #110 also.

BUMP for entire thread.

BUMP for entire thread.