Free Republic

That's because you're going in the wrong direction....

I'm not a darwinist. It requires too much blind faith.

Heck yeah. I'll judge any and all evidence and follow where it leads, even to non-natural causes.

Real scienitist aren't afraid of debate....but religious nuts are...

When you don't have the evidence, pound the table!

I do follow. Analogous to millions of microsoft computer errors producing more adaptive programs.
Sure!

And these adaptations you refer to are the product of DNA mistakes?

Losing DNA information is not a positive step.
I'll come back tomorrow.....

You got something interesting to say, say it. I've chased too many of these links to find nothing much there.

Word tricks. If it's not guided, it's random

It is useless to discuss science with True Believer Darwinites who will not see the difference between a lawlike crystal and a non-lawlike cell.
And you Ardemt Evolution Devotees should quit trying to tell me that shining energy on something makes it organize and complexify. Energy, unguided, DEstructs, not Constructs

It is useless to discuss science with True Believer Darwinites who will not see the difference between a lawlike crystal and a non-lawlike cell.
And you Ardemt Evolution Devotees should quit trying to tell me that shining energy on something makes it organize and complexify. Energy, unguided, DEstructs, not Constructs

We've been here before. Please...a single example of a positive mutation

I'm not interested in talking about God all the time like you darwinites.
I want to know what makes you think evolution happens when it is obvious from the real world that things do not become more organized, but rather the reverse.

I'm trying to be patient here...but if not chance, then what mind is directing away from random?

I dunno about yer creationists, or yer genesis..
but I am unconvinced of darwinian alchemy from
simple base to complex value, by mere chance.

What has that got to do with the scientific problems of darwinism?

You know, I more and more believe this obsession with darwin's preposterous suggestion is based almost wholly on resistance to ANY Higher Power.

I didn't say anything about Genesis. I follow scientific evidence. Threfor O.J. did it and darwin didn't.

Where's the transitional form for an insect?
How do we get from a tree shrew to a primate.
You see 'evidence'?