"He went on to argue that this approach revives “the value judgments of a racist, misogynistic, homophobic society and constrains the value judgments of contemporary judges,” a critique that echoes the concerns of some legal scholars who decry the originalist philosophy as out of touch with modern values."
This guy is all about the Living Breathing Constitution Crapola. Kind of exactly the opposite of Originalism, but hey, he's a Lawyer so he knows . . . Strong Ganja in Hawaii-
“Whats the point of laws if the political classes can just change them to fit an agenda”
But that’s what “Laws” are. Just word on paper.
If The People don’t defend the Laws, then the Laws can’t defend The People.
It’s a paraphrase of a recent X post I read. Sorry, I don’t recall the original poster.
(At least I acknowledge another writer, unlike our Harvard Betters.)