Free Republic

Was that a typo - should it have read "muddle ground consensus"?

So far, in Canada, dead liberals don't get to vote.

But martin has been seen associating with clinton, so who knows - that may be the next addition to the ole liberal bag of tricks.

Yo, Mikey Moore:

I am responding to your blatant inept attempt at intrusion into Canadian politics, as exemplified by the following quote attributed to you -

"Far be it from me, as an American, to suggest what you should do. I hope you don't feel this appeal of mine is too intrusive, but I just couldn't sit by, as your friend, and say nothing."

Please let me comment - if you won't, I'll do it anyway.

No, I don't "feel" that your appeal is too intrusive - I damn well THINK and KNOW that it is!

And please refrain from any reference to yourself as my "friend" - with friends like you, no one needs enemies!

But to reciprocate with a friendly bit of advice - stick to producing crockumentaries!

The Buzzards are beginning to circle!

"The ad was pulled because the ad was pulled, and because there were better ads - that's essentially it," Martin said ............... - a subject he joked he has trouble understanding.

---

Gee, I'm surprised that Martin has admitted to having trouble understanding this subject. This articulate "wannabe prime minister" has been sooooooo succinct in explaining in simplistic terms why the ad was pulled - "because it was pulled". It appears as though Martin believes that he has actually provided a valid answer. Yes, I can see how confused he is!

Maybe the RCMP should be called in to administer a few alcohol and drug tests to determine whether this leader (and I use that term loosely) is fit to lead.

---

The ad was pulled from the Liberal party's English website, but a French version, minus the drums, remained on the party's French website as late as Wednesday afternoon and has also aired on television in Quebec.

---

Maybe a possible explanation for this "apparent oversight" would be that Martin misplaced the phone number for the Quebec Media, that he really didn't have time to bother recalling those ads, or that he didn't think that anyone in Quebec would actually bother to view or understand those ads.

Lastly, with regard to the liberal theme of these so-called "Choose Your Canada" ads, was that a typo error? Maybe Martin's real intent is "Goose your Canada"!

In light of the second french revolution now occurring throughout france, rumours abound!
Is there any truth to these following reports?

1. Chirac is now wondering whatever happened to the french foreign legion?

2. Chirac has responded to the burning of Paris by considering registering to learn how to play the fiddle?

3. Chirac has officially declared that the flounder is france’s national fish, and regards it as a fitting example for all to emulate.

4. Chirac has ordered the Renault and Peugeot car plants to double their vehicle production in order to appease the rioting malcontent patriots who might be offended by a lack of available vehicles to set afire.

5. Chirac has flipped a coin, 2 out of 3 times, and officially declared arson, rioting, and baseball to be new french national sports, and has proposed that everyone be provided with their own baseball bat to foster a new physical activity initiative?

6. Chirac is actively searching for Bagdad Bob to offer him the position of french national propaganda minister.

7. John Kerry, who has been commissioned by the french government to draw up an unconditional offer of surrender, intends to rush to Europe to conduct a straw poll to determine whether there is universal agreement on this subject.

8. The U.N. will convene an emergency meeting of its Security Council to immediately propose at the next occurrence of a blue moon that the issue of insurrection in france be tabled for discussion at a later date, sometime this century?

9. The french government has proposed the adoption of a new national flag - white, with a crescent (croissant) emblazoned on it, to demonstrate submission to the radical muslim world?

10. The french government has proposed that the Arc de Triomphe be renamed the Arc de Capitulation?

11. The french parliament has proposed the adoption a new national anthem - Mad jihadists from Armentiers, Parlez Vous?

12. The french parliament is reconsidering the advantages and disadvantages of referring to their capitol city as Gay Paris?


13. The french tourist industry is trying to encourage foreigners to visit Paris by describing the arson activities as fascinating multi location pyrotechnic displays.

14. The french parliament will ensure that, in order to foster universal human rights, radical muslim jihadists be designated and protected as a visible majority.

15. The french parliament is considering reinstating the death penalty for non radical muslims by resurrecting the guillotine as the preferred method of execution, so as to foster an appreciation of middle east culture?

16. The french parliament will commission a new cemetery - Flounders Fields - to inter all french politicians who do not show any signs of mental or physical activity for at least one week, or maybe two or three..........?

17. The french army, in recognition of a need to improve relations with Americans, intends to introduce a new marching tune, an adaptation of a popular Charlie Daniels song, which will be called - The Devil Came Down to Paris ....................... he was looking for a soul to steal?

18. The french minister of foreign affairs, Pepe Le Pieu, has decided to emigrate to LaLa Land, and John Kerry is scheduled to officially welcome him as a true democrat?

19. Chirac is actively seeking asylum in Russia, but only on the condition that his unlimited supply of foie gras continues uninterrupted?

Is Chris Core (whoever he is) gay?

Will the MSM care to investigate that possibility?

If he is gay, did that "gayness" enable him to instantly recognize that another person is gay?

Does it really matter?

OK Dogfighter:

I'll start the ball rolling.

From the ACLU's own website, these are the, let's call them "head honchos", for lack of a better term.

Anthony D. Romero, Executive Director
Nadine Strossen, President of the ACLU
Steven Shapiro, Legal Director of the ACLU
Caroline Fredrickson, Director of the Washington Legislative Office
Donna McKay, Director of Development
Geri E. Rozanski, Director of Affiliate Support
Emily Tynes, Communications Director

Would anyone care to "Google" them, or else, add to The List?

I love it when a plan comes together!

Let's give the ACLU some free publicity - would this site be willing to post, on a weekly basis, an updated list of the names of lawyers and law firms which promote ACLU issues in court?

I'm sure that some of their neighbours would appreciate the opportunity to discuss various issues with them at the local restaurant, bar, supermarket, bank, sports arena, school, etc.

Is there a website moderator in the house?

This guy is one heck of a marathon runner.

I thought that he was still running for the 2004 election.

Who says we have to keep a person alive in a terribly disabled state..when half their brain has liquified and they have no chance of becoming a whole person again?

Please try to be factual. What evidence do you have to support your statement that "half their brain has liquified"? Maybe none of the person's brain has liquified.
Or maybe one tenth.

Also, by your standard, would you classify any and all mentally challenged individuals as having "no chance of becoming a whole person again".

What should society and/or the courts do in these instances - humanely (sarcasm) starve them all to death?

Happy Easter!

You pose an interesting tactic.

To offer some "additional ammunition" - Has judge greer failed to declare a conflict of interest in hearing this case, since his wife is reported to be one of the executive for the hospice at which Terri is being held hostage, and summarily executed in a manner by which even the SPCA (Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals) should find repugnant.

Due to his court decision, could judge greer be charged with conspiracy to commit murder?

Maybe if he were to be handcuffed and thrown into a jail cell, and denied any food and water, ............ maybe then he might begin to realize that starving to death would be painful.

Has this eminent (and I use this term loosely, ......... very loosely) judge ever been required to submit to any substance abuse investigation?

Gee - allegations without proof!

Has this communist taken a page from the democrat party handbook?

Maybe Judge Greer should likewise be starved.

If he can inhumanely demand that Terri Schiavo be forced to starve to death, maybe employees in any restaurants or supermarkets which he frequents could show their opposition to his edict by refusing to serve or sell any food to him.

Instead of being typically Canadian by meekly submitting to the agenda of our political manipulators, we Canadians can effectively express our opposition to same-sex "marriage".

I have emailed the following letter of dissent to Paul Martin, our (not so) prime minister, along with copies to Irwin Cotler, our minister of (in)justice, Stephen Harper, Conservative leader of the opposition, and my local liberal representative.

I invite and encourage other Canadians who oppose this proposed legislation to direct correspondence to their local representatives and other politicians.

The email address for any member of Parliament is
(MP's surname).(first initial)@parl.gc.ca.
As an example, our (not so) prime minister can be reached at Martin.P@parl.gc.ca.



Hello:

In addressing this correspondence to you, I have refrained from using the salutation "Right Honourable" before your name. I believe that such a term of respect must be earned, and not merely conveyed due to political niceties! Maybe this is my litmus test for you.

As a Canadian citizen, I am appalled by the wanton decision of several Canadian appointed judges to attempt to rewrite history by granting "marriage" licenses to homosexual partners. By their blatant disregard for the law, not only do they consider themselves above the law, they have even deemed themselves to be the makers of the law. And the spineless politicians who have abdicated their responsibility to maintain accountability, are no less contemptible.

The collective motto of this band of incompetents, as demonstrated by their actions and inactions, appears to be - Let the Canadian public be held hostage! They will get used to it!

Most proponents of homosexual "marriage" condemn the established law governing the issuance of marriage licenses as discrimination based on gender or sexual preference.


These laws do discriminate, as they should, with regard to - the applicants’ gender, age (both must be adults), blood relationship (no first degree relatives), current marital status (currently not married to someone else), sanity, sobriety, consciousness, mutual freedom and willingness to marry, and type of relationship (currently monogamous).

If homosexual "marriage" is to be sanctioned, I’m sure that there soon will be other challenges to dispel these other discriminations. What will be next - pedophile or polygamous "marriages"?

This issue surely will be our country’s Pandora’s Box!

If Canadians allows rogue judicial and political mavericks to redefine a concept so integral to society as marriage in the pretext of eliminating discrimination, what is next?

In our society which is driven by feelings as opposed to ethical considerations, should the long established definitions of mother, father, son, daughter, male, female, and even black and white also be changed to avoid offence?

Should society really discriminate against any mother who would prefer to be called a "father"? Or how about a mother who really wanted to have a daughter, but instead gave birth to a son? Should she be encouraged to refer to him as she so wishes?

Likewise, should a male be free to declare himself/herself "female"?

If some people regard all discrimination with disdain, should all discrimination be eliminated?

Most importantly, what will be the long-term effect of legitimizing homosexual "marriage"? Will it reinforce the false belief that marriage and parenthood are unrelated?


In a heterosexual marriage, children are afforded exposure to the specific thoughts, behaviours, experiences, outlooks, and affections that usually differentiate male from female psyches. In a homosexual union, children probably will be exposed to and thereby assimilate only the views espoused by either their male or female "parents". Balance and diversity will be lacking. Do gays and lesbians truly value the concept of "diversity", or is it merely a useful tool to foist their lifestyle on a non-questioning, non-caring, passive, predominantly heterosexual society?

Some individuals have referred to the issue of redefining marriage as a "slippery slope". Maybe a precipice would be a truer analogy!


We, in Canada, have had much of our behaviour and many of our activities interpreted according to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms (a real Pandora’s Box ensuring employment for any and all lawyers). That really changed our society, and I doubt that it was beneficial to us, as Canadians. We even lack a national identity now. Our only identifiable characteristic is our mandated complacency to accept everything as defined according to a "politically correct" manipulative agenda.

As elected representatives, you have a responsibility to be firstly a person of honour, and secondly to express and effect the collective interests of your constituents. Hopefully you will assume this task without looking for a convenient excuse to shirk your duty and to hide from accountability.

Since several provincial courts have rushed to honour same sex "marriages", you now have the authority and power to hold those rogue magistrates accountable for their usurped actions. You can ensure that the band of incompetents are held accountable for their personal agenda, and enable them to apologize to the Canadian populace.


merely a Canadian who continues to learn, and wonders "why and why not"!

Obviously you've had (more than?) one too many already!

Jerry Springer calling anything immoral - sorry, that does not compute!