Free Republic

“I’m curious what you find disagreeable. A lot of what I’m reading makes sense.”

Jeff,

A lot of people who call themselves Conservatives, or ‘Tea Party’, are actually relatvely new to the movement.

Most of them are old Establishment folks who still think there is a ‘real difference’ between Dempublicans and Republicrats. You and I know better.

That’s why we do indeed see a lot more sense in the Ron Paul campaign than in the others. We saw it in 2008 too when he ran.

Ron Paul 2012 ... 30 Years of Consistency - Sovereignty for America

Ron Paul gaining traction.

Has the Establishment on both sides worried.

“You need to take a careful look at the International Community...in all aspects.”

This kind of reply really kills me. That’s precisely how Liberals answer Conservatives.

Is there any question that Gingrich supporters are really Liberals in disguise?

Internationalism = Globalism = Communism

Ron Paul 2012 ... American Constitutional Soveriegnty

“Like I said I have no desire to turn you in ...”

Whew ... I was getting worried there for a moment.

Again, you have added nothing to this discussion other than a spooky sense of paranoia and some childish name calling.

You are a wonderful ambassador for Gingrich.

“Newt’s first wife is not dead.”

Answer:

Exactly my point.

Gingrich was not sincere enough about his marriage oath (till death do us part), that he wouldn’t break it.

We absolutely know for a fact that Gingrich does not honor sacred oaths very seriously.

“Scofield note on Daniel 9:24

...”

Answer:

This proves the entire point of my article.

Dispensationalists place more authority in the corrupt writings of Scofield than they do on the plain text of God.

I pray that you will repent of your Dispensational sin.

“No, the church isn’t a eternal age, Eph.3:21 is speaking of the church (using a metophor) being a temple (1Co.6:19)not the age, which will end with the pre-trib rapture”

Answer:

Ephesians 3 says nothing of the kind about a temple.

You have deliberately misrepresented God’s word here.

“You are the definition of a Paultard retread.”

Ah ... er ... ahem.

Is the best reply you can come up with?

I challenged you to check with the moderator. Apparently truth means nothing to you.

No wonder you advocate a Globalist Liberal like Gingrich.

“As said, gloablism is not going away”

So you are consigning yourself to Toffler communism?

I’m happy to see that you exposed yourself so openly.

Ron Paul will follow the Constitution and respect the Sovereign Nation, States, and individual.

He will NOT be a Globalist Liberal like Gingrich who seeks to goad this country into more wars, further weakening this Nation into bankruptcy, and in the process implement the Toffler communist ‘Third Wave’ agenda.

Internationalism = Globalism = Communism

They accomplish this through endless wars and conflicts that bankrupt Nations.

That’s why they called it the ‘Communist INTERNATIONAL’.

Gingrich is a Globalist.

Ron Paul is a Sovereignist.

Ron Paul 2012 - Defending America’s Sovereignty

“Can you please tell me how RP is strong on America’s defense, because I just do not see it.
Please enlighten us.”

As Commander-in-Chief, Dr. Paul will lead the fight to:

* Make securing our borders the top national security priority.

* Avoid long and expensive land wars that bankrupt our country by using constitutional means to capture or kill terrorist leaders who helped attack the U.S. and continue to plot further attacks.

* Guarantee our intelligence community’s efforts are directed toward legitimate threats and not spying on innocent Americans through unconstitutional power grabs like the Patriot Act.

* End the nation-building that is draining troop morale, increasing our debt, and sacrificing lives with no end in sight.

* Follow the Constitution by asking Congress to declare war before one is waged.

* Only send our military into conflict with a clear mission and all the tools they need to complete the job – and then bring them home.

* Ensure our veterans receive the care, benefits, and honors they have earned when they return.

* Revitalize the military for the 21st century by eliminating waste in a trillion-dollar military budget.

* Prevent the TSA from forcing Americans to either be groped or ogled just to travel on an airplane and ultimately abolish the unconstitutional agency.

* Stop taking money from the middle class and the poor to give to rich dictators through foreign aid.

In short, he will follow the Constitution and respect the Sovereign Nation, States, and individual.

He will NOT be a Globalist Liberal like Gingrich who seeks to goad this country into more wars, further weakening this Nation into bankruptcy, and in the process implement the Toffler communist ‘Third Wave’ agenda.

Internationalism = Globalism = Communism

They accomplish this through endless wars and conflicts that bankrupt Nations.

That’s why they called it the ‘Communist INTERNATIONAL’.

Gingrich is a Globalist.

Ron Paul is a Sovereignist.

Ron Paul 2012 - Defending America’s Sovereignty

“As far as Gingrich, he had medical issues, they would not have taken him.

My husband volunteered and had medical issues. They would not take him - period.”

That’s the point. Gingrich didn’t even try to volunteer. I know many people in the Army who had disabilities that they could have got out on, but they still served proudly.

“I have zero idea about Gingrich’s marriage, if it was sincere or not and neither do you.”

We do know that ultimately it was not sincere. ... Till death do us part.

“Romney was able to avoid the draft because of his lds mission trip to France.
Gingrich had a medical deferment because of flat feet, and poor eye sight plus his was married and had children, in college which at that time was another kind of deferment.”

This is a canard.

Romney could have volunteered after his LDS obligation. Instead he walked away comfortably.

Gingrich could have volunteered when he was 17, long before marriage. The Army would have found him an MOS to compensate for his disabilities.

Moreover, Gingrich’s marriage, as we found out later, was not really that sincere.

Ron Paul 2012 ... strong on America’s defense - no entangling alliances.

“I just can’t place your old screen name, but your style is definitely familiar..”

You seem a little paranoid.

Could it be that Ron Paul has more support than you are willing to admit?

Could it be that you are now awakened to the fact that supporting Gingrich is tantamount to supporting the communist ‘Third Wave’ ideology, ... hence your paranoia?

You can check with the moderator to sort out your foolish imagination.

Good point.

And Ron Paul served honorably during the Viet Nam era.

Notice that the ‘big defense talkers’ and ‘foreign policy guys’ like Gingrich and Romney were nowhere to be found in the military when their country needed them back then. These guys ‘opted out’ just like Bill Clinton. No difference.

Talk is cheap. Gingrich and Romney are famous chickenhawks who talk a good game, but have no real principle.

Gingrich is enthusiastically supportive of the Toffler communists’ ‘Third Wave’ globalist regime. Is this someone whose ‘foreign policy’ you can trust?

The ‘Third Wave’ is treason by another name.

Ron Paul 2012 - a real conservative, a man of principle, and the military and veteran’s best friend.

“he said he refused to say if or not he’d go 3rd party because he likes to see the people squirm.”

Where did Ron Paul say he likes to see the people squirm?

I think you are a bit paranoid here.

If indeed, he were to run as a third party, then he would be the only true conservative in the race.

Obama is a Globalist Liberal. Romney and Gingrich are Globalist Liberals. They all agree on 95% of the issues and increased spending. The Global Liberals will own both horses in the race.

I want a conservative Constitutionalist choice.

Apparently you don’t want a conservative.

So you prefer a Globalist Liberal with public communist sympathies over a Contitutionalist?

What kind of conservatism is that?

Gingrich wrote the forward to the communist Toffler book, Creating a New Civilization: The Politics of the Third Wave, back in 1995 when he was speaker.

In it, he grieved at the lack of appreciation for “Toffler’s insight” in The Third Wave and blamed politicians who had not applied his model for the “frustration, negativism, cynicism and despair” of the political landscape.

We do not need another Globalist Liberal masquerading as a ‘conservative’.

We do not need another Presidential election where the Globalists own both horses in the race.

We need a real Constitutionalist to battle the Globalists.

Ron Paul 2012.

‘infiltrate’

Oooooh. Sounds a little paranoid to me.

Good ad.

It exposes Gingrich for the Globalist Liberal that he really is.

We do not need another Presidential election where the Globalists own both horses in the race.

We need a true Constitutionalist to run against the Globalists.

Ron Paul 2012.

“Personally, I’m really uncomfortable with some of Paul’s foreign policy beliefs.”

You make some good points.

As for foreign policy, having spent a good portion of the past decade in the Army and deploying into these theaters myself, I see Ron Paul as being absolutely correct in his assessments.

I guess that is why Ron Paul receives more campign contributions from military members than all other candidates combined! We military vets know the score over there.

Moreover, Ron Paul is a veteran himself who served honorably during the Viet Nam era. He is not a duplicitous chickenhawk like Gingrich and Romney who ‘opted-out’ during those times.

So, with Ron Paul there really is no worries on foreign policy.