Prayer PrayerRequest SCOTUS ProLife BangList Aliens HomosexualAgenda GlobalWarming Corruption Taxes Congress Fraud MediaBias GovtAbuse Tyranny Obama Biden Elections POLLS Debates TRUMP TalkRadio FreeperBookClub HTMLSandbox FReeperEd FReepathon CopyrightList Copyright/DMCA Notice Donate
Monthly Donors · Dollar-a-Day Donors · 300 Club Donors
How about Edsel? Pinto? 🤣🤣🤣
I would think that it would be any social media outlet claiming to have been pressured by the government into removing or suppressing something.
Don’t know what happened. Try this.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-tosses-claim-biden-administration-coerced-social-media-c-rcna151356
How would Trump’s NY convictions keep him off of the ballot in Missouri?
He was involved with Jane Fonda for a few years, his views apparently mirrored hers to some extent. They did a rather controversial documentary film involving the Vietnam War.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F.T.A.
Apparently he nearly died of spinal meningitis during the filming.
Under Virginia statute, if the difference is less than 1% either candidate can request a recount.
https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title24.2/chapter8/section24.2-800/
Read the article.
Read the story, he doesn’t sound like a liberal.
Most likely the third. Play stupid games...
Yes.
Not quite. Read the article.
Someone who can point to some tangible harm they’ve suffered as a result of the availability of these pills.
Are they supposed to lay out the whole story in the headline? It captures the gist of it.
Per the caption: “Supreme Court rejects bid to restrict access to abortion pill” Seems accurate to me.
Get Connected! Join Free Republic Today!
Already a Member? Log into your Free Republic account.