1 posted on
06/13/2024 7:17:26 AM PDT by
Coronal
To: Coronal
headline misleading- Supremes did not rule on the issue bt said the doctors did not have standing. likely to cme back as several states - with standing- will sue
2 posted on
06/13/2024 7:19:24 AM PDT by
avital2
("n)
To: Coronal
No legal standing. Issue not decided on the merits.
3 posted on
06/13/2024 7:24:32 AM PDT by
kabar
To: Coronal
The court found unanimously that
the group of anti-abortion doctors who questioned the Food and Drug Administration’s decisions making it easier to access the pill
did not have legal standing to sue. A technical ruling, not a ruling on the arguments in the suit itself.
5 posted on
06/13/2024 7:31:26 AM PDT by
Wuli
To: Coronal
7 posted on
06/13/2024 7:46:52 AM PDT by
Aeneas2112
(YOU are your own first responder)
To: Coronal
100% prolifer here but the reality lis that this just collapsed the rodents’ “Well win with abortion referendums.
9 posted on
06/13/2024 8:00:03 AM PDT by
jmaroneps37
(Freedom is never free. It must be won rewon and jealously guarded.)
To: Coronal
More correct headline would be: Supreme Court Rules Plantiffs in Abortion Pill Case Lack Standing.
To: Coronal
100% prolifer here but the reality lis that this just collapsed the rodents’ “Well win with abortion referendums.
11 posted on
06/13/2024 8:09:07 AM PDT by
jmaroneps37
(Freedom is never free. It must be won rewon and jealously guarded.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson