[Lazamataz]

Most every divorce case immediately starts with a restraining order, denying gun rights right out of the box.

This is a horrible decision.

[maro]

Going the other way on this issue would have been radical.

[Lazamataz]

....and so it begins.

[FLT-bird]

This is a bad ruling since DV restraining orders are practically automatically granted....so now a person’s constitutional rights can be infringed upon without conviction or a finding of mental incompetence by a doctor.

[thegagline]

"We must make sure that those judged to pose a grave risk to public safety do not have access to firearms, and that, if they do, those firearms can be taken through rapid due process," "That is why I have called for red flag laws, also known as extreme risk protection orders." Donald Trump

[dware]

I’m curious as to where it says, “...shall not be infringed, as long as you don’t have a protective order against you.”

[Gay State Conservative]

Unlike some (many?) Freepers I believe that there are *some* people whom shouldn't be allowed to have firearms. When you're *convicted* of certain crimes...certain *types* of crimes...you've shown yourself to be untrustworthy and unfit to have a gun.

[nwrep]

Only the extremist radical Thomas dissented.

[circlecity]

I disagree but saw it coming.