Free Republic

Oh, I was typing fast, you must have no idea what I meant. Have any of you reactionaries even bothered to watch the video and listen to what he was saying?

I’ve been on this site for what I consider a long time, and I’ve never been pounced on like this for what I consider a rather tame posting.

He didn’t just not get reelected, he suffered the worst loss of any incumbent Senator in history. He is a pure politician and shameless opportunist and the people of Pennsylvania recognized that.

You know, this site is becoming nothing more than groupthink. Rick Santorum is no different than Mitt Romney or Newt Gingrich.

Also, as someone who has a close friend whose child has Downs, I resent the term “Paultard”. It also makes you sound like a third grader tunting someone at recess.

Ron Paul brilliantly articulating the failed strageties of the past and contrasting the way we are currently dealing with our enemies as opposed to the much more powerful, nuclear armed ones of the past. Santorum was out of his league.

It appears that both Gingrich and Romney flap in the wind and say whatever they think will get them elected at the time. Ron Paul is the only candidate who is saying the same things now as he has been saying for decades. Like him or not, he is clearly the most consistent and apparently committed to his beliefs.

Do the founders of this website and the majority of people here actually support Newt Gingrich?

Has there been any polling of Freepers to determine whom the majority of members are backing? I’m curious to know.

Why is Ron Paul the leading candidate among active military?

Are they treasonous cowards as well?

All should take notice that Ron Paul was the first candidate with the guts to stand up to this fool and rightly ridicule his role as the host of a “presidential debate”

“Ross Perot gave the election to Clinton.The first step into the abyss....”

That statement is foolish. Ross Perot didn’t give the election to Clinton, George Bush gave the election to Clinton by not positioning himself as the best candidate.

If he had stood up for the same things as Ross Perot did, people like me would not have voted for Perot and would have supported Bush.

History is repeating itself, and again the problem is not Trump or Ron Paul, but rather the lack of a true alternative within the current crop of “Republicans”

“I don’t like Ron Paul on foreign policy either. But as far as I’m concerned, at this particular juncture in history, the US Federal Government poses a far bigger threat to the safety and security of this country than Iran.”

Worth repeating

Agreed 100%

Now only cowards oppose wasteful military excursions?

You don’t have to be a fan of endless war to be an “actual” conservative. Nice try though.

Sending our kids overseas to defend corporate interests is neither conservative or patriotic.

Didn’t you get the memo?

Ron Paul is a wild eyed, crazy old kook!

Don’t you know that you must choose one of the two establishment candidates or you are throwing your vote away?

Ron Paul is the only true conservative in this crowd of Dem-Lites.

The real story here is not the thievery but the amount of money being thrown at these “programs” with little or no oversight. This should be at minimum a state matter, but the federal lunch “program” has grown into a behemoth.

Who knew there was even this type of money available to be stolen in the first place?

This article illustrates the increasingly militant activist role that minority groups are taking against the duly elected representatives of the citizenry.

They have now mastered the art of using threats and lawsuits to demand and often get their way. The cry of racism is becoming an increasingly powerful tool for these people and their masters.

Essentially this accountant has mastered the art of tax avoidance. Not sure if he deserved scorn or praise, but it shows the folly of the US tax code.

$58 million

They could have given 116 existing small businesses that have been providing jobs and paying taxes $500,000 each to spend on improving their facilities, with the money to be spent locally and within 2 years. That would be economic stimulus and job creation.

This article is sickening. $700 a month payment for children who never learned to behave or pay attention. SSI was intended for parents of children with extreme conditions which severely impacted their families' lives, work, etc. Notice how the Globe isn't offering online comments for this article. I love how their editors pick and choose.