Free Republic

Some are wondering if those who broke in were Antifa posing as Trump supporters and were wearing Maga hats. I saw a tweet by someone that instructed Antifa to wear the Maga hats backwards so they can identify each other.

They’re here not asking congress to decide who won.

They’re asking for the congress to find out who won the legal vote.

You’re in Tokyo. Surely you’ve seen the groundswell of support with the large Trump rallies in Ginza and Osaka and other cities.

Trump really alienated the Japanese in 2016 by saying “The Chinese and Japanese are ‘stealing’ our jobs!” Stupid choice of words because that alone alienated a lot of Japanese who felt Trump was accusing them of being “thieves.” Trump screwed up then because he could have simply said “outcompeting us for jobs” - which is true.

HOWEVER, since then, Trump has taken on China and North Korea - Japan’s only two enemies. Japanese are now realizing how a loss of this election to Beijing Biden will be horrible for Japan’s security. Even SOME of the Japanese MSM who used to be so anti-Trump, are coming around to realize this.

Like you, I know Japanese culture very well.

Footnote: Do you really think donations to the Trump campaign go to fund Ivanka’s lifestyle and Don Jr’s Safaris? If so, you’re brainwashed. These people have enough money. Trump donates his $400K/year salary to charity.

Footnote #1: Don’t you care about election fraud and don’t you at least want a thorough vetting of the election?

Yes, I agree and have thought the same thing too.

It’s likely a fraction of fraud that is individual voters. It is election fraud. Somehow, as a chant, though, “Voter Fraud Matters” sounds better than “Election Fraud Matters.”

Yes, the bigtime fraud is committed by groups of thugs in the counting offices (e.g. scanning same Biden ballots multiple times) and rigged machines.

******* Voter Fraud Matters!! *******
******* Voter Fraud Matters!! *******
******* Voter Fraud Matters!! *******
******* Voter Fraud Matters!! *******
******* Voter Fraud Matters!! *******
******* Voter Fraud Matters!! *******
******* Voter Fraud Matters!! *******
******* Voter Fraud Matters!! *******
******* Voter Fraud Matters!! *******
******* Voter Fraud Matters!! *******
******* Voter Fraud Matters!! *******
******* Voter Fraud Matters!! *******

Imagine a MILLION Trump supporters in Wash D.C. chanting this slogan on Jan 6th SO LOUD that it can be heard in the Joint Session of Congress...

******* Voter Fraud Matters!! *******
******* Voter Fraud Matters!! *******
******* Voter Fraud Matters!! *******
******* Voter Fraud Matters!! *******
******* Voter Fraud Matters!! *******
******* Voter Fraud Matters!! *******
******* Voter Fraud Matters!! *******
******* Voter Fraud Matters!! *******
******* Voter Fraud Matters!! *******
******* Voter Fraud Matters!! *******
******* Voter Fraud Matters!! *******
******* Voter Fraud Matters!! *******

Imagine a MILLION Trump supporters in Wash D.C. chanting this slogan on Jan 6th SO LOUD that it can be heard in the Joint Session of Congress...

FAKE VOTES MATTER!!

Pass this slogan around, folks!

FAKE VOTES MATTER!!

Pass this slogan around folks.

—”Who is we?”

You and me.

Like you, I want a new America First Trump Party too. But there are not enough Trumpers in the House and Senate. Too many RINOs.

So if you and many others stubbornly say, I’ll never vote Republican again (e.g. GOP/RINO Repubs), many GOP House & Senate seats will be won by Democrats. Do you want that?

That’s why we need to transition into a Trump majority STRATEGICALLY. I understand your angst, but we can’t afford to be foolish and shoot ourselves in the foot by letting Dems take complete control.

Consider the “lesser of two evils” philosophy: if you think Dems are far more evil than GOP/RINOS (and they are), AND if there is no viable Trump Party candidate in a particular election, you vote for GOP/RINOS while grooming Trump Party candidates to take over the GOP/RINO seats in the next election.

In other words, I hate to break the news to you, but a transition to a Trump Party majority in House/Senate can’t happen overnight - unless of course, there is a key event that immediately shifts national sentiment.

I’m hoping this election fraud may be that kind of key event in which all RINOS capitulate.

I agree with most of what you say and I despise RINOS as much as the next guy, but one has to be realistic about what happens if you and others go “scorched-earth” on the RINOS.

If we do that, then the Democrats gain control and we never will get control back again. Is that what you want?

My theory is we have to “use” the RINOS to our advantage to smooth the transition to a full America First Party — because the alternative (Demorat socialism/communism) is much much worse.

Have you thought deeply about what would happen if we just dump support for the GOP/RINOS as you suggest? It’s not as simple as you think. In other words, we can’t magically turn RINOS and centrist Repubs into Trumpers overnight.

So the net effect is that of splitting the conservative vote — and then we never win anything again. What’s so hard to understand about this?

-—”Change my party affiliation from republican to independent, Im thru with them all”

A lot of good that will do.../sarc

Think deeper about this before you do so. Why?

Because 3rd party candidates split conservative votes and ensure that conservatives will never win. Think of Ross Perot’s candidacy: Were it not for Perot, Slick Willie Clinton probably wouldn’t have won.

During the transition away from the RINO party, a strategic calculation has to be made that factors in “Is it better to vote for the RINO than tossing your vote away to an independent candidate that won’t win anyway, so that the DemoRat candidate wins.”

Thus, we’d end up with a DemoRat candidate winning who is far worse than a RINO. Shooting yourself in the foot.

——”Require a proper I.D. for all voting. Everyone must already have a proper I.D. that allows them to cash their federal and state checks. No proper I.D., no vote! In Florida when handing in your absentee ballot to the supervisor of elections office, you must show proper I.D. and someone physically matches your signature to that on your I.D. Every other states must do this.”

Even MEXICO REQUIRES VOTER ID!! Japan does too. No ID, No vote.

The false DemoRat argument that Voter-ID “disenfranchises” some voters who are “unable” to get their own personal ID is clearly used because DemoRats WANT TO COMMIT VOTER FRAUD!

Repubs could very easily circumvent that fake “problem” by setting up an appeals process for people who don’t have ID’s who can prove in other ways who they are — and then they could be given a unique ID.

Brilliant comparison...

Impeach/Recall the Turtle NOW!

No wonder he’s been hit-or-miss in his support for Trump: Surely his Chinese wife doesn’t like to “lose face” every time Trump correctly refers to China as a dishonest & greedy country.

I never understood why such a seemingly incompetent fossil could be Senate Majority leader for so many years. What about some of the talented younger senators?

https://www.scribd.com/document/488107901/Antrim-Michigan-Forensics-Report-121320-v2-REDACTED

Here is the full Michigan forensics report on the Dominion machines. If you read it, it’s becomes clear why MI Sec of State Joceyln Benson wanted a gag order on it...

The report states in several places that SHE LIED.

And that’s why she’s doesn’t want to be interrogated in a hearing!!

In addition, the author writes about the risk of getting Bell’s Palsy (facial neuralgia problems), but if he read more about the subject, the vaccines had (4) cases of Bell’s Palsy out of 30,000 in the test group.

That’s statistically insignificant, but makes a sensational headline.

This is probably the key filing from PA:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163367/20201210142206254_Pennsylvania%20Opp%20to%20Bill%20of%20Complaint%20v.FINAL.pdf

They say, among other things, Texas has no standing, etc..

IV.Texas is Not Entitled to the Extraordinary
Preliminary Injunction it Seeks
............................
27A. Texas cannot meet the high standard for
injunctive relief
................................
.................
27B. Texas’s request to disenfranchise tens of
millions of voters who reasonably relied upon
the law at the time of the election does great damage to the public interest
..........................
___________________________________________

PA makes no mention or concern about disenfranchising millions of Republican voters via illegal changes to voting procedures...

Any other opinions of people here who have a legal background?

Thanks for the interesting counterpoint.

I hadn’t heard that before, but it’s plausible SCOTUS addressed this before. Maybe that applies to an individual plaintiff, but not a class of plaintiffs - because surely, the case I cited below illustrates that a mere 2 vote swing can change an election and disenfranchise one side or the other.

Sure, understood. The point in my analysis still stands, whether it involved voiding as unconstitutional the mail-in ballots or whether it involved fraud.

In both cases, the legal votes & constitutionally-legitimate votes are disenfranchised if a judge fails to throw out those ballots.

Let’s hope the judge is better than in other courts so far... Several judges have justified their rejections of Trump/Powell/Wood suits based disenfranchising the Biden votes.

But there is something mathematically wrong when judges like Timothy Batten in Georgia essentially claim that decertifying would be “disenfranchising the 2.5M voters who voted for Biden...”

If there was ANY voter fraud that tipped the scales for Biden, the judge is DISENFRANCHISING the several million voters who voted FOR Trump if he ignores the fraud!!

For example, suppose:

1. There were 2,500,000 “votes” for Biden
2. There were 2,499,999 votes for Trump.
3. Biden is declared the winner by the DemMedia
4. Later, it was proven that TWO (2) “dead” people voted for Biden, so they are properly tossed out.

Now, with a corrected election tally, Trump wins:

1. 2,499,999 votes for Trump.
2. 2,499,998 votes for Biden.

The point is that even if only a FEW fraudulent votes are found, those few votes have the effect of disenfranchising MILLIONS of legal voters in relatively close elections.

The judge is looking at this backwards: He is incorrectly discriminating on behalf of the 2.5 million Biden votes by choosing to not rectify the fraudulent votes within.