Let’s hope the judge is better than in other courts so far... Several judges have justified their rejections of Trump/Powell/Wood suits based disenfranchising the Biden votes.
But there is something mathematically wrong when judges like Timothy Batten in Georgia essentially claim that decertifying would be “disenfranchising the 2.5M voters who voted for Biden...”
If there was ANY voter fraud that tipped the scales for Biden, the judge is DISENFRANCHISING the several million voters who voted FOR Trump if he ignores the fraud!!
For example, suppose:
1. There were 2,500,000 “votes” for Biden
2. There were 2,499,999 votes for Trump.
3. Biden is declared the winner by the DemMedia
4. Later, it was proven that TWO (2) “dead” people voted for Biden, so they are properly tossed out.
Now, with a corrected election tally, Trump wins:
1. 2,499,999 votes for Trump.
2. 2,499,998 votes for Biden.
The point is that even if only a FEW fraudulent votes are found, those few votes have the effect of disenfranchising MILLIONS of legal voters in relatively close elections.
The judge is looking at this backwards: He is incorrectly discriminating on behalf of the 2.5 million Biden votes by choosing to not rectify the fraudulent votes within.
That particular PA lawsuit was not alleging fraud. It was stating (truthfully) that PA legislature overhauled its mail-in voting procedure. Before 2019, PA allowed absentee voting but only in four narrow circumstances.
Subsequently, PA loosened things up by allowing universal mail-in votes. About 2-3 million people took advantage of this.
The lawsuit does not allege that any of these votes were fraudulent. It alleges that the universal mail-in vote law violated PA Constitution, and therefore void. Consequently, all those votes should be disallowed.