Posted on 05/11/2024 3:39:39 PM PDT by Roman_War_Criminal
The world is just a few weeks away from the global acceptance of the World Health Organization pandemic treaty, known as WHO. This treaty includes the “One Health” agenda and is designed to “balance” the health of people, animals, and plants, as though all three are of equal value.
One Health Adopting the “One Health” approach will affect multiple aspects of everyday life, from agriculture and farming to livestock and food production to environmental issues. The “One Health” agenda is designed to globally declare possible pandemic-type risks, which will naturally lead to forced lockdowns and restrictions placed upon the private sector. The solution will be more mass vaccinations and, for the safety of the general public, more types of surveillance on private citizens.
In 2018, the National One Health Steering Committee (NOHSC) and Technical Working Groups (TWG) agreed to a five-year strategic plan. Part of that strategic plan is the Global Health Security Agenda. What is that? The Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA) is a global effort to strengthen the world’s ability to prevent, detect, and respond to infectious disease threats. More than 70 countries, including the United States, have signed onto the GHSA framework.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which works directly with other governments, plays a leading role in supporting progress towards the GHSA’s targeted goals for 2024.
(Excerpt) Read more at harbingersdaily.com ...
End Times Ping
FReemail me please if you wish to be added to or removed from The End Times Ping List.
Maranatha!
The globalist psychopaths want us dead.
We should make them dead first.
Has this “treaty” been ratified by the US Senate?
If not, why are we discussing it?
“One Health” agenda and is designed to “balance” the health of people, animals, and plants, as though all three are of equal value
What a load of crap
and will be another total disaster and waste of money and lives
What is this “Euthanasia Clause” I see in the treaty? “Sacrifices have to be made for the betterment of mankind”. Who determines this?
It will not be ratified by this Congress, but Sloe Joe and The Hoe’s administration will declare it law of the land, despite the US Constitution and US laws prohibiting it FRom being implemented.
They will ignore the Constitution and Law and proceed.
POTUS 47, Donald J. Trump will, on January 20, 2025, among other immediate actions, declare it null and void!
What is this “Euthanasia Clause” I see in the treaty? “Sacrifices have to be made for the betterment of mankind”. Who determines this?
Euthanasia Clause for parts of the world that are very poor and will never be anything but a drain on the world or will they go for the West ,LOL
Agreed. If a foreign power tries to institute a lockdown, you summarily execute the enforcers.
and it’s easy to tell who’s going to pay from this WHO crap
LOL
you write as though we still have the rule of law
like the Georgia Guidestones said, "reduce population to 500,000,000"
so I reckon a few billion of us need to be taken out
G W MORON and Romney approve
I guess they’re beginning to realize it’s easier to scare people into compliance when something appears to pose a direct threat to their physical person, than something vague and undefined as climate change.
Genocide by guile.
It looks like too many people have forgotten the devastation that pandemics and epidemics have wreaked in the past.
Having a coordinated international response to outbreaks is our best defense against pandemics. An outbreak that is stopped early never gets the chance to grow into a pandemic. Historically, pandemics have killed tens of millions of people. A third of the population of Europe died off during the Plague. Throughout history, infectious diseases have always been the largest killer.
I suspect that those who are inventing and spreading these nefarious conspiracy theories have much the same goals as those who originally started antivax propaganda back in the early 1800s. They want more people to die from infectious diseases. In the 1800s, the antivaxxers believed that stopping people from dying young from infectious disease went against the will of God. Today, they believe that dying early helps to relieve overpopulation. Whatever the motive, the goal is the same: to kill off people.
What a suicide shot shill death vax propagandist you are!
Maybe you still are a “DEM”?
Your type rules by intimidation, manipulation, and domination.
I'm a "suicide shot shill death vax propagandist" because Republicans are being targeted specifically with antivax lies and, as a result, Republicans continue to die from Covid at a higher rate than Democrats or independents.
I try to educate people about the science of vaccination in order to "inoculate" them against lying antivax propaganda.
There is no reason that Republicans should have to die more than Democrats. Unless you're a liberal who is cheering the higher death rate of Republicans, in which case you're looking forward to all elections finally being won by socialists because the opposition died off.
Source for your contention of a political affiliation die-off?
Sounds like bull squeeze to me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.