Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Three Things You're Probably Getting Wrong about Praying to the Saints
Shameless popery ^ | April 20, 2015

Posted on 04/20/2015 1:46:59 PM PDT by NYer

As Christianity Today acknowledges, prayers for and to the Saints date back to the early Church (in fact, these practices date back far earlier, even to Old Testament Judaism, but I'll talk more about that tomorrow). Nevertheless, these practices are controversial within Protestantism. Today, I want to look at just one of them -- prayer to the Saints -- and show why the opposition to it is grounded in a faulty view of life after death. Tomorrow, I'll look at the Biblical support for both prayer to the Saints and prayer for the Saints.

First, a word on why Protestants tend to object to prayer to the Saints. For some people, such prayers are sinful, since they think it gives glory to someone other than God, or that it's equivalent to “consulting the dead.” Others view it simply as impossible, since they think that the Saints can't hear us, or are unconcerned with what's going on here below. But almost all of these arguments are built upon the same three misconceptions about the souls of the Saints who have gone before us. Given this, let's present the Biblical view on each of these three major points:

Johann Michael Rottmayr, Intercession of Charles Borromeo supported by the Virgin Mary (1714)
1. The Saints in Heaven are Alive, not Dead.

The first mistake in opposing “prayers to the dead” is assuming that we're praying to “the dead.” One of the most frequently cited passages against prayer to the Saints in Heaven is Isaiah 8:19,
And when they say to you, “Consult the mediums and the wizards who chirp and mutter,” should not a people consult their God? Should they consult the dead on behalf of the living?
Those who oppose prayer to the Saints present a straightforward argument: the faithful departed are dead, and it's sinful to “consult the dead.”

But the first premise -- that the faithful departed are dead -- is false, and directly contrary to Scripture. Jesus actually denounces this view as Biblically ignorant (Mk. 12:24). He reveals the truth about the Saints when He says, “I am the resurrection and the life; he who believes in me, though he die, yet shall he live, and whoever lives and believes in me shall never die” (John 11:25-26). And in response to the Sadduccees, He says (Mark 12:26-27):
And as for the dead being raised, have you not read in the book of Moses, in the passage about the bush, how God said to him, “I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob? He is not the God of the dead, but of the living; you are quite wrong.
So the Protestant view that says that Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob are “dead” is “quite wrong.”

Read the literature written against prayers to the Saints, and see how frequently they're mischaracterized as “the dead.” This isn't a harmless mistake. The passages warning against “the dead” simply don't apply to the question of the Saints. Indeed, a great many popular assumptions about the afterlife are built on the idea that verses like Psalm 115:17 (“The dead do not praise the LORD, nor do any that go down into the silence”) apply to the Saints in Heaven. They don't, and Christ tells us that they don't.

The Ladder of Divine Ascent (12th c. icon)
2. The Saints in Heaven are Witnesses, not Sleeping or Ignorant.

Related to the first mistake is the idea that the departed Saints are cut off from us on Earth, and that it's therefore immoral (or at least futile) to communicate with them. This belief takes two general forms: first that the souls of the just are “asleep” until the Resurrection; second, that the souls are isolated in Heaven.

First, soul sleep. The United Church of God argues against praying to “dead” saints:
In addition to all this, praying to dead saints today assumes the doctrine of the immortal soul, which many people are surprised to find is not taught in the Bible. The Bible teaches that death is like sleep that lasts until the resurrection at Jesus Christ's second coming (1 Thessalonians:4:13-16 ).
Now, United Church of God aren't mainstream Protestants by any stretch: they are Sabbatarians (meaning that they reject Sunday worship) and they reject the Trinity. But this notion of soul sleep can be traced to Martin Luther, who wrote:
For the Christian sleeps in death and in that way enters into life, but the godless departs from life and experiences death forever [...] Hence death is also called in the Scriptures a sleep. For just as he who falls asleep does not know how it happens, and he greets the morning when he awakes, so shall we suddenly arise on the last day, and never know how we entered and passed through death.
Even Luther's most militant supporters concede that he held some sort of confused and often-contradictory notion of “soul sleep.” So, too, did many of the Radical Reformers. In this view, the souls of the Saints aren't “conscious,” and so it would be futile to ask them for prayers.

The second camp rejects soul sleep, but thinks that the souls in Heaven are isolated from us. For example, the website “Just for Catholics” acknowledges that the first half of the Hail Mary comes directly from Scripture, but says that these Scriptures aren't permitted to be used as prayer:
Even though the first two sentences are taken from the Bible, it does not mean that it is right to use them as a prayer. Mary could hear the salutations of the Gabriel and Elizabeth because they spoke in her immediate presence. Now Mary is dead and her soul is in heaven. She cannot hear the prayers of thousands and thousands who constantly call upon her name. Only the all-knowing God can hear the prayers of His people.
But Scripture doesn't present the Saints in Heaven as isolated or spiritually asleep. Rather, even in their “rest,” they're presented as alert and aware of the goings-on of Earth (Revelation 6:9-11):
I saw under the altar the souls of those who had been slain for the word of God and for the witness they had borne; they cried out with a loud voice, “O Sovereign Lord, holy and true, how long before thou wilt judge and avenge our blood on those who dwell upon the earth?” Then they were each given a white robe and told to rest a little longer, until the number of their fellow servants and their brethren should be complete, who were to be killed as they themselves had been.
Perhaps the clearest description of the relationship between the Saints in Heaven and the saints on Earth is in the Book of Hebrews. Chapter 11 is a litany of Saints who lived by faith, leading immediately into this (Heb. 12:1-2):
Therefore, since we are surrounded by so great a cloud of witnesses, let us also lay aside every weight, and sin which clings so closely, and let us run with perseverance the race that is set before us, looking to Jesus the pioneer and perfecter of our faith, who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and is seated at the right hand of the throne of God.
The spiritual life is compared to competing in a race, an image that Paul uses elsewhere (1 Corinthians 9:24-27; 2 Timothy 4:6-7). Here, the imagery is fleshed out to show that the Saints in Heaven are a great crowd of witnesses in the stands. Obviously, this idea of the heavenly Saints as “a crowd of witnesses” is incompatible with the idea that they're either asleep or unavailable to see us.

Matthias Gerung, John's Vision, from the Ottheinrich Bible (1531)
3. The Saints in Heaven are Still Part of the Church.

The Biblical depiction of the Saints as the heavenly witnesses in the grandstands of our spiritual race rebuts a third view: namely, that the Saints are enjoying God's company so much that they've stopped caring about us. For example, a Christian Post column on the subject seems to suggest that the Saints don't do anything for us once they're in Heaven:
So yes, they are not really dead. But that doesn't mean they hear our prayers, or provide even the slightest bit of assistance in answer to our prayers, regardless of how noble their lives may have been while on earth. God doesn't use saints in heaven to bless saints on earth. Instead, God utilizes His holy angels to minister to His children on earth. 
Such a view gets things entirely backwards. Rather, their holiness and their enjoyment of God means that they love us and care for us all the more. That's why they're witnesses to our spiritual race; that's why the martyrs in Heaven are still concerned with justice on Earth. The more we love God, the more we love our neighbor. And the Saints love God with a perfection impossible to us here below.

One way to think about this is to remember the shocking fact that the Saints are still part of the Church. The Bible describeds the Church as both the Body of Christ and the Bride of Christ. For example, St. Paul tells us that the Church is the Body of Christ (Colossians 1:18, 24), and the Body of Christ is the Church (Ephesians 5:23). The Saints aren't somehow cut off from Christ in Heaven, which is why we see the Holy Spirit presenting the Bride of Christ in Heaven (Revelation 21:9, 22:17). That membership in the Church helps to explain their heavenly intercession (1 Corinthians 12:24-26):
But God has so composed the body, giving the greater honor to the inferior part, that there may be no discord in the body, but that the members may have the same care for one another. If one member of suffers, all suffer together; if one member is honored, all rejoice together.
So both perfect Christian charity and our union in the Body of Christ help to account for why the Saints intercede for us. 

Conclusion

Scripture repeatedly calls for us to pray for one another (e.g., 1 Thessalonians 5:25; 2 Thes. 3:1; Colossians 4:3; Hebrews 13:18), to make “supplications for all the saints” (Ephesians 6:18), and for “supplications, prayers, intercessions, and thanksgivings” to be made “for all men” (1 Timothy 2:1). Neither in praying for one another nor in asking one another for prayers do we risk offending God in the slightest. Quite the contrary: “This is good, and it is acceptable in the sight of God our Savior, who desires all men to be saved and to come to knowledge of the truth” (1 Tim. 2:3-4).

The Catholic position simply applies these Scriptural teaching to the entire Body of Christ, while the standard Protestant position says that these teachings don't apply to the parts of the Church that are already in Heaven. The view goes awry in calling for us to ignore an entire portion of the Body of Christ: urging us not to pray for the faithful departed, and not to ask the Saints in glory to pray for us. Scripture calls for us to “have the same care for one another,” to suffer and triumph with the other parts of the Body. The Saints' glory is ours; our struggles are theirs. 

As you can see from the above post, many of the most popular arguments against praying to the Saints are based on false ideas about what happens to the souls of the just after death: thinking that the Saints are dead, or asleep, or isolated, or apathetic, or outside the Church. In fact, they're alive and before God, yet still connected to us, witnessing our triumphs, failures and struggles, all the while rooting for us and praying for us. 

With a correct view of the state of the glorified Saints and their role in the Church, most of the arguments against seeking their intercession simply dissolve. There's simply no good reason to cut the heavenly Saints off from the rest of the Body. You're surrounded by Heavenly witnesses who are supporting you in your spiritual race. What's more, they're your brothers and sisters in Christ. Given this, by all means, ask for their spiritual help and encouragement!


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Charismatic Christian; Evangelical Christian; Mainline Protestant; Other Christian; Prayer
KEYWORDS: prayer; prayerstosaints; praying; saints; venoration
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600601-620621-640 ... 981-984 next last
To: Elsie; EagleOne
It's gonna go something like this: the wafer becomes the literal body of Christ.. and Christ came from Mary. ...ergo...

I can see that happening in the near future. I really can..

601 posted on 04/21/2015 7:03:29 PM PDT by smvoice (There are no prizes given for defending the indefensible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 594 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
Consider the impact of this kind of contempt: does it really advance the kind of mutual respect we want to have?


602 posted on 04/21/2015 7:04:08 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 574 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
That is an ignorant question coming from all except those who don't know or believe the scriptures...It has been scripturally answered on these forums for years... You keep asking the same question apparently hoping you will get a different answer that will agree with your unbiblical theory...

False

603 posted on 04/21/2015 7:04:16 PM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 525 | View Replies]

To: metmom
"The actions of Catholics..."

Again, it is an irrational and vacuous position. Refuting the Catholic teaching because of the actions of a few Catholics acting outside of her teaching makes as much sense as judging a medicine by its affects on those who don't take it.

604 posted on 04/21/2015 7:04:59 PM PDT by Eucharista
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 528 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
They in no way had authority to rule on whether what Paul taught about the Messiah was true or not. It was all true because Paul had that authority, not the Bereans.

Unlike Catholics they knew they could check the scripture to see if Paul was telling the truth???

Authority??? What authority??? That's a false concept of Catholicism...We don't need authority to read and understand the scriptures...

That's another area where you guys fail...They've convinced you (and you try to convince others) that their phoney interpretation of scripture (in spite of what scripture clearly say) is the result of some perceived authority...

Eph 3:4 Whereby, when ye read, ye may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ)

Do you understand that verse...How has your religion perverted that verse to make you think you can't understand what Paul wrote???

605 posted on 04/21/2015 7:05:15 PM PDT by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 500 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981

Read #560...


606 posted on 04/21/2015 7:07:16 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 603 | View Replies]

To: Eucharista
makes as much sense as judging a medicine by its affects on those who don't take it.

Like those in trial studies who are given placebos?

("effects" is correct.)
607 posted on 04/21/2015 7:07:54 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 604 | View Replies]

To: NYer

.
If you’re praying to “the saints” you’re getting everything wrong.

First, it isn’t even remotely likely that any of them really are saints, and second, you have no permission from Yehova to pray to any dead human.

Like the idea of a permanent vacation to a very warm beach? Then pray on!
.


608 posted on 04/21/2015 7:08:22 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smvoice
I’m sorry, did I say the Bereans had any authority? No I did not. I said that they searched the scriptures daily to see if the things that were said authoritatively were in fact scriptural. Which is exactly what we are called to do. That way we don’t end up believing nonsense spewed from fallible men who are somehow believed to possess truth from outside God’s Word.

You seem to be writing that the Bereans were capable of judging whether the things that were said authoritatively were in fact scriptural. The things that were said authoritatively were in fact scriptural, because the Apostle Paul was a chosen vessel of the LORD Jesus Christ and it was the Apostle Paul saying them. Searching the scriptures only helped the Bereans to believe him; it did not grant them any help in separating truth from error. There was no error. Concerning the Bereans, it was all about the evangelism of them by an apostle.

609 posted on 04/21/2015 7:08:56 PM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 505 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o; Iscool; ealgeone
the views presented about Marian devotion in this forum have resulted in a distorted picture of the Church, much like the elephant as perceived by the six blind men...

An analogy: I once read with great interest a short book called "The Trail of Blood"

Your analogy is faulty if the issue is what RCs teach, which is what the poster responded to ("Nobody thinks that the saints...."), and what he cited does not present a false description about Marian devotion, nor a distorted picture of the Church since she allows such to abound, and which even comes from popes, as overall they are not seen to contradict official statements.

when comparing doctrines, the first thing you want to determine is whether the proposition or text you are discussing is actually a doctrine.

But when responding to statements, the first thing you want to determine is what the text you are discussing is actually referring to, which in thus case was in regard to the "Nobody thinks" how saints in heaven act, not what is officially taught. Which itself is subject to interpretation by RCs.

my advice would be to stick with authoritative summaries of doctrine, e.g. the Catechism. Or to ask a knowledgeable Catholic, "What do you mean by this?" with the expectation of a good-faith explanation.

CCC statements was not the issue, but what knowledgeable Catholics say about Mary. Changing the subject will not change that.

610 posted on 04/21/2015 7:10:05 PM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981; Iscool
When does your religious community believe Revelation was written ?

Scholarship work suggests between 91-96 AD.

611 posted on 04/21/2015 7:12:06 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 599 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
The things that were said authoritatively were in fact scriptural, because the Apostle Paul was a chosen vessel of the LORD Jesus Christ and it was the Apostle Paul saying them.

Then why don't Roman Catholics LISTEN and HEED Paul?

(Well, the Holy Spirit promptings through Paul.)

Why does the RCC downplay Paul's writings, even explain some of them away, while lifting up Peter and James?
612 posted on 04/21/2015 7:13:38 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 609 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
"Even Esau...""Love" and "hate" are very poor translations of the underlying Hebrew words. "Love" is not an infatuation as we know it, but has more to do with recognizing the status of ones particular covenantal relationship with God and acting in loyal accord with the requirements of that relationship. Esau disdained his relationship and sold it for a bowl of soup. Similarly, "Hate" is the opposite--stating the lack of such a covenantal relationship. Jacob and his family maintained a covenantal relationship with Israel's God, Yahweh. Esau and his family do not have this relationship.
613 posted on 04/21/2015 7:16:01 PM PDT by Eucharista
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 552 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
""This is my body..."

The body of Christ is not a work.

614 posted on 04/21/2015 7:16:01 PM PDT by Eucharista
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 590 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

LOL!

Joseph should have written to Miss Manners.

The question is how did James, Jude, Simon and Andy get here?

Was she steppin’ out?

We know by the Bible that they were Mary’s kids, but where does it say they were Joseph’s?
.


615 posted on 04/21/2015 7:18:16 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 558 | View Replies]

To: Eucharista
"Love" and "hate" are very poor translations of the underlying Hebrew words. "Love" is not an infatuation as we know it, but has more to do with recognizing the status of ones particular covenantal relationship with God and acting in loyal accord with the requirements of that relationship. Esau disdained his relationship and sold it for a bowl of soup. Similarly, "Hate" is the opposite--stating the lack of such a covenantal relationship. Jacob and his family maintained a covenantal relationship with Israel's God, Yahweh. Esau and his family do not have this relationship.

True, but that is not the only way love and hate are referenced in the Hebrew. You paint a colorless outline of a very rich subject.
616 posted on 04/21/2015 7:19:04 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 613 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero; af_vet_1981; Iscool

That’s always been my question: why downplay Paul’s writings and his Christ-given role as Apostle to the Gentiles? Especially after studying Gal.2:2,9? It would seem the RCC would have a better shot claiming Paul as their first pope rather than Peter, who, along with the 11, agreed to confine their work to Israel while Paul went to the Gentiles.


617 posted on 04/21/2015 7:20:38 PM PDT by smvoice (There are no prizes given for defending the indefensible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 612 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981; Iscool

.
The testimony of Polycarp is that Revelation was given to John in 91 AD.
.


618 posted on 04/21/2015 7:22:12 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 599 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
We know by the Bible that they were Mary’s kids, but where does it say they were Joseph’s?

That's the SECOND question I have ready for Mary when I see her.

(She's not answering my calls at present.)
619 posted on 04/21/2015 7:22:34 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 615 | View Replies]

To: smvoice
It would seem the RCC would have a better shot claiming Paul as their first pope rather than Peter, who, along with the 11, agreed to confine their work to Israel while Paul went to the Gentiles.

We are completely in agreement on this, Chief Free Small Voice.

R2z
620 posted on 04/21/2015 7:25:20 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 617 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600601-620621-640 ... 981-984 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson