Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
All’s I gotta say is farm-animals(dot)com
2 posted on
06/22/2014 1:01:36 PM PDT by
VRW Conspirator
(Global Warming is caused by illegal immigrants!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Polygamy
Pedophilia
Bestiality
The order does not matter. All will be pushed as part of the agenda. The Left will take whatever it can get. But the Left is relentless and expects to get all three, given enough time.
3 posted on
06/22/2014 1:03:48 PM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
("Harvey Dent, can we trust him?" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBsdV--kLoQ)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
And after polygamy, comes paganism, and after paganism - human sacrifice beyond abortion and euthanasia.
4 posted on
06/22/2014 1:04:32 PM PDT by
sr4402
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Big deal— Abraham, Jacob, David, Solomon, and others all had multiple wives....
5 posted on
06/22/2014 1:07:19 PM PDT by
freebilly
(How about this-- we stop trying to elect the unelectable)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Somehow, I don’t see pedophilia becoming mainstream. Unlike homosexual marriage, there aren’t any groups openly calling for it to become legal, there aren’t “pedophilia pride” parades, no politicians are running on it, and it’s apparently so disgusting that even prisoners in jail can’t stand such people. As perverted and stupid as society has become, I just can’t see it stooping even to that low level.
Now, incest between two adults, bestiality, polygamy...those are another story.
7 posted on
06/22/2014 1:08:47 PM PDT by
RWB Patriot
("My ability is a value that must be earned and I don't recognize anyone's need as a claim on me.")
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Of course it will! Even an blind man could see THAT coming!
12 posted on
06/22/2014 1:12:10 PM PDT by
SuziQ
To: 2ndDivisionVet
What could go wrong?
Warren Steed Jeffs (born December 3, 1955) is the president of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (FLDS Church). In 2011, Jeffs was convicted of two felony counts of child sexual assault.
Jeffs gained international notoriety in May 2006 when he was placed on the FBI's Ten Most Wanted List for unlawful flight to avoid prosecution on Utah state charges related to his alleged arrangement of illegal marriages between his adult male followers and underage girls. He was arrested in August 2006 in Nevada, and agreed to be taken to Utah for trial. In May and July 2007 the State of Arizona charged him with eight additional counts, including sexual conduct with minors and incest, in two separate cases.
His Utah trial, which began in early September 2007 in St. George, Utah, lasted less than a month, and on September 25 he was convicted of two counts of rape as an accomplice.
On November 20, 2007, he was sentenced to imprisonment for 10 years to life and began serving his sentence at the Utah State Prison. However, the conviction was overturned by the Utah Supreme Court on July 27, 2010, because of incorrect jury instructions.
He was extradited to Texas, where he was found guilty of sexual assault and aggravated sexual assault of children in connection with a raid of an FLDS owned and occupied West Texas ranch in 2008. After the jury had deliberated for less than 30 minutes, 55-year-old Jeffs was sentenced to life in prison plus 20 years, to be served consecutively, and a $10,000 fine for sexual assault of both 12- and 15-year-old girls.
15 posted on
06/22/2014 1:23:46 PM PDT by
Dallas59
("Remember me as you pass by, As you are now, so once was I, As I am now, so you will be")
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Polygamy has at least been an accepted form of marriage in many lands for thousands of years. It is arguably far less perverse than homosexuals pretending to marry. It is bizarre that our nation wants homosexuals to pretend they are married, but won’t allow polygamy. I’ve always wondered how American law treats the wives of those married in nations where polygamy is legal.
No, I don’t want polygamy legal either. But if I had to choose between legalizing it or homosexuals, I would come down on the side of King David instead of Sodom...
17 posted on
06/22/2014 1:33:41 PM PDT by
Mr Rogers
(Left wing. Right wing. One buzzard.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The courts rationale for homosexual marriage is very simple, if people love each other the state should not keep them from marrying. There is no rational basis from which to not apply the same rationale to polygamy. It, like homosexual marriage, is a done deal and if you don’t bake them three wedding cakes it is off to the re-education camps for you.
19 posted on
06/22/2014 1:36:40 PM PDT by
jwalsh07
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I think the pedophiles will be next because most folks cannot afford more than one wife. In fact, most men, myself included, cannot afford even one wife if she really likes to shop.
21 posted on
06/22/2014 1:40:07 PM PDT by
RoosterRedux
(Obama: Race is his cover...jihad is his game.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Still confused about it in the Bible...There was Adam and Eve...and not Adam and Eve, Steve, Cindy, Nancy, Ethel, Fiona, Susie, Ann and Fido.
24 posted on
06/22/2014 1:43:58 PM PDT by
Dallas59
("Remember me as you pass by, As you are now, so once was I, As I am now, so you will be")
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Incest....with Gay marry there is no procreation reason to block incestuous marry so if you follow the legal logic..incest will have to be allowed...
Truth is I view Gay as a super-set (a form) of Incest
Funny, one gay dream is of science giving them a way to generically procreate..
If there is ever is a way to artificially create a child from the genetic material from two males or two females
I fear the genetic problems will be far worst then what you see in “traditional” inbreeding
25 posted on
06/22/2014 1:44:08 PM PDT by
tophat9000
(An Eye for an Eye, a Word for a Word...nothing more)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Legally, given the decisions on homosexual marriage, I don’t see why it wouldn’t. I think both the bigamy and consanguinity laws are on borrowed time right now, and in that order, because there’s less “ick” factor to multiple marriages than incestuous ones. But make no mistake, they’re going to happen. (I think it’s going to create moral, legal and practical chaos, don’t get me wrong, but the legal and judicial professions aren’t paying a whole lot of attention to what I think.)
28 posted on
06/22/2014 1:50:11 PM PDT by
RichInOC
("ARMAGEDDON!!!")
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Not if the necrophiliacs and pederasts get there first.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Polygamy doesn't violate the Natural Law. Else, God never would have tolerated it, and in the case of Leverite Marriage, actually require it.
Aquinas and St. Augustine, as I recall, agreed with that, but they also saw that polygamy works against the "two-shall-become-one" paradigm that Jesus set down, so they didn't allow it.
But to say it's anywhere near as perverse as two guys having at it, then that's just silly.
The ancient Israelis had a very different attitude about sex than we have. Remember the story of the old King David and Abishag the Shunamite. Looking at beautiful naked girls was believed to have strong medicinal benefits!
Hey, if it's good enough for King David, it's good enough for me.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Marriage=One Man and One Woman 'Til Death Do Us Part
37 posted on
06/22/2014 2:20:32 PM PDT by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Leftists don't have boundries. Boundries and rules only applies to us...
41 posted on
06/22/2014 2:49:20 PM PDT by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Probably should have been first, makes more sense than...
48 posted on
06/22/2014 4:17:37 PM PDT by
ThePatriotsFlag
("There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide." - Thomas Jefferson)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Excellent graphic.
And we’re seeing the same shifts in the APA diagnostic manual. Thinking your gender is different than your anatomy isn’t a mental illness unless you are upset about it or suicidal. Sexual attraction to children isn’t harshly condemned any more, even as they push to make sexual education to younger and younger ages mandatory. Polygamy is more acceptable, especially two gay couples raising children together and “open marriages” that destroy the meaning of marriage.
51 posted on
06/22/2014 4:30:08 PM PDT by
tbw2
To: 2ndDivisionVet
As I have been saying for a while:
If there is nothing "special" about marriage being between one man and one woman; then, what is so special about the number 2?
Once you re-define something, it is open to being re-defined over and over again. The Left always denies the slippery slope; but, a slippery slope is inevitable. Once one group gets to redefine an institution for their agenda, you simply cannot keep out other re-definitions.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson