Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet
As I have been saying for a while:

If there is nothing "special" about marriage being between one man and one woman; then, what is so special about the number 2?

Once you re-define something, it is open to being re-defined over and over again. The Left always denies the slippery slope; but, a slippery slope is inevitable. Once one group gets to redefine an institution for their agenda, you simply cannot keep out other re-definitions.

55 posted on 06/22/2014 5:26:31 PM PDT by LibertarianLiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: LibertarianLiz

Yes, and in each case these plural “wives” brought them grief and harmed the Kingdom of Israel and the world. Also, by the time the Lord Jesus was on earth, plural marriage was no longer recognized. It actually was never “sanctioned” by God at all....more or less tolerated at best.


It might have been much worse if not for plural marriage, maybe there would have been no nation of Israel, and if no nation of Israel then no Messiah and no forgiveness for our sins.

God works in strange ways, thank god for Israel.


70 posted on 06/22/2014 11:33:05 PM PDT by ravenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson