Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Dinosaur Species Found in India
AP ^ | August 13, 2003 | RAMOLA TALWAR BADAM

Posted on 08/13/2003 9:02:05 PM PDT by nwrep

New Dinosaur Species Found in India
2 hours, 55 minutes ago
Add Top Stories - AP to My Yahoo!

By RAMOLA TALWAR BADAM, Associated Press Writer

BOMBAY, India - U.S. and Indian scientists said Wednesday they have discovered a new carnivorous dinosaur species in India after finding bones in the western part of the country.

Photo
AP Photo


Missed Tech Tuesday?
Check out the powerful new PDA crop, plus the best buys for any budget


The new dinosaur species was named Rajasaurus narmadensis, or "Regal reptile from the Narmada," after the Narmada River region where the bones were found.

The dinosaurs were between 25-30 feet long, had a horn above their skulls, were relatively heavy and walked on two legs, scientists said. They preyed on long-necked herbivorous dinosaurs on the Indian subcontinent during the Cretaceous Period at the end of the dinosaur age, 65 million years ago.

"It's fabulous to be able to see this dinosaur which lived as the age of dinosaurs came to a close," said Paul Sereno, a paleontologist at the University of Chicago. "It was a significant predator that was related to species on continental Africa, Madagascar and South America."

Working with Indian scientists, Sereno and paleontologist Jeff Wilson of the University of Michigan reconstructed the dinosaur skull in a project funded partly by the National Geographic (news - web sites) Society.

A model of the assembled skull was presented Wednesday by the American scientists to their counterparts from Punjab University in northern India and the Geological Survey of India during a Bombay news conference.

Scientists said they hope the discovery will help explain the extinction of the dinosaurs and the shifting of the continents — how India separated from Africa, Madagascar, Australia and Antarctica and collided with Asia.

The dinosaur bones were discovered during the past 18 years by Indian scientists Suresh Srivastava of the Geological Survey of India and Ashok Sahni, a paleontologist at Punjab University.

When the bones were examined, "we realized we had a partial skeleton of an undiscovered species," Sereno said.

The scientists said they believe the Rajasaurus roamed the Southern Hemisphere land masses of present-day Madagascar, Africa and South America.

"People don't realize dinosaurs are the only large-bodied animal that lived, evolved and died at a time when all continents were united," Sereno said.

The cause of the dinosaurs' extinction is still debated by scientists. The Rajasaurus discovery may provide crucial clues, Sereno said.

India has seen quite a few paleontological discoveries recently.

In 1997, villagers discovered about 300 fossilized dinosaur eggs in Pisdura, 440 miles northeast of Bombay, that Indian scientists said were laid by four-legged, long-necked vegetarian creatures.

Indian scientists said the dinosaur embryos in the eggs may have suffocated during volcanic eruptions.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: acanthostega; antarctica; australia; catastrophism; crevolist; dino; dinosaurs; godsgravesglyphs; ichthyostega; india; madagascar; narmadabasin; narmadensis; paleontology; rajasaurus; rino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 941-960961-980981-1,000 ... 3,121-3,129 next last
To: Ichneumon
They're only running from God,

You are mistaken, but that's a common misbelief for some reason I have yet to figure out.

Oh, that's an easy one to understand. It's a throwaway line, like, "Republicans are the party of the rich!" or "People who are against the War on Drugs just want to get high!", or, "Americans are just imperialists who want to take over the world!", or "All gun owners want to do is kill!"

Making sweeping generalizations about one's opponents saves one the trouble of actually understanding what they think, and why they think as they do.

961 posted on 08/18/2003 2:15:09 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 889 | View Replies]

To: Da_Shrimp
Again, I haven't studied that one, but the evidence that dinosaurs have existed more recently than the column suggests is there. Just theorizing here, but it could simply be that the Mammoths and the dinosaurs preferred different climates or regions. In creation science, the climate of the earth pre-flood and post-flood are two different things. Before the flood, the climate was probably pretty comforable all over the planet. After the flood, there were colder and warmer regions and species either adapted to their new climate or died off. Mammoths and elephants being so similar, perhaps some settled in northern regions and with the ice age did not survive, and some settled in southern regions and adapted to the climate (as in Africa).
962 posted on 08/18/2003 2:15:09 PM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 952 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Incorrect. A mammoth was found in Newark, Ohio- Ohio being a prime area for Trilobites.
963 posted on 08/18/2003 2:16:20 PM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 958 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
I also hope you understand that finding a mammoth fossil and a hadrosaur fossil in the same state (say, California) is not the same as finding a hadrosaur and a mammoth fossil in the same strata.
964 posted on 08/18/2003 2:17:26 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 944 | View Replies]

To: stripes1776
Smoked head cheese in a hog bung casing?
965 posted on 08/18/2003 2:17:47 PM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (Defund NPR, PBS and the LSC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 407 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl; Aric2000; All
I keep hoping that someone from the Evolution camp will bring issues of non-compliance from their own side.

As a point of information, I was trying to think of a polite way of mentioning this. But since I can't think of any way to do it without ruffling feathers, let me say...I am more than a little disappointed.

A scab won't heal, folks, if you keep picking at it. To those in the Evo camp who are continuing to argue legalistic minutiae, I say...Knock it off!

'Nuff said???

966 posted on 08/18/2003 2:18:56 PM PDT by Aracelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 806 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
Truth be told, I see no problem whatsoever. I myself disagree with it, but the poster stated his opinion politely, and he's entitled to it.
967 posted on 08/18/2003 2:19:15 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 959 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
Ohio being a prime area for Trilobites.

Sorta like Europe being a prime area for Bulgarians.

968 posted on 08/18/2003 2:20:27 PM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 963 | View Replies]

To: stripes1776
Smoked head cheese in a hog bung casing?
969 posted on 08/18/2003 2:20:33 PM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (Defund NPR, PBS and the LSC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 407 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
Incorrect. A mammoth was found in Newark, Ohio- Ohio being a prime area for Trilobites.

How old is Ohio? Do you understand the fallacy of the argument you are making here?

970 posted on 08/18/2003 2:21:10 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 963 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Incidentally, if you are referring to layer, trilobites were sea creatures (interesting they are found in great numbers in Ohio) and Mammoths were land. Trilobites would naturally be at a bottom layer while mammoths would be higher up since the trilobite was already in the water.
971 posted on 08/18/2003 2:22:57 PM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 958 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
Before the flood, the climate was probably pretty comforable all over the planet.

But wouldn't this imply, by your own argument, that dinosaurs and mammoths/elephants would have lived together and therefore have been fossilised in the same strata during the Flood?

972 posted on 08/18/2003 2:23:15 PM PDT by Da_Shrimp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 962 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Ohio is approximately 4,500 years old, thank you.
973 posted on 08/18/2003 2:23:44 PM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 970 | View Replies]

To: Piltdown_Woman
A scab won't heal, folks, if you keep picking at it. To those in the Evo camp who are continuing to argue legalistic minutiae, I say...Knock it off!

Knocking it off is much worse than picking at it.

(Ducking)

974 posted on 08/18/2003 2:23:51 PM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 966 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
Truth be told, I see no problem whatsoever.

Well, I do see a problem with telling a whole class of people that they are not welcome. And I therefore find that the response ---> Free speech is a problem for you. You should start your own discussion club in your closet where it's relatively safe. to be justified.

975 posted on 08/18/2003 2:25:41 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 967 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
Incidentally, if you are referring to layer, trilobites were sea creatures (interesting they are found in great numbers in Ohio) and Mammoths were land. Trilobites would naturally be at a bottom layer while mammoths would be higher up since the trilobite was already in the water.

So all the marine-environment layers of the geologic column (that thing that doesn't exist) lie below all the land-environment layers?

976 posted on 08/18/2003 2:26:18 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 971 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
I didn't say that. The geological column is frequently not in the right order.
977 posted on 08/18/2003 2:29:06 PM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 976 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
Before the flood, the climate was probably pretty comforable all over the planet.

So the annual variations seen in samples of Greenland ice, which date back to at least 50,000 BC and can be correlated with known historical events like volcanic eruptions, arose how?

978 posted on 08/18/2003 2:32:25 PM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 962 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
I didn't say that. The geological column is frequently not in the right order.

Please define the "right" order, and contrast it with your explanation of what would be the "wrong" order.

979 posted on 08/18/2003 2:33:07 PM PDT by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 977 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
You are assuming they are annual. That is a wrong assumption.
980 posted on 08/18/2003 2:34:02 PM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 978 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 941-960961-980981-1,000 ... 3,121-3,129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson