Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Right Wing Professor
You are assuming they are annual. That is a wrong assumption.
980 posted on 08/18/2003 2:34:02 PM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 978 | View Replies ]


To: DittoJed2
We know they're annual in the historical past, because we can count back layers until we find ones that contain volcanic dust, which we can correlate with known volcanic eruptions. We can also date CO2 in the layers. They give an entirely consistent picture for the histrocial period; so why did we go from 1/year oscillations in the historical period to 20/year oscillations earlier?
985 posted on 08/18/2003 2:42:49 PM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 980 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson