Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Da_Shrimp
Again, I haven't studied that one, but the evidence that dinosaurs have existed more recently than the column suggests is there. Just theorizing here, but it could simply be that the Mammoths and the dinosaurs preferred different climates or regions. In creation science, the climate of the earth pre-flood and post-flood are two different things. Before the flood, the climate was probably pretty comforable all over the planet. After the flood, there were colder and warmer regions and species either adapted to their new climate or died off. Mammoths and elephants being so similar, perhaps some settled in northern regions and with the ice age did not survive, and some settled in southern regions and adapted to the climate (as in Africa).
962 posted on 08/18/2003 2:15:09 PM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 952 | View Replies ]


To: DittoJed2
Before the flood, the climate was probably pretty comforable all over the planet.

But wouldn't this imply, by your own argument, that dinosaurs and mammoths/elephants would have lived together and therefore have been fossilised in the same strata during the Flood?

972 posted on 08/18/2003 2:23:15 PM PDT by Da_Shrimp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 962 | View Replies ]

To: DittoJed2
Before the flood, the climate was probably pretty comforable all over the planet.

So the annual variations seen in samples of Greenland ice, which date back to at least 50,000 BC and can be correlated with known historical events like volcanic eruptions, arose how?

978 posted on 08/18/2003 2:32:25 PM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 962 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson