Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Let BRAVO Know What You THINK About Their Homosexual Agenda!
07/29/03 | Kieri

Posted on 07/29/2003 6:25:52 AM PDT by Kieri

This morning I decided to let BRAVO have an earful. Here is my email:

"As a DirecTV subscriber, I am notifying you I am permanently blocking BRAVO from my menu on my DSS receiver.

Your push for homosexual-'friendly' programming demonstrates your pandering to an audience that exhibits behavior that is not only detrimental to their own health, but the health and safety of families everywhere. I refuse to risk allowing my children to see promo material on your channel, so I find it necessary to block BRAVO and will encourage others to do so. Your advertisers will no longer reach me or my family members, and I have let DirecTV know of our all too easy decision to block BRAVO.

You may consider a homosexual audience on worthy of pursuit, but families who treasure their own lifestyles think otherwise."

I encourage others to let both BRAVO and their cable/DSS companies know that you're blocking their agenda-pushing programming!

BRAVO's "Contact Us" page is here:

http://www.bravotv.com/Contact_Us/

OR you can smail mail them here:

Bravo Viewer Relations
c/o NBC Entertainment
3000 W. Alameda Ave.
Burbank, CA 90036


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: atheists; biglie; bisexualsmakeachoice; bornheterosexual; boycott; boycottnbc; bravo; cabletelevision; cabletv; catholiclist; causedbyenvironment; cheerleaders; christianhating; christophobes; culture; culturewar; directtv; downourthroats; gay; gaybashers; gaymenschorus; gays; gaytrolldolls; hairbrainedstudies; hedonists; hollywierd; homonazi; homophobes; homosexual; homosexualagenda; homosexuallobby; homosexuallobbyists; homosexuals; homosexualtrolls; indoctrination; lavendermafia; lesbian; libertarians; libertines; nbc; nogeneticcomponent; peckingparty; perversion; prosodomycrowd; pseudoscience; queer; queereye; religionbashing; repressedinthecloset; rinos; samesexdisorder; sexaddicts; sexualdeviance; sexualdeviants; sierrabravo; sodomites; sodomizers; standfornothing; television; theususalsuspects; trashtv; tv; usefulidiots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 561-580581-600601-620 ... 801-811 next last
To: finnman69
I like Comedy Central's "Trading Babies."
581 posted on 07/30/2003 7:05:31 AM PDT by paulklenk (Freedom isn't free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: paulklenk
The gay shows are "Brain Dead TV."
Who in the world would actually sit in front of a TV and watch gay shows? The Wheel of Fortune is more educational!
Science, History, Fox news, are all great channels. People might actually use their grey matter watching these programs.
No wonder America is so dumbed down and brainwashed. People need to GET A LIFE!
582 posted on 07/30/2003 7:39:40 AM PDT by concerned about politics ("He who controls communications rules the world." - Adolf Hitler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 581 | View Replies]

To: Lysander
I do. I read it every day. I teach it.

To whom? Where?
Are you a college professor, clergy, what?

583 posted on 07/30/2003 7:40:18 AM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 576 | View Replies]

To: ChiMark
"Where do you draw the line? Our constitution is filled with law governing right and wrong"

Really? Where in the Constitution are there laws governing right and wrong. I see treason treated there, but that's about it. Perhaps it's time for you to reread that document. It's not a document that sets laws for specific things. It's a document that establishes our system of government and details rights in its amendments. What it does not do is establish any particular laws.
584 posted on 07/30/2003 8:19:54 AM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 518 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
Queer Eye was great last night. The best one with funny as hell lines and it was great tv.

It was sick.

I dont' think that guy was straight at all. I've never seen straight men handfeeding each other exotic chocolates. Or letting sodomites feel them up or try to fling themselves into his arms. How many normal men spend the day with five flaming queens to get ready to propose? Did you even notice how much more physically intimate and comfortable he was throughout the show with flaming sodomites than he was with his supposed sweetheart?

BTW, did you notice that the skin care had caused the guy to break out by the time the show ended? It was visible even in the dim lighting. Notice the guy's attire, a sodomite wet dream, when he first answered the door?

I've concluded that the fashion queen is a woman with a penis. And their breathless suspense and celebration at how they got the sap 'engaged' was pretty stupid.

I conclude the entire deal was a simple con job. They found a gay male model, probably a failing one. They paired him up for a fake proposal with his best friend, a straight woman. The whole thing was a scam so he could get the exposure and so the swishers would have a male attractive enough to keep the sodomite and women viewers' interest.

Fake, fake, fake. Some people are so gullible.
585 posted on 07/30/2003 8:23:31 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 569 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
Agreed, Boy Meets Boy appears that it will be a very cruel show and not very entertaining.

The premise is nasty. Throwing in straight guys and luring them to seduce the 'star' to win $25,000 is even sicker.

I scanned it via Tivo and would be amazed that anyone thought it was entertaining.

Probably the most interesting portion was about the sodomite-mother-surrogate, Andra, the star's straight best friend (female). One would think that the common mother-surrogate relationship that so many sodomites have would be too revealing of sodomite psychology.

BTW, for all men reading this thread, do not date or marry any woman whose best friend is a sodomite male. Flee from any such woman.
586 posted on 07/30/2003 8:28:21 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 570 | View Replies]

To: VetsRule
Your citations (particularly on Freund) are erroneous and taken out of context.

Freunds data is not erroneous, what are you talking about?

Kurt Freund actually studied two groups and found that gay men responded no more to male child stimuli than heterosexual men responded to female child stimuli.

Two groups? Are you talking about the control group for Freund /Watson 92’, another study, Freund’s silly phalometer study? Usually when someone cites a study it’s customary to actually cite what study you’re talking about, methinks you are just parroting the gobbledygook from rainbowallianceopenfaith.homestead.com

He also described the notion that gay men are more likely than straight men to be child molesters as a "myth".

Cold hard data is not a “myth”, homosexuals offend at a greater rate than heterosexuals, those figures are from Freund’s research and unless you can debunk them it looks like you’ve got to live with that reality.

The Schmidt article

It was a book sweetheart, now I know you really don’t know what you are talking about.

(just like the "Family Research Council" studies)

Again it’s customary to actually cite a study when citing a study, it helps us to know what the heck you are talking about. The FRC has done studies?

that you cite is a joke, and is not worth further comment.

Excellent analysis, caulk full of facts and compelling insight why Schmidt’s book is wrong. Actually, homosexual reviews of his book were very positive except for chapter 6, should you ever find the time to read it maybe you can tell me what you disagree with?

I would also note (with credit on the specifics to various Google searches...the general information has been out there for years) the following findings from the PEER-REVIEWED journal "Pediatrics" in July of 1994:

Again it’s customary to actually cite which “study" you are talking about, never heard of a journal called “Pediatrics” but I’ll trust you…methinks the following are just a bunch of statistics from rainbowallianceopenfaith.homestead.com from the outcome based Carol Jenny study in ONE hospital in Denver, she too presumed you’re not a homosexual if you have same-sex sexual relations. Rather laughable don’t you think?

The rest of your cut and paste job is just more propaganda from rainbowallianceopenfaith.homestead.com, should you ever have the capacity to discuss the actual “studies” intelligently let me know, otherwise be prepared to stand in a long line of uninformed homosexual propagandists that get ZOTed of FR here lately. Id’ be careful posting homosexual BS if I were you.

Whoops saw this at the end.

Also, please see: http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/html/facts_molestation.html

Ah yes Dr. Herek’s web site…you know he’s a self-serving homosexual “Psychologist” from the APA’s Division 44 don’t you? Need I say more?

587 posted on 07/30/2003 8:29:56 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 549 | View Replies]

To: Imagine
Your post is spot on. It describes what happened when the Nazis overtook Germany. Berlin was the hub of sodomy. In the period between the world wars, it was the sodomite center of the world, very much like San Francisco is today.
588 posted on 07/30/2003 8:31:39 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 578 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
Probably the most interesting portion was about the sodomite-mother-surrogate, Andra, the star's straight best friend (female). One would think that the common mother-surrogate relationship that so many sodomites have would be too revealing of sodomite psychology.

I was trying to see if that woman was married. She was a frightening fag-hag and clearly in her environment to be worshipped by men who have zero sexual interest in her.She had spooky spooky eyes. Seeing the promo for the next show where the gays dirty dance in a group date is nasty. Not too mention that there are some straight guys willing to do that for money. IMO they are not straight.

Interesting enough, the show had almost no sponsors other than advertising for other Bravo shows...oh and Amaretto, and Mexico Tourism. This show will die of bad ratings. On the other hand, I predict Queer Eye will be a break out hit.

589 posted on 07/30/2003 8:35:51 AM PDT by finnman69 (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 586 | View Replies]

To: Kieri
National Butt Order!
590 posted on 07/30/2003 8:37:15 AM PDT by usslsm51 (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sakic
Is there any similar information proving your assertion in regular scientific studies?

Hehehe…What’s irregular about Freund’s study? His data is cited by more than just Christian organizations and to date no study debunks his findings…

You’re a little bit out of your element aren’t you? Shouldn’t you be worrying about your next porno movie or have your birds pooped on your head again?

591 posted on 07/30/2003 8:37:19 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 564 | View Replies]

To: WestPacSailor
Or, perhaps, the neighbors kids are watching that crap on TV and decide to try out what they saw on Queer TV with your children.

They might also want to play doctor or shoot someone because all kids will try everything they see on TV, right?

592 posted on 07/30/2003 8:46:16 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
Maybe at some point, you'll wake up to the fact that last night's Queer Eye had no straight man in it. At least, Boy Meets Boy was honest about having normal males in the sodomite mix.

I should see if it's still on my Tivo. I could go through and document all the gayish behavior the supposedly straight male was engaging in. I now recall he let the sodomites undress him (yeah, most men allow that) and that when he came down off the ladder, the cook grabbed him in a hug from behind and did a little crotch-to-butt rubbing while making a lewd suggestion. Oh, sure, normal men let sodomites do that stuff to them all the time. Just a part of getting ready to propose to your sweetheart. Happens all the time.
593 posted on 07/30/2003 8:46:52 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 589 | View Replies]

To: Kieri
I must say that homosexuality is a danger to the family. As a parent, I am now aware of how it affects the family.

A few days ago I realized why. My 18 year old daughter has a friend who always seemed to be a nice girl. My 14 year old told me that this friend was bisexual. I know this same girl also has a 5 year old son. Being aware that people make mistakes, I welcomed this girl into my home. I don't regret that at all. However, when my 18 year old admitted that this was true, I had to say no to her going a surprise birthday party at this girls house. You no why I said no? Because this girl really does have some very good personal qualities. And it is out of respect for her "better self" that I told my daughter that she must not condone a very self-destructive life-style that is sure to include increasing confusion, self-abuse, promiscuity, and possible drug abuse.


And in addition, I don't want my own daughter, (who has a very nice boyfriend) to become confused about the difference between right and wrong. Because once the line between the two becomes blurred, it becomes a straight line to a life that is a living hell.


And I am not even thinking about the consequences after death, because the consequences BEFORE death are just too much to bear or EVEN contemplate.

Homosexuality and the acceptance of it affects even hetrosexuals. Because after all, if it's ok to have sex with the same sex, then why is it wrong to do drugs? Sleep around outside of marraige? Have children out of wedlock? The fact is, homosexuality is a taboo. And when a person decides that an obvious wrong is a right, then where does one stop? It affects us all.
594 posted on 07/30/2003 8:48:14 AM PDT by rodeo-mamma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12
"How is that conversion? They cleaned these guys up, cleaned their apartments, gave them a recipe for some good food, and filmed it. Oh the humanity."

LOL

"If this was a show about how 4 gay men, try to turn a guy into their S&M slave I would genuinely see your point. Until then..."

Come on, Doggy -- I'm sure even you can connect a dot or two...

595 posted on 07/30/2003 8:53:05 AM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 523 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12
"How is that conversion? They cleaned these guys up, cleaned their apartments, gave them a recipe for some good food, and filmed it. Oh the humanity."

LOL

"If this was a show about how 4 gay men, try to turn a guy into their S&M slave I would genuinely see your point. Until then..."

Come on, Doggy -- I'm sure even you can connect a dot or two...

596 posted on 07/30/2003 8:53:07 AM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 523 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
Yes, you obviously are the end all authority on who is gay and who is not. What was I thinking not trusting your gaydar, especially when you insinuated I was gay.

597 posted on 07/30/2003 8:53:58 AM PDT by finnman69 (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 593 | View Replies]

To: CardCarryingMember.VastRightWC
While that was a very interesting historical perspective (seriously), the bottom line is that religious discrimination is illegal TODAY, and that that is a standard based on behavior, not immutable characteristics.

VR

598 posted on 07/30/2003 9:02:11 AM PDT by VetsRule (PS: I Am Not a Libertarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 554 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
BTW. Queer Eye was great last night. The best one with funny as hell lines and it was great tv. The straight guy was a hero and his girlfriend said yes to the wedding proposal. The Boy Meets Boy show was quite boring and likely will ebcome a train wreck as it capitalizes on embarassing the crap out of a human being.

Hell yes, although I still really like the first episode, just for the sheer "before/after" shock value. But this one was great, too. I was really pulling for the guy, and his intended's pause (or was that just the editing, I wonder) was dramatic!

VR

599 posted on 07/30/2003 9:04:14 AM PDT by VetsRule ("Queer Eye for the Straight Guy" Is Good TV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 569 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
I'm afraid we'll have to agree to disagree. Oh, and I'm no more of a propagandist than you are; I'm just sick of the notion that conservatism must equal mean-spirited bigotry.

VR

600 posted on 07/30/2003 9:06:19 AM PDT by VetsRule ("Queer Eye for the Straight Guy" Is Good TV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 587 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 561-580581-600601-620 ... 801-811 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson