Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Let BRAVO Know What You THINK About Their Homosexual Agenda!
07/29/03 | Kieri

Posted on 07/29/2003 6:25:52 AM PDT by Kieri

This morning I decided to let BRAVO have an earful. Here is my email:

"As a DirecTV subscriber, I am notifying you I am permanently blocking BRAVO from my menu on my DSS receiver.

Your push for homosexual-'friendly' programming demonstrates your pandering to an audience that exhibits behavior that is not only detrimental to their own health, but the health and safety of families everywhere. I refuse to risk allowing my children to see promo material on your channel, so I find it necessary to block BRAVO and will encourage others to do so. Your advertisers will no longer reach me or my family members, and I have let DirecTV know of our all too easy decision to block BRAVO.

You may consider a homosexual audience on worthy of pursuit, but families who treasure their own lifestyles think otherwise."

I encourage others to let both BRAVO and their cable/DSS companies know that you're blocking their agenda-pushing programming!

BRAVO's "Contact Us" page is here:

http://www.bravotv.com/Contact_Us/

OR you can smail mail them here:

Bravo Viewer Relations
c/o NBC Entertainment
3000 W. Alameda Ave.
Burbank, CA 90036


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: atheists; biglie; bisexualsmakeachoice; bornheterosexual; boycott; boycottnbc; bravo; cabletelevision; cabletv; catholiclist; causedbyenvironment; cheerleaders; christianhating; christophobes; culture; culturewar; directtv; downourthroats; gay; gaybashers; gaymenschorus; gays; gaytrolldolls; hairbrainedstudies; hedonists; hollywierd; homonazi; homophobes; homosexual; homosexualagenda; homosexuallobby; homosexuallobbyists; homosexuals; homosexualtrolls; indoctrination; lavendermafia; lesbian; libertarians; libertines; nbc; nogeneticcomponent; peckingparty; perversion; prosodomycrowd; pseudoscience; queer; queereye; religionbashing; repressedinthecloset; rinos; samesexdisorder; sexaddicts; sexualdeviance; sexualdeviants; sierrabravo; sodomites; sodomizers; standfornothing; television; theususalsuspects; trashtv; tv; usefulidiots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 801-811 next last
To: MineralMan
Why should you care? I know for fact that enough people
like the Million dads and freerepublic, and 20 other
forums will create a ground swell and in the past we have
made a big difference, just look at the results at milliondads.com.

We have had many advertisers pull support, as on the sheild,
and other shows.

So your post of not doing anything, is like asking us to avoid a subject that we cannot, as conservatives,
afterall, sodom and gomorah were condemed in the Holy
Bible, maybe not in the Texas Courts, I choose
the Holy Bible as my rule of law.

Ops4 God Bless America!

OPs4
161 posted on 07/29/2003 11:07:48 AM PDT by OPS4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: sakic
Is any else sick of these fags as I am?

Try to cut down a bit.

162 posted on 07/29/2003 11:08:07 AM PDT by Bluntpoint (Not there! Yes, there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
They've already been programmed by liberal TV programs - and the parents watch with glee as their little brains of mush get twisted.

That means that if you were a child today you'd have a good chance of being a homosexual.

I knew lots of homosexuals while growing up but it never interested me as a lifestyle. Maybe some of us are more heterosexual than others.

163 posted on 07/29/2003 11:08:33 AM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: litehaus; new cruelty; MichiganConservative
BRAVO is owned by NBC, no?

Yes. NBC bought them just a few months ago. They were looking for a cable outlet for their network shows, just like ABC has ABC Family and CBS has TNN (and MTV ... and VH1 ... and Nickelodeon ... and on and on). For example, The Worst Wing is about to start airing on Bravo in a few weeks (if it hasn't already started).

164 posted on 07/29/2003 11:08:37 AM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Revenge Of Daffy-Duck
Studies show that boys who are molested by men later become men who molest boys. That is not "Biological".

I'm afraid you badly misunderstand the meaning of "biological basis." There are very few behavioral patterns which are solely the result of a "purely" biological or "purely" environmental basis. Yet correlations and trends can easily be determined.

The facts and studies have shown that identical twins, even ones reared apart from each other, have a vastly increased chance of being the same sexuality as each other, compared to non-identical siblings or the general population.

There are also studies showing an decrease in the size of certain glands within the neuroendocrine pathway in homosexuals, compared to non-homosexuals.

Certainly, major trauma on a child can deeply impact that child's development. Any child, male or female, who has been sexually assaulted will have deep scars that only time and much therapy can heal.

That does not change the fact, however, that a real, biological basis for homosexuality exists, despite the best efforts of anti-science people to deny it.

VR

165 posted on 07/29/2003 11:10:30 AM PDT by VetsRule (The Term "Homophobia" Takes on Real Meaning Here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12
Great post.
166 posted on 07/29/2003 11:12:41 AM PDT by Quick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
Please explain it's biological origin.

A decade ago, genes implicating homosexuality in males were isolated to the X chromosome.

Sorry to be the bearer of (apparently) bad news.

VR

167 posted on 07/29/2003 11:12:55 AM PDT by VetsRule (The Term "Homophobia" Takes on Real Meaning Here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: VetsRule
I predict one day scientists will identify a gene defect that is related to homosexuality.
168 posted on 07/29/2003 11:14:38 AM PDT by finnman69 (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Yehuda
Yawn. Please see my posts 165 and 167 for more information. Feel free to ignore me if you like, however. My strong impression of anti-science people has been that they prefer to willfully ignore inconvenient scientific facts when those facts interfere with their prejudices and/or worldview.

VR

169 posted on 07/29/2003 11:15:53 AM PDT by VetsRule (The Term "Homophobia" Takes on Real Meaning Here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: CheezyD
All these types of shows do is make homosexuality seem like it's normal and no big deal. It's like the old proverbial frog in the pan. He doesn't realize he's getting boiled until it's too late. That's what the homosexual agenda is all about, normalizing their behavior.
170 posted on 07/29/2003 11:16:08 AM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD is still in control!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: OPS4
"We have had many advertisers pull support, as on the sheild,
and other shows. "

OK. Which of those shows are off the air, then? It's your perfect right to do as you wish. You can boycott, send letters, or stand in front of the headquarters of the network holding a sign.

Now, guess which amendment to the Constitution guarantees you those rights? It's the First Amendment, which also guarantees the rights of every other citizen, including those with whom you disagree.

The folks who are making these two admittedly stupid programs on Bravo, have a right to do so. Far as I know, there's no obscenity on either show, so the FCC can't say much.

But, you're free, just as they are, to protest in any legal way you wish. I would not ever deny you that right. But...do keep in mind that others have rights as well to speak their minds and publish their works.

Only if everyone has the right does anyone have the right.
171 posted on 07/29/2003 11:16:19 AM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: AD from SpringBay
Right on! The homosexual agenda is to normalize it so people don't complain about it any more. It's subtle and very dangerous.
172 posted on 07/29/2003 11:17:20 AM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD is still in control!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Yehuda
" No one chooses to be gay." PROVE IT OR RETRACT IT.

Could YOU choose to be gay, right now? Can you suddenly, "bat for the other team", as it were? Personally, I couldn't choose to be gay, which makes me think homosexuals didn't choose, either.
173 posted on 07/29/2003 11:17:41 AM PDT by Quick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Bluntpoint
Huh?
174 posted on 07/29/2003 11:17:47 AM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: OPS4
"just look at the results at milliondads.com.
"

I tried www.milliondads.com and it doesn't exist. Perhaps you'd supply a link?
175 posted on 07/29/2003 11:18:31 AM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
You could have MichiganConservativeSatellite up and running in just a year or two, offering just the channels you think are appropriate to that consuming public out there.

Why did you twist my desire for a new programming plan into a desire to control what other people want? You got a chip on your shoulder or something? In which post did I say I wanted to control what channels YOU can watch? I just think a lot of channels are crap and personally do not want to watch them (such as the Disney channel, CNN, TechTV, Univision, etc).

What is YOUR problem? Your rediculous sarcasm seems to indicate you have one and I believe your sarcasm directed towards me is uncalled for. Can I not have an opinion about the quality of TV programming or the service I get from a company?

176 posted on 07/29/2003 11:19:14 AM PDT by MichiganConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
Wait, they are good looking,stylish and well groomed...they must be gay

No, just about 45 years old each and unfunny.

177 posted on 07/29/2003 11:19:35 AM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary
The best way to "normalize" deviant behavior is thru humor.

What we need is more wholesome monogamous heterosexual emphases, not emphases on the deviants.

178 posted on 07/29/2003 11:19:50 AM PDT by Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Quick1
Could YOU choose to be gay, right now? Can you suddenly, "bat for the other team", as it were? Personally, I couldn't choose to be gay, which makes me think homosexuals didn't choose, either.

Exactly. There have been gay people all throughout history, even during times when to be discovered as gay would have meant near-instant death.

Who the hell would CHOOSE to be that way?

VR

179 posted on 07/29/2003 11:20:10 AM PDT by VetsRule (The Term "Homophobia" Takes on Real Meaning Here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
Do you have kids? I'd be very afraid......
180 posted on 07/29/2003 11:20:23 AM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD is still in control!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 801-811 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson