Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton Flack to Rush: Shut Up About Bin Laden Deal and Broaddrick Rape
NewsMax.com ^ | 3/07/03 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

Posted on 03/07/2003 10:28:10 AM PST by kattracks

Former Clinton press secretary Joe Lockhart angrily defended his old boss yesterday against a 1978 rape allegation and charges that he blew a deal for Osama bin Laden's arrest, after talk radio host Rush Limbaugh suggested the ex-president should be asked about the two scandals during upcoming appearances on CBS's "60 Minutes."

"Bill Clinton won't talk about the stuff the American people really want to know. He's not going to address Juanita Broaddrick or giving the North Koreans two nuclear reactors to play with or rejecting three offers to take custody of bin Laden," Limbaugh said yesterday.

Bristling over the remarks, Lockhart told the Washington Post that the nation's top rated radio talker should "keep his mouth shut."

The ex-press secretary then described Clinton's reported million-dollar "60 Minutes" contract as "just one way to continue being part of the public service system."

Clinton has never denied a rape allegation by Arkansas businesswoman Juanita Broaddrick, who told the Wall Street Journal in Feb. 1999 that he brutally assaulted her in a Little Rock hotel room while he was Arkansas attorney general.

He was asked about Broaddrick's charges just once, in March 1999, and told ABC News reporter Sam Donaldson, "There's been a statement made by my attorney. He speaks for me. I think he spoke quite clearly."

No reporter has ever asked the ex-president about his Feb. 2002 confession that he personally turned down a deal for Osama bin Laden's extradition to the U.S. in 1996.

"We'd been hearing that the Sudanese wanted America to start meeting with them again," Clinton told New York's Long Island Association. "They released him. At the time, 1996, he had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here because we had no basis on which to hold him, though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America."

Hear the bombshell bin Laden admission that Clinton won't discuss on "60 Minutes."

Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:

Clinton Scandals



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: billclinton; bubbaisms; censorship; clintonlegacy; criesoncue; hillary; hillaryism; hitlerism; hitlery; impeachedpresident; itsjustsex; liesoncamera; liesunderoath; osamabinladen; rape; rodham; rushlimbaugh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-190 next last
To: Matchett-PI
Of course I would never listen to any program Clinton is on, and now no one else will have to either.

Anybody picked out a 60 Minutes sponsor to boycott for the duration of BC's tenure? It should be a small-ticket item that is frequently purchased.

101 posted on 03/07/2003 12:10:40 PM PST by TomSmedley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Check Lockhart's chin. You'll find Clinton's DNA.
102 posted on 03/07/2003 12:13:15 PM PST by Lexington Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
"I don't consider anyone who worked for Clinton to be a reliable source of commentary on any issue. You had to be compromised to work for the man."

Especially ol red faced Joe Lockhart. His tenure as press secretary for Bill the rapist was intense. Joe seems to have a problem, along with other Clinton associates (Albright, Berger, et al), they still think that they are running the white house on a parallel universe. Joe, Maddy, Sandy, sit down relax and have a cup of shut the F_ _ _ up!
103 posted on 03/07/2003 12:13:57 PM PST by Rockiesrider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MozartLover
Re #43

Fantastic. Wish I'd been so quick and correct. lol

Fregards,

BTW Did anyone think the brainless Crystal on Rush today made her case. (Sarcasm)
104 posted on 03/07/2003 12:14:54 PM PST by citabria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ironman
Lockhart still has Clinton's DNA dribbling off his chin..

Clinton's Criminal Administration is still trying to deny and avoid their true LEGACY.....as Corrupt, Incompetent, Traitorist criminals.......

The Truth is impossible to bury....

Semper Fi
105 posted on 03/07/2003 12:15:10 PM PST by river rat (War works.....It brings Peace... Give war a chance to destroy Jihadists...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
"In hindsight, after 9-11, I wish I had gotten Bin Laden".

Translation: "I wish 9/11 had happened when I was president. I could have gotten that deal for bin Laden and I would have been a hero and that would have been my legacy."

106 posted on 03/07/2003 12:16:33 PM PST by sweetliberty ("To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Lockhart is just continueing the MO he began as the WORST White House Press Secretary ever......nosing out DeeDee Myers and that kid Carter tried to pass off as his Secretary.
107 posted on 03/07/2003 12:17:55 PM PST by TheClintons-STILLAnti-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
Like Rush said several years ago, "Peace" for socialists mean a lack of opposition.
108 posted on 03/07/2003 12:18:04 PM PST by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Spook86
" I recommend anyone watching 60 Minutes tune out after the last story segment. That way, ratings for the last quarter-hour tank, and the program's overall average drops as well. If the "tuneout" is large enough, CBS will pull the plug on ol' Slick."

I'll do better than that. I'll tune out for the whole thing. I hope it tanks faster than Phil Donohue. Who the heck wants to hear anything that Clinton has to say anyway? I couldn't wait to be able to actually NOT have that @$$h*le invading my home several times a day. I'd be out of my mind to actually invite him back. You have to remember though; this supreme jackass really thinks America loves him.

109 posted on 03/07/2003 12:22:21 PM PST by sweetliberty ("To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Rockiesrider
Yep Lickhart hasn't quite figured it out that he's irrelevent how. Earth to Joe, we're over here.
110 posted on 03/07/2003 12:23:02 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Freeper Caribbean Cruise May 31-June 7, Staterooms As Low As $510 Per Person For Entire Week!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Lexington Green
Check Lockhart's chin. You'll find Clinton's DNA.

Ye gods, do you think he wears a thong too?

111 posted on 03/07/2003 12:26:01 PM PST by Wil H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
"CBS could replace Bob with, say ... Ann Coulter?"

Teehee....now THAT I'd pay to watch! Of course, we all know that no way will Clinton ever take on a REAL woman; although I'll admit I'd love to hear what Ann would say to him when he tried to come on to her in the "green" room. Hidden camera anybody? ROTFL!

112 posted on 03/07/2003 12:26:03 PM PST by sweetliberty ("To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
As Dashole said, "this sounds like Limbaugh-like threats to me. Such things should not be allowed as they might bring on the kooks with guns and then I'm not safe" (or words to that effect). Lockhart is remembered as the worst apologist for the multiple escapades of the Felon ever seen in any administration. The guy is nothing more than another clintinoid cretin needing jail time.
113 posted on 03/07/2003 12:26:13 PM PST by Paulus Invictus (Coke make)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dead Dog
I don't think we will see much 'debate' here.
Don't they normally do a 'point-counterpoint' format, where one week
Dole would lead off about the 'good of Viagra' and clinton
would get a couple of minutes to present the 'evil of Viagra'?
That way they don't really have to respond to anyone or anything, nice and safe....

TIME TO DUST OFF THE SHELVES AND REINSTITUTE THE

"DON'T BUY BOOKS FROM CROOKS" mantra....
114 posted on 03/07/2003 12:28:57 PM PST by xrmusn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Aint that the truth, just like the Mafi, and the Father of Lies himself.

I met a very rational Brittish couple while watching the 4th of July celebration in Seattle (this was in 2000). Typical of so many British, they loved Clinton and couldn't understand why so many were against him. They were a little shocked when I suggested to them he was a tyrannt that would do anything to keep power. Funny thing is, I also suggest they watch the 2000 election, that it would be a political bloodbath. I hope they enjoyed the show.

The Democrats have become the poster children for distributed power and gun ownership.

115 posted on 03/07/2003 12:29:08 PM PST by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
In a case like this, you have to ask yourself, "Why?". Why would Bill Clinton mention Rush Limbaugh when talking about his own new gig.

The answer is simple. It doesn't matter if they love you or hate you, as long as they get the name right. Publicity. Bill Clinton knows how many people listen to Rush each day. He lured Rush into a fight and Rush, once again, blindly jumped right in. By doing this, Bill Clinton has ensured that Rush will generate a viewing audience Monday evening that CBS could only have hoped for.

116 posted on 03/07/2003 12:31:50 PM PST by Hatteras (The Thundering Herd Of Turtles ROCK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
I think Slick is trying to draw Rush out. Trying to provoke him into firing everything he's got at the Clintons so when Hillary runs for President, she can say..."You know, that's old news and there's no proof."
117 posted on 03/07/2003 12:41:59 PM PST by FryingPan101 (I love Rummy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
I think you're right. However, had he been a diligent, caring leader, rather than disgusting piece of garbage that he was and is, he could have had Bin Laden and MORE of them and likely the revealed plans of their future actions and fulfilled the duties of a President that were entrusted to him.

In the long run, his true colors were revealed before the entire nation and we have learned that "THE PEOPLE CAN BE TURNED TO ELECT AN UNPRINCIPLED LEADER. In hindsight however, had he been impeached, we would have wound up with Gore and he's such a dork, I'm not sure where the hell we would be. I would guess that is how many people who voted against his removal felt and wisely so.

I STAND WITH MY PRESIDENT. I BELIEVE HE IS TRYING TO PROTECT US WITH EVERY FORCE AVAILABLE. SADDAM MUST BE REMOVED BEFORE HE SELLS SOME OF HIS GOODS IF HE HASN'T ALREADY.

118 posted on 03/07/2003 12:44:20 PM PST by Sacajaweau (Hillary: Constitutional Scholar! NOT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Wil H
Too bad CBS is the wuss network. Your idea would pull more viewers. Then again, CBS doesn't care about viewers, they care about sucking up to Clinton. I keep forgetting...:

Actually, I think the perfect pairing would be clinton v Coulter.

119 posted on 03/07/2003 12:58:24 PM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Wil H
Too bad CBS is the wuss network. Your idea would pull more viewers. Then again, CBS doesn't care about viewers, they care about sucking up to Clinton. I keep forgetting...:

Actually, I think the perfect pairing would be clinton v Coulter.

120 posted on 03/07/2003 12:58:26 PM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-190 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson