Skip to comments.
Gun Control "LOGIC"
NRA Magazine: America's First Freedom Jan 2003 ^
| January 2003
| Kentucky Coalition for Concealed Carry
Posted on 01/01/2003 1:09:16 PM PST by ExSoldier
The Kentucky coalition to Carry Concealed recently published some examples of gun control logic on its web site. Weve included some of the more interesting tidbits here, with thanks to that organization.
Banning guns works, which is why New York, D.C., and Chicago cops need guns.
Washington DCs low murder rate of 69 per 100,000 is due to strict gun control, and Indianapolis high murder rate of 9 per 100,000 is due to the lack of gun control.
An intruder will be incapacitated by tear gas or oven spray, but if shot with a .357 magnum, will get angry and kill you.
A woman raped and strangled is morally superior to a woman with a smoking gun and a dead rapist at her feet.
The New England Journal of Medicine is filled with expert advice about guns; just like Guns & Ammo has some excellent treatises on heart surgery
One should consult an automotive engineer for safewr seatbelts, a civil engineer for a better bridge, a surgeon for internal medicine, a computer programmer for hard drive problems and Sarah Brady for firearms expertise.
The Second Amendment, ratified in 1791 refers to the National Guard, which was created 112 years later in 1903.
These phrases: The right of the people peaceably to assemble, right of the people to be secure in their homes. enumeration of herein of certain rights shall not be construed to disparage others retained by the people, and The powers not delegated herein are reserved to the states respectively and to the people all refer to individuals, but the right of the people to keep and bear arms refers to the state.
The NRAs dont touch campaign about kids handling guns is propaganda, but the anti-gun lobbys attempt to run a dont touch campaign is responsible social activity.
Most people cant be trusted, so we should have laws against guns, which most people will abide by because they can be trusted.
Citizens dont need to carry a gun for personal protection, but police chiefs who are deskbound administrators who work in a building filled with cops, need a gun.
Trigger locks do not interfere with the ability to use a gun for defensive purposes, which is why you see police officers with one on their duty weapons.
Handgun Control, Inc. says it wants to keep guns out of the wrong hands.
Guess what?
YOU have the wrong hands.
TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Free Republic; Government; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: banglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
I think with the not so surprising revelation that Daschle is going to throw his hat into the Demcratic ring, and that the assault weapons/mag ban law is due to sunset in one year while the antigun groups have united together to not only make it permanent, but to make it far more encompassing and eliminate any grandfather or possession loopholes. The next election may well hold the key to our enduring freedoms, and these little gems of "logic" had better be on the minds of everyone; not just here on FR but with your friends and family who don't participate here. Because this ugly and false "logic" also applies to other areas the liberals wish to influence like health care, social security, terrorism and the military.
1
posted on
01/01/2003 1:09:16 PM PST
by
ExSoldier
To: ExSoldier
bttt.............
2
posted on
01/01/2003 1:38:23 PM PST
by
litehaus
To: ExSoldier; *bang_list
Bang Bump.
To: ExSoldier
Bump
4
posted on
01/01/2003 2:54:18 PM PST
by
Fiddlstix
To: ExSoldier
When I think about the reauthorization of the gun bans in the 1994 Crime Bill and the additional gun control that the Democrats will want to pass, I realize how much it matters that we weren't able to win the South Dakota and Louisiana senate seats. We needed those two seats to be filled with real Americans and not gun-grabbing liberals.
I Resolve for a Free New Year
Bill
5
posted on
01/01/2003 3:25:14 PM PST
by
WFTR
To: ExSoldier
Here is a one for you.
When crime goes down, the gun control crowd claim that it is due to recent gun control and that MORE gun control is needed to save even more lives.
When crime in the same area goes back up, they claim that the gun control laws are ineffective and that MORE gun control is needed to reduce crime.
To: WFTR
Bill, unfortunately, it is estimated that if the bill comes up to reauthorize the AW ban, that the Senate will pass it. Remember, we have at least four RINOs that can't be counted on. However, in the House, many of the Democrats are from rural areas where guns are common and the 2nd Amendment is sacred.
Don't count on Bush to veto it if it comes to his desk before the election though.
To: Blood of Tyrants
Sadly, I must agree with you on all points. My thought regarding the Senate was that a 53-46-1 split might have changed the committees to the point where the ban could be choked in a committee and not come to a vote.
I Resolve for a Free New Year
Bill
8
posted on
01/01/2003 7:09:31 PM PST
by
WFTR
To: litehaus
Some legal scholar correct me if I am wrong:
The fact that a felon swears falsly that he is not an thus attempts to buy a gun can not be used against him in court on the basis of the fifth amendment as this would be self incrimination if he said he was a felon.
9
posted on
01/01/2003 7:52:07 PM PST
by
cpdiii
To: cpdiii
Well, I'm not a lawyer, but I have been to law school and one of the things presented in both my CON (Constitutional) and Criminal Law classes is exactly that point. For a felon to register his illegally held guns is a violation of his 5th Amendment rights against self incrimination. What sweet irony! LOL
To: ExSoldier; cpdiii
by their own logic, the house and senate should ban personal posession and make us all felons; then we would truly all be outlaws, and wouldn't have to register anything...
To: WFTR
Q: How do I access the bang list?
To: ExSoldier; Tunehead54
Q: How do I access the bang list? I don't know. I'm a little afraid of being on another list, so I haven't tried to join. I found this thread just by scrolling through lists of new posts. I hope that Tunehead54 will know more than I do and can answer your question.
13
posted on
01/04/2003 9:26:17 AM PST
by
WFTR
To: ExSoldier
....to ensure peace, security and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable. The very atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interferencethey deserve a place of honor with all that's good. (George Washington, 1790)
14
posted on
01/04/2003 11:01:00 AM PST
by
expatpat
To: ExSoldier
Click on the browse button on a thread page.
Then go to search for user.
Type in *bang_list and push enter/search.
That's it. It changed a bit from the old format of searching for posts and replies.
Regards
15
posted on
01/04/2003 11:50:53 AM PST
by
wardaddy
To: ExSoldier
Technically.....use the find in forum scroll at the top of a browse page and type in *bang_list in the window for poster.
Sorry for having to clarify.
16
posted on
01/04/2003 11:53:06 AM PST
by
wardaddy
To: ExSoldier
I found this site http://flashbunny.org/ yesterday, they got some funny animations that break it down so even Libs might be able to understand why they are wrong about the theory only the Gov't should have the guns.
To: OXENinFLA
To: cpdiii
I'm no legal expert, but that's what I understand. It's stupider than an Austin Powers movie.
To: packrat01
I wish I'd said that!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson