Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberals Planning for Vatican III
"Crisis Magazine" via Catholicity.com ^ | May 13, 2002 | Deal Hudson

Posted on 05/13/2002 6:27:38 PM PDT by Siobhan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: Lael
As far as the Vatican is concerned, you will have to take into consideration sovereign immunity since the Vatican is a sovereign nation. As far as the necessity for a Vatican III or even the desireability of such a thing, there has been exactly one council convened in the last 150 years. That was the Second Vatican Council of the 1960s, in retrospect a rank disaster. I rather doubt that there will be any more councils during the lifetime of anyone who experienced the aftermath of the last one.

Money is only money. Councils are called for reasons of doctrine such as the Council of Trent (known as the Counterreformation Council) called almost 150 years after Luther tacked his theses to the cathedral door at Wittenberg when immediate enthusiasms had passed and a due period of deliberation had been afforded. The First Vatican Council of the mid-19th Century defined the long-held internal Church belief in the doctrine of infallibility.

When Vatican II was improvidently called by the overly optimistic John XXIII (who would not, at his age, have to live with the consequences as have many of us), he proclaimed a desire to open the windows of the Church to allow the fresh air to enter in a "spirit of aggiornamento". This was basically a way of saying that 1960s liberals and worse, Catholic style, had a lot of itches that wanted scratching after orthodox pontificates such as those of Pope Pius IX (1846-1878), Pope Leo XIII (1878-1903), Pope St. Pius X (1903-1914), Pope Pius XI (1923-1939) and Pope Pius XII (1939-1958). The only relief that the liberal termites had was the pontificate of Pope Benedict XV (1914-1923) who cancelled improvidently the anti-modernist loyalty and purge requirements of Pope St. Pius X. Even Benedict codified Canon Law although his legacy is that he gave the modernist heretics the little hidey hole that allowed them to survive.

Well, John XXIII opened the windows and the aroma of sanctity wafted out the windows to be replaced by the stench of multiplying incestuous heresies festering just beneath the surface (which had been too fearful of Pope Pius XII to show their ugly heads in public within the Church) and the licentious Gramscian obsessions polluting the modern world outside the Church.

In the early part of his pontificate, Pope Paul VI observed publicly as to the result: "The smoke of Satan surrounds our altars." Let it be observed that Paul VI, while sound enough on birth control to reject an initiative by a committee appointed by his predecessor and to issue the encyclical Humanae Vitae to rule out artificial birth control once and for all (largely written by a then obscure Polish Archbishop Karol Wojtlywa who is now John Paul II), was nonetheless a raging liberal in Church terms.

It was only with the election of Albino Cardinal Luciani, Patriarch of Venice, as Pope John Paul I and his very short but orthodox pontificate and the election of John Paul II and his long pontificate that orthodoxy began to be restored. The next pope's prime challenge is the complete restoration of orthodoxy. When the Church is orthodox, money and vocations flourish. No one wants to fund or make lifetime commitments with real sacrifices to a Church whose leaders grovel before the trend of the week.

Pope John Paul II has appointed a College of Cardinals who will see to it that his papacy will be followed by one which will enthusiastically take up the task of purging the clergy of the net results of the Woodstock moral mud bath that was the legacy of "the spirit of Vatican II", including so many sexually disordered people who have infested the seminaries and the rectories and even many chanceries here since.

In short, a Church council is an extraordinary event which ought not to be called any more often than absolutely necessary (marked in centuries normally, not years) and then only to confirm aggressively some long-held doctrine of strictly orthodox purpose not yet formally defined and then promulgated only with the specific approval of the pope.

The bishops are not some sort of board of directors or some sort of legislature. They are more like executives who are successors of the apostles (who did not make moral decisions by democratic vote) who usually have diocesan responsibilities to govern. As the performance of some of them remind us, Judas too was an apostle. Fortunately, as with the original 12, predominantly we have John the Evangelist or James the Greater or James the Less or Andrew. We always have at least one Peter emulating his good behavior and very rarely his human weaknesses, but always Peter.

As to mere lawyers in a feeding frenzy, we need not fear them any more than we needed to fear Stalin, Hitler, Nero, Caligula, Diocletian or others far more capable and dangerous than mere lawyers or judges or their transitory nations, for that matter. We can see both the forest and the trees.

61 posted on 05/14/2002 5:49:37 AM PDT by BlackElk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Siobhan
Every time I see the enemies of the Church (internal or external) rising up I always think of the dream of St. John Bosco "The two columns in the sea"

The two columns were the Eucharist and the Blessed Virgin. St. John Bosco said of the two columns: 'the two columns of salvation seem to be devotion to Mary Most Holy and to the Blessed Sacrament of the Eucharist' & "The most serious trials for the Church are near at hand. That which has been so far is almost nothing in the face of that which must befall. Her enemies are represented by the ships that tried to sink the principal ship if they could. Only two means are left to save her amidst so much confusion: DEVOTION TO MARY MOST HOLY and FREQUENT COMMUNION, making use of every means and doing our best to practice them and having them practiced everywhere and by everybody."

Mary, Queen of all saints, pray for us.

62 posted on 05/14/2002 5:54:37 AM PDT by Cap'n Crunch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReveBM
Glad to hear that the Fundamentalist Christians don't think we faithful Catholics are evil. I always suspected that it was only a few individuals, just like there are a few individual Catholics who think Fundamentalist Christians are nuts. I definitly do not have that view point, we are all Brothers and Sisters in Christ if we have accepted Him as savior, the rest is just details. Orthodox Catholic signing off. God Bless
63 posted on 05/14/2002 7:12:21 AM PDT by StAthanasiustheGreat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: NWU Army ROTC
The only NC s I would invite would be the Anglican bishops of Nigeria. I think they would be more comfortable in Rome than with such people as Sprong.
64 posted on 05/14/2002 7:13:09 AM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lael
"It will be a Miracle if the US Catholic Church survives in its presant form...and if the Lawyers can somehow "pierce the Veil" and hook up Vatican activity in the liability, WATCH OUT!!"

I'm not sure that what passes for the Church in America SHOULD survive in its present form. It would perhaps be a mercy should it be put out of its misery. It can't be resurrected if it doesn't die.

Please do not misunderstand the above statement. Many good and faithful Catholics attend Mass in beautiful traditional churches and have wonderful pastors who teach and preach from the pulpit and live out their lives in holiness and sacrifice. These, in my opinion, are NOT AMERICAN Catholic churches. They are Roman.

65 posted on 05/14/2002 7:39:42 AM PDT by redhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Siobhan
T'ain't gonna happen. The minute the Church cowtows to the whims of poplar opinion is the moment the Church ceases to exist.
66 posted on 05/14/2002 7:48:38 AM PDT by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Siobhan
The smoke will enter from within.The evil is blatent with the liberal destuction agenda. The evil is rampant. We know who wins in the end. Keep the faith.
67 posted on 05/14/2002 8:30:57 AM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cap'n Crunch
I even dreamt about the vision of St. John Bosco last night. When I awoke this morning I was full of hope for the Church. Devotion to Our Lord in the Eucharist and to our Blessed Lady -- that is what we need to enkindle in each Catholic heart, each truly Catholic heart.

Mary, Queen of All Saints, pray for us.

68 posted on 05/14/2002 8:53:34 AM PDT by Siobhan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: tellw
I visited two Episcopal churches in Washington, D.C. to attend the baptisms of friends' children. One was called St. Paul's on K Street and the other was Ascension and St. Agnes. I felt very much at home in the deep reverence, the chants, the incense, bells, and homilies that were actually about what Baptism really means. I will always be grateful for those experiences, but how I wish those two parishes were Roman Catholic. They need to get out of their leftist/womynist diocese. And we sure could use their deep reverence for Our Lord and Our Blessed Lady.
69 posted on 05/14/2002 9:03:43 AM PDT by Siobhan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Lael, BlackElk, redhead
If you haven't yet read this BusinessWeek article, it's quite good: The Economic Strain on the Church
70 posted on 05/14/2002 9:11:28 AM PDT by COBOL2Java
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
...to whom the term fundamentalist is generally applied are the people who are in agreement with Pascendi Domenici Gregis, the great encyclical of Pope St. Pius X, and its companion piece Lamentabili Sane, on his stated dogma that the Bible is cover-to-cover, word-for-word, the inerrant Word of God.

FYI, here are their texts:


71 posted on 05/14/2002 9:21:39 AM PDT by COBOL2Java
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Siobhan
Man, what are these over-imagitnative idiots smoking?
72 posted on 05/14/2002 9:25:40 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
I hadn't thought of that verse before. Is your suggested context the only way that verse can be interpreted, or is there another possible explanation?
73 posted on 05/14/2002 9:44:52 AM PDT by ReveBM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: tellw
Try to find a Traditional Latin (or Tridentine) Mass somewhere near you. It might be worth your while. It has been for me, and I was born and raised after the changes of Vatican II!
74 posted on 05/14/2002 9:44:56 AM PDT by GenXFreedomFighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: yendu bwam
We must search for a coherent and persuasive moral stance on sexual morality: marriage and its support systems, family planning, reconciliation after divorce, homosexual activity, natural law

We covered almost all these topics in our Catholics Can Come Home series of six classes that is ending next week.

We have people dealing with the marriage and annulment issues and returing to the church. The book Catholics Can Come Home Again is by Carrie Kemp.

75 posted on 05/14/2002 10:10:20 AM PDT by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Siobhan
The Catholic church is still growing and learning from Vatican II -- which brought the Catholic Church into the modern times. We do not need a Vatican III.
76 posted on 05/14/2002 10:12:35 AM PDT by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Goldhammer
Particularly disturbing is the huge formless figure of christ, which takes away from the reality that Christ was a real person on a real cross.

It's what I would call a caricature.

77 posted on 05/14/2002 10:27:52 AM PDT by BlessedBeGod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod
I would call it an abomination.
78 posted on 05/14/2002 10:34:24 AM PDT by Siobhan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Siobhan
I would call it an abomination.

That, too.

It's amazing what some think passes as "reverent," ecclesial "art."

79 posted on 05/14/2002 10:35:31 AM PDT by BlessedBeGod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Siobhan
Vatican III? Ha, ha! That's a good one. I haven't heard such a bad idea since some liberal crypto-commie floated the idea of a new "Constitutional Convention."

I will only favor a new Church council AFTER all the liberals, marxists, pedophiles, homosexuals, modernists, masons, and atheists are expunged from the hierarchy.
80 posted on 05/14/2002 10:39:25 AM PDT by Antoninus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson