Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberals Planning for Vatican III
"Crisis Magazine" via Catholicity.com ^ | May 13, 2002 | Deal Hudson

Posted on 05/13/2002 6:27:38 PM PDT by Siobhan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: ReveBM
And there you have it. It was rude, unchristian and uncatholic for Sinkspur to paint our seperated bretheren with such a wide and bigoted brush.

Ignore his comments, my friend. He doesn't appear to be one of us. Peace be with you.
41 posted on 05/13/2002 8:39:13 PM PDT by Thundergod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: yendu bwam
I want the church to have God's guidelines

How true, we must get back to the basics. One would hope to see the Ten Commandments once again posted in our schools and public buildings. Not merely to hang as a decoration but to be firmly adhered to by one and all.

42 posted on 05/13/2002 8:41:04 PM PDT by ejo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ReveBM
Of course, our doctrine states that the true membership of the church is invisible and known only to God, and we expect it includes members of many denominations including many Catholics.

Most Protestants believe that the 'church' referred to by Jesus meant the body of true Christian believers worldwide. For Protestants, that includes Catholics. Protestants and Catholics have far more in common than not.

43 posted on 05/13/2002 8:53:52 PM PDT by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
What is orthodox about the fundamentalist view of Scripture is that the genuine Roman Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, National Organization of Episcopalians for Life, Westminster Presbyterians, Missouri Synod Lutherans, Wisconsin Synod Lutherans, Good News Methodists, majority wing of the Southern Baptist Conference, Assemblies of God, and the non-denominational Evangelical and Pentecostals to whom the term fundamentalist is generally applied are the people who are in agreement with Pascendi Domenici Gregis, the great encyclical of Pope St. Pius X, and its companion piece Lamentabili Sane, on his stated dogma that the Bible is cover-to-cover, word-for-word, the inerrant Word of God. Who would say otherwise, let him be declared anathema.

The fundamentalists are the folks who fight the good fight against secular humanism which Pope St. Pius X called modernism or the Modernist Heresy or the synthesis of all heresies. They are a substantial part of the bedrock of our American community, our brothers and sisters in Christ, our fellow Christians, who, despite some doctrinal differences arising from good faith disagreement with us over the meaning of Scripture have joined with us on about 85% of doctrine nonetheless.

Those fundamentalists are the ones, including genuine Catholics, who reject the notion that support of welfare state politics is as important, somehow, as the fight against abortion, homosexuality, wanton levels of divorce and an obsessively materialistic society. They also tend to be the ones who welcome our fellow human beings, fellow Christians and fellow children of God from south of our border. They are the ones who understand that the standard has never changed and that homosexuality is an abomination not to be engaged in by any Christians much less by those who act as priests or ministers of Jesus Christ whether with "consenting adults", teenage children or prepubescent children.

They are our sisters and brothers, despised by the world as our Savior promised us we would be. These are a few of the things that make them genuinely orthodox as opposed to trend of the week Amchurch "Catholicism" and its counterparts in the similarly decaying and dying "mainline" churches. They are the people who understand with the late great Baptist Reverend Mr. Criswell of Dallas: "A church starts to die when its throat is grasped by the palsied hand of liberalism." God bless them, each and every one.

44 posted on 05/13/2002 9:19:39 PM PDT by BlackElk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Siobhan
As for me and my house, we choose His Holiness, Jesus Christ!
45 posted on 05/13/2002 9:20:19 PM PDT by pro-life
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Don't forget the soon to be retired Mad Monk of Milwaukee, Archbishop Rembert Weakland who did a lot worse to the once Catholic cathedral in Milwaukee than the the recently departed nutcases who just left the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem. Their messes and desecrations can be cleaned up with soap and disinfectant. Weakland has left such a wreckovated desecrated disaster that only a bulldozer followed by the original blueprints from the 19th century will do.
46 posted on 05/13/2002 9:26:09 PM PDT by BlackElk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: NWU Army ROTC
From a former Episcopalian now Roman Catholic, no apology required....
47 posted on 05/13/2002 9:31:32 PM PDT by sailor4321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Siobhan
Dream on, NCR! Pope John Paul has personally appointed the vast majority of the men currently serving on the Council of Cardinals, and he didn't exactly pick a bunch of bleeding-hearts. The next pope will be just as conservative as JPII is.
48 posted on 05/13/2002 9:36:11 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pro-life
Amen!
49 posted on 05/13/2002 9:47:29 PM PDT by mustapha mond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
I was raised fundamentalist and I've never heard that characterization.
50 posted on 05/13/2002 9:55:41 PM PDT by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #51 Removed by Moderator

To: BlackElk
the Bible is cover-to-cover, word-for-word, the inerrant Word of God.

No disagreement there, certainly, except to add Pius XII's support for historical criticism in the study of Scripture.

Inerrancy doesn't require a literal interpretation.

52 posted on 05/13/2002 10:01:48 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Timesink; ALL
The next pope will be just as conservative as JPII is.

Won't matter...say JPII hangs around for two, three more years. The next Pope will have to convene a Council just to deal with the financial destruction of the present Crisis.

Anyone who thinks this isn't the tip of the Iceberg is deluding themselves. Do the Cash Flow projections...Dallas alone has had to remortgage Church property just to pay the settlements and Judgements through the end of...are you ready for this...year 2000!

The you-know-what hit the fan in January of 2002. In reality, the Church sealed its fate by "doubling down" its risks...by ordaining HUGE numbers of Homosexual priests.

In the "old" days, the Heteros understood the rule that if you are gonna cop a little, you do it AWAY from where you are a priest. Vacations were routinely used for activities allowed Eastern Rite (but NOT in the US since 1927) priests.

The NAMBLA types just couldn't keep their hands off.

Lawyers I've spoken to say we are looking at Asbestos and Breast Implants COMBINED!!

It will be a Miracle if the US Catholic Church survives in its presant form...and if the Lawyers can somehow "pierce the Veil" and hook up Vatican activity in the liability, WATCH OUT!!

53 posted on 05/13/2002 10:07:24 PM PDT by Lael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Siobhan
I read somewhere (back in the 70s?) that when Vatican II convened, the leftwing activists had their act together and came prepared -- that they pushed through much of their agenda while the majority of bishops were still finding their seats and getting used to the Latin.
54 posted on 05/14/2002 3:43:47 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Siobhan
Many dioceses in America are already in open schism on many issues, why NOT try to make it official?
55 posted on 05/14/2002 4:16:22 AM PDT by Petronski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dutch Boy
This must be what the writers of the bible cautioned about at the end of both the old and new testaments.

The New Testament wasn't canonized until 350 years after John wrote the book of Revelation. So when he states that,

"I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: If anyone adds anything to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book. And if anyone takes words away from this book of prophecy, God will take away from him his share in the tree of life and in the holy city, which are described in this book."

he is speaking of the book of Revelation –the book he was writing.

The New Testament canon that you use is the canon that was determined by several Church Councils in the late 300s. The Old Testament canon that you use was supposedly determined by a group of rabbis meeting in Jamnia around the year 100 –the same group of rabbis that rejected the New Testament altogether.

56 posted on 05/14/2002 4:21:34 AM PDT by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ReveBM
our doctrine states that the true membership of the church is invisible and known only to God,

How do you reconcile the invisibility of Christ's Church with the following passage:

Matthew 18:17

If he refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church; and if he refuses to listen even to the church, treat him as you would a pagan or a tax collector.


57 posted on 05/14/2002 4:49:43 AM PDT by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Goldhammer
"My personal fav was the idiot who suggested that people of all religions should vote to decide matters for Catholics in "Vatican III"."

That idiot sounds like the UN spokesperson.
58 posted on 05/14/2002 5:32:45 AM PDT by Domestic Church
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
"The NCR people are not to be taken seriously,"

The danger with NCR is that folks who don't know their faith and who haven't read the CCC will take what they say as reality...the NCR is a propaganda tool of the left and they are trying to shift the "norm"in that direction. Many would read it and not recognize the slant. We need Bishops and Cardinals who will lower the boom on this bunch.
59 posted on 05/14/2002 5:38:30 AM PDT by Domestic Church
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: yendu bwam
what the moral relativists want desperately is to have any act they commit affirmed by a church.

Exactly.

60 posted on 05/14/2002 5:48:50 AM PDT by Steve0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson