Let that sink in. A USSC justice believes in protected classes..
The Pervert Supremacists will not be pleased.
Very significant ruling. It would have been disastrous if it had gone the other way.
she insisted on reading her dissent from the Bench.
This is not shocking. Activists rule the court from the bottom right up to the top. Thankfully , for now, the power is with the constitution at the very top.
But, but, spineless chief justice roberts claims no political bias in judges.
I bet there’s a lot of people that Sotomayor would refuse to serve if she had a normal job. She has strong personal biases. Just saying.
Now can we talk about repealing 19? Which part of the Constitution creates “protected classes of people”?
I thought cases like this had already been resolved when the “bake the cake” Nazis lost.
Why do we keep doing this?
“USSC justice believes in protected classes”
Well yeah, that’s how SHE got where she is so in her mind it’s perfectly acceptable.
Also, just like the bakery case, this was never about some stupid gay web site, it was a legal attack to try to force Christians to abandon their Faith beliefs.
Discrimination against the baker’s forced pro-gay speech but no discrimination against the gay. If the gay had requested a website for, say, selling used furniture, the request would have to be granted.
Did the homo ask for a marble rye and a napoleon? Did they refuse to give zer a marble rye? A napoleon? Or did zer demand a gay wedding cake? Sotomayer has lost any pretense of judicial temperment.
It was decided on “free speech” grounds. It seems to me the Supreme Court should have also applied the 13th Amendment: “Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.”
Requiring someone to perform a service she/he does not wish to perform is involuntary servitude or modern day government mandated slavery.
I guess Hollywood won’t be forced to make movies about happy families.
And now, the counter suit
If there must be queers, let them be very poor queers
What a way to wrap up June.
Bttt!
“grants a business open to the public a constitutional right to refuse to serve members of a protected class.”
Now, do that with the unmasked pandemic defiers.