Posted on 12/08/2020 5:59:53 PM PST by BlackFemaleArmyColonel
SCOTUS GIVES GA, MI, WI, AND PA UNTIL THURSDAY DEC 10 AT 3PM TO RESPOND TO SUIT BROUGHT BY TEXAS.
(Excerpt) Read more at mobile.twitter.com ...
Could be
The TP aisle at my local WM is stripped again - some times, there’s nothing there at all. Except empty shelves.
It will still somewhat normal, 4-6 weeks ago.
He wouldn’t have 270 EV so he couldn’t win.
Why is Twitter the information source on this?
********
Other sources....
The complete filing with SCOTUS from Texas.
https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/images/admin/2020/Press/SCOTUSFiling.pdf
Other articles
https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-election-lawsuit-texas/texas-asks-us-supreme-court-to-help-trump-upend-election-idUSKBN28I27I
https://www.texastribune.org/2020/12/08/texas-ken-paxton-election-georgia/
Thats what I believe will happen.
Applause! I think the docket reading is being done by inexperienced legal readers. For instance, I don’t think this latest twitter news flash means the Supremes actually said “Alright, Pensylvania, ya morons, you have to respond by the 10th.”
What I think it actually means is Texas wanted the Supremes to know that they asked PA to respond to the motion and said “Hey Pensy, we’re gonna want your response to this by Thursday, because the Big Guys are gonna want to know how you’ll respond. We mean, heck, you could be so tired of being the laughingstock, scourge of the US that you just *might* say “Hey, America, we’re sorry. We are going to invalidate all our electors, sit out the elction, and spend the next 4 years cleaning up our mess!”
I doubt they are prepared to reset the election themselves, so they might very well decide to kick it back to the state houses.
Or, if they've broken into the Red Bull, they could say that there is sufficient evidence of illegalities and fraud in the conduct of the elections, all designed to benefit one party, and therefore order the count as of midnight on election day to be the determining count. Hard to say.
Remember too that Alito's order to PA was ignored, and Thomas an Kavanaugh have good reasons to bear a grudge against the Democrats.
> Not a constitutional lawyer, but they will probably not argue against fraud, rather that Texas has no standing or right ro question another State’s election procedures.
In short, states’ rights(?)
Tick...tick...tick....⏰
3 votes down? try 4, do not count on the Dread Traitor Roberts to do anything resembling the correct thing.
Thank you for all the links.
The states need to submit their responses (briefs) ala PA did today basically stating, “yes we cheated and we cheated so big there’s nothing that can be done about it. suck rocks”
bookmark
It’s TRUMP or nothing...
...TRUMP is the last great wall protecting FREEDOM
Steven W. wrote:
“The states need to submit their responses (briefs) ala PA did today basically stating, “yes we cheated and we cheated so big there’s nothing that can be done about it. suck rocks””
Didn’t PA also say they were afraid of violence if they agreed with Alito?
That’s the lone PA case, right?
Thanks!
You said it. I figure the US Supreme Court will void the certifications and tell the States redo the elections before December 14, 2020 without changing election laws that were approved by the state legislatures. If the states can’t, the Supreme Court could give them the option for the state legislature to choose the electors themselves or forfeit the votes in the electoral college.
If SCOTUS throw out the electors from those states, then neither candidate gets to 270 and the outcome goes to the House to select the President. In that scenario, each state gets 1 vote (regardless of the number of congress members from each state). Since Republicans hold a majority of state delegations, it is likely Trump would win.
I am of the opinion that the Justices declined to here the Pennsylvania case because the Texas case will resolve the issue of who won the Presidency without have to address the massive fraud.
All they have to do is rule that invalid votes must be rejected because they weren’t submitted in compliance with the law and/or send it to the state legislatures to decide. Either way, Trump wins.
I also think the Democrat threat to pack the Court is on the minds of at least the six Justices who agreed to hear the case. They like their little club the way it is.
You are wrong.
The SCOTUS will not slit its own throat. They will not destroy themselves.
Roberts’ “job”, at this point, is going to be to side with the majority, so that he can write watered-down decisions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.