Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: SCOTUS GIVES GA, MI, WI, AND PA UNTIL THURSDAY DEC 10 AT 3PM TO RESPOND TO SUIT BROUGHT BY TEXAS
Twitter ^ | 8 Dec 20 | Anonymous Patriot

Posted on 12/08/2020 5:59:53 PM PST by BlackFemaleArmyColonel

SCOTUS GIVES GA, MI, WI, AND PA UNTIL THURSDAY DEC 10 AT 3PM TO RESPOND TO SUIT BROUGHT BY TEXAS.

(Excerpt) Read more at mobile.twitter.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: braking; scotustexas; twitter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-314 next last

I picked the wrong day to stop sniffin’ glue.....


21 posted on 12/08/2020 6:09:49 PM PST by RandallFlagg (Some men just want to watch the world burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HandBasketHell

” The states must justify why their unconstitutional cheat-by-mail-in ballots that were not passed through their respective legislatures did not disenfranchise the states like Texas, et al. where voters did everything according to the Constitution”

Oh geez... good luck with that!!!


22 posted on 12/08/2020 6:10:18 PM PST by ObozoMustGo2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

So is this where we bring all our evidence.


23 posted on 12/08/2020 6:11:10 PM PST by glimmerman70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SecondAmendment

They asked for a response from PA BEFORE the Texas suit was filed. Looks like after reading the Texas suit they decided to go ahead and deny hearing the PA suit in favor of hearing the Texas suit that incorporates the same issues, only includes more states.


24 posted on 12/08/2020 6:12:20 PM PST by Saveourcountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Gahanna Bob

There is also the fact that no matter the circumstance, there is a process that States are required to follow in order to change election procedures in your State. They had plenty of time to do this but it wasn’t done.


25 posted on 12/08/2020 6:12:25 PM PST by onevoter ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

What can these states, led by RINOs or Dims, employing corrupt morons for secretaries of state and ballot workers, say to the SC when the massive amount of evidence piling up is presented? “Hummidda, hummidda, hummidda,” comes to mind.


26 posted on 12/08/2020 6:12:44 PM PST by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phillyred; MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

I think it’s gonna be mene, mene, tekel, upharsin.

But I’m a bit pessimistic these days.

Which is why I prep. Have for years. To a small degree, anyways.


27 posted on 12/08/2020 6:13:53 PM PST by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Phillyred; MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

I think it’s gonna be mene, mene, tekel, upharsin.

But I’m a bit pessimistic these days.

Which is why I prep. Have for years. To a small degree, anyways.


28 posted on 12/08/2020 6:13:53 PM PST by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris

Did they not chill your rose?


29 posted on 12/08/2020 6:15:23 PM PST by Boardwalk (Lets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

Not an expert on this but my gut is telling me this allows for SCOTUS to have a big impact with very little election interference as they see it.

They can affirm the unconstitutionality of the election in these states and leave it to these same states to provide a constitutionally consistent slate of electors or none at all.

They would need only to rule once and then all other suits could done at a later date.


30 posted on 12/08/2020 6:15:37 PM PST by MagillaX (My)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glimmerman70

Yes.


31 posted on 12/08/2020 6:16:58 PM PST by BlackFemaleArmyColonel (No weapon formed against me shall prosper! (Isaiah 54:17))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris
Which is why I prep.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Care to share? lol

32 posted on 12/08/2020 6:17:29 PM PST by pollywog (" O thou who changest not....ABIDE with me")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Democrats hate too much

“ Anything those states say will be insulting the intelligence of the Supreme Court Justices.”

true. so i hope the states lie to the SC. Just like how PA ignored Alito’s order to set aside late ballots


33 posted on 12/08/2020 6:18:09 PM PST by CottonBall (COVID -1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lockbar

> This is for all the big Tuna and all the marbles. <

Right you are. Now, if the Supreme Court follows the Constitution they will nullify all of those fraudulent state results. But if they don’t want to upset the apple cart, they will let things be.

I’m a betting man. And I bet according to how things are, and not as I wish things to be. So I’m gonna bet that the Supreme Court will take the easy way out. Joe Biden will be inaugurated in January.

For the sake of the Republic, I hope I’m wrong.


34 posted on 12/08/2020 6:18:54 PM PST by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

Any one wondering why Kemp is fight us?
https://populist.press/kemp-linked-directly-to-chinese-spy-operation-that-trump-shutdown/


35 posted on 12/08/2020 6:18:56 PM PST by ronnie raygun ( Massive mistakes are made by arrogant fools; massive evils are committed by evil people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hankbrown

Been trying all day to tell people that all of this is just common procedure and that it means nothing as far as what the Court will actually do. Everything that comes to the Court gets docketed, asking for a response is pretty standard, etc. But people are falling for twitter nonsense. Shame.


36 posted on 12/08/2020 6:19:00 PM PST by Stravinsky (Politeness will not defeat the Marxist revolutionaries)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MagillaX

Exactly.


37 posted on 12/08/2020 6:19:20 PM PST by BlackFemaleArmyColonel (No weapon formed against me shall prosper! (Isaiah 54:17))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
Why is Twitter the information source on this?

Because the MSM is deliberately ignoring.

Do we let them get away with the steal? I think not!


38 posted on 12/08/2020 6:20:03 PM PST by SamAdams76 (Orange Man GOOD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Boardwalk

heh


39 posted on 12/08/2020 6:20:37 PM PST by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Boardwalk

heh


40 posted on 12/08/2020 6:20:37 PM PST by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-314 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson