Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: SCOTUS GIVES GA, MI, WI, AND PA UNTIL THURSDAY DEC 10 AT 3PM TO RESPOND TO SUIT BROUGHT BY TEXAS
Twitter ^ | 8 Dec 20 | Anonymous Patriot

Posted on 12/08/2020 5:59:53 PM PST by BlackFemaleArmyColonel

SCOTUS GIVES GA, MI, WI, AND PA UNTIL THURSDAY DEC 10 AT 3PM TO RESPOND TO SUIT BROUGHT BY TEXAS.

(Excerpt) Read more at mobile.twitter.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: braking; scotustexas; twitter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-314 next last
To: ronnie raygun

He’s a sell out.


41 posted on 12/08/2020 6:20:51 PM PST by BlackFemaleArmyColonel (No weapon formed against me shall prosper! (Isaiah 54:17))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SecondAmendment

It turns out that the PA lawsuit is not dead. SC just refused the emergency injunction or something like that.


42 posted on 12/08/2020 6:21:26 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Trump Girl Kit Cat; SecondAmendment

Plus the SC only denied the request to stop certification of Pennsylvania’s vote, the case is still active


43 posted on 12/08/2020 6:21:45 PM PST by CottonBall (COVID -1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

To: rxsid; RummyChick
This lawsuit is based on violations of the Eual Protection Clause. The issue of standing will arise. Not mentioned in the complaint is the Guarantee Clause, also known as, the Republican Form of Government Clause, Article IV, Section 4:

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

Do note that that clause makes no limitation to a specific branch of government, meaning each branch has a responsibility to enforce it if a republican form of government is not present. Some of the lawsuits filed in the lower courts made reference to this clause, which was ignored. Personally, I think it is a better argument than the Equal Protection Clause argument for states to have standing to challenge the electors of another state.
316 posted on 12/8/2020, 9:14:09 PM by Dr. Franklin (”A republic, if you can keep it.”)


44 posted on 12/08/2020 6:21:53 PM PST by RummyChick (I blame Kushner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pollywog

Food / ammo. Just a few basics.

Still, watching rioters wreak havoc and next to nothing is done to them. With exceptions here and there.

I would never have believed it except in the most liberal cities. Which will all wake up far too late.


45 posted on 12/08/2020 6:23:17 PM PST by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

Has this been verified? I could not find it on the SCOTUS site.


46 posted on 12/08/2020 6:23:26 PM PST by isthisnickcool (1218 - NEVER FORGET!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Saveourcountry

Your all need to read this tweet.

https://mobile.twitter.com/JennaEllisEsq/status/1336451735150350336


47 posted on 12/08/2020 6:23:27 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Gahanna Bob
They will blame changes made for the election was because of the pandemic and risk to public health. That’s about all they got and it won’t fly.

Anyone concerned with covid safety during the election could ask the state legislature to change the rules to make it safer. If the state legislature says no, then they say no.

Conversely we could ask the court that if it is not up to the state legislature to make the determination because of "COVID" then why not have it up to Trump to cancel the election because of "COVID"! Why not dissolve the Supreme Court because of "COVID!" and forget the rest of the rule of law because of "COVID!".?

48 posted on 12/08/2020 6:23:35 PM PST by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ObozoMustGo2012

“What does this mean “respond to”??”

They file their response to Texas’ suit with the court.


49 posted on 12/08/2020 6:23:37 PM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ObozoMustGo2012
What does this mean “respond to”??

Texas has not filed a lawsuit before the Supreme Court; they are not allowed to, under Supreme Court rules. What they filed is a motion asking for permission to file a lawsuit. The Court has set a deadline for the defendant states to respond to that motion.

50 posted on 12/08/2020 6:24:28 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Revel

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/end-case-trump-attorney-jordan-sekulow-mi-ga-pa-wi-required-respond-texas-case-thursday-good-news-video/


51 posted on 12/08/2020 6:24:45 PM PST by conservativepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

I hope the libtards writing my states position phuck up terribly, they are going to be the absolute lamest arguments anyways

I want every single democrat in my state to go to hell, especially the active fraudsters

If they dont have a chance at changing their ways, i hope they all rot in hell


52 posted on 12/08/2020 6:26:30 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saveourcountry

I think the US Supreme Court want to deal with the issue of changing election laws without the approval of the state legislatures in one case, not having to deal with each state on separate cases. It saves the Supreme Court time.


53 posted on 12/08/2020 6:26:30 PM PST by convoter2016
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Trump Girl Kit Cat

I hope!


54 posted on 12/08/2020 6:26:32 PM PST by CondoleezzaProtege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Democrats hate too much

Not a constitutional lawyer, but they will probably not argue against fraud, rather that Texas has no standing or right ro question another State’s election procedures.


55 posted on 12/08/2020 6:27:05 PM PST by Chaguito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool

Yes, it’s there. I visited the actual site earlier. Sorry I don’t have that exact link now, but I did go there to verify.


56 posted on 12/08/2020 6:27:38 PM PST by Golden Eagle (********** MERRY CHRISTMAS ***********)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: All

At what point does the moniker “president elect joe biden” become recognized as a claim that is disputed??


57 posted on 12/08/2020 6:27:55 PM PST by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

I am not a lawyer either but this case case encompasses almost all of the cases that have been going forward.

I am hopeful.


58 posted on 12/08/2020 6:28:10 PM PST by funfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gahanna Bob

You know, you never hear about it. But, they did a study after a primary in Wisconsin, the results of which were that there was no spread of the virus as a result of in-person voting. Thus, there was no basis for any pretext for mail-in voting because of the pandemic.


59 posted on 12/08/2020 6:28:41 PM PST by MrChips ("To wisdom belongs the apprehension of eternal things." - St. Augustine I don’t think we need one,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Fai Mao; All
"...if this fails the next step is to say,”If one part of the constitution is voided then the whole document is void. Therefore, we are no longer part of this association of states."

"On the face of it", (prima facie), there is no true question you are right.

If this "ajoined suit" were to fail, then the self defined "Contract" (US Constitution) is by void, as the agregiously fraudulent, treasonous, global socialist left wing DNC/AFLCIO/CHINA/UNIPARTY dominated states, have committed massive voter fraud, horrifically stolen and disenfranchised their own electorate's likely super majorities, and have proactively chosen to by globally treasonous FRAUD - to subordinate the entire nation to their treasonous fraud an d domination.

60 posted on 12/08/2020 6:29:36 PM PST by patriotfury ((May the fleas of a thousand camels occupy mo' ham mads tents!) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-314 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson