Skip to comments.
Payback: Democrats rig Tulsi Gabbard right out of their next debate
American Thinker ^
| August 22, 2019
| Monica Showalter
Posted on 08/22/2019 5:43:54 PM PDT by george76
Iconoclastic Rep. Tulsi Gabbard did the unforgiveable in the eyes of the hidebound Democratic Party establishment: She knocked down one their favorites, Kamala Harris.
...
Now, through the miracle of rule-rigging, the Democratic establishment has maneuvered to exact a price from her: No appearance at the next Democratic debate. No more taking down the next favorite.
...
Isn't Julian Castro polling around something like zero? Maybe he's there for affirmative action purposes, alongside his lockstep extremism.
Two, Google seems to have already done a number on Gabbard, taking down her paid-for campaign ads during the first debate when Internet viewers' interest in her spiked to the highest levels of all the campaign. Google, most of the reporting has neglected to note, is brimming with former Obama administration operatives. Democrats, the pillars, the money, the establishment. Might that suggest some sort of fix in for Gabbard as well? It's pretty obvious something is going on.
...
Right after Tulsi finished the second debate, Kamala Harris really did utterly tumble in the polls. Democratic voters, now aware of her incredibly corrupt record as a prosecutor - endorsing false testimony, keeping people in jail beyond their terms, throwing the impoverished in prison for marijuana crimes while admitting she enjoyed the weed herself -- are avoiding her now like a bad smell. Harris is damaged goods now, and she won't recover
...
Democrats are still the same old Democrats, and up to their old rigging tricks, putting their thumbs down on the scale for the candidates they prefer. They've done it before, against Bernie Sanders, and now they are doing it again to avenge Harris.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: california; crimes; democrats; gabbard; google; harris; hawaii; india; jamaica; kamala; kamalaharris; marijuana; naturalborn; tulsigabbard
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
To: NFHale; fieldmarshaldj; DarthVader; Impy; BillyBoy; LS
Exactly. Why is this DEMOCRAT even being discussed? This DEMOCRAT doesnt HAVE to be a DEMOCRAT. She CHOSE her party affiliation.
It just goes to show that because shes decent looking, she gets a kitty pass from the weak minded.
61
posted on
08/24/2019 3:48:52 AM PDT
by
GOPsterinMA
(I'm with Steve McQueen: I live my life for myself and answer to nobody.)
To: GOPsterinMA; fieldmarshaldj; DarthVader; Impy; BillyBoy; LS
She’s there to provide “normalcy”.
“Oh, look... HERE’S a “moderate” democrat we can get behind!!!”
Same with ol’ White Bread Biden. Just there to fool the white democrats that still hanging on into voting for him; then as soon as they get elected it’s back to bashing “the white man”.
She’s one of them. She’s their new version of “The War Hero”... except the completely psychotic wing ain’t having it.
62
posted on
08/24/2019 6:52:44 AM PDT
by
NFHale
(The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
To: NFHale; fieldmarshaldj
Glad she didn't get hired by Trump, it could easily have been a disaster.
63
posted on
08/24/2019 7:22:39 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
To: SunkenCiv; fieldmarshaldj
“...t could easily have been a disaster....”
It WOULD have been a disaster. She’s one of THEM, and still is by her own choice.
Even if she jumped ship and came over the right side of things, she’s still a lib.
We have Country to repair.
64
posted on
08/24/2019 7:27:32 AM PDT
by
NFHale
(The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
To: NFHale
65
posted on
08/24/2019 9:53:43 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
- Gabbard Victimized by DNC's Dubious Debate Criteria [08/23/2019 11:27:40 AM PDT]
- Payback: Democrats rig Tulsi Gabbard right out of their next debate [08/22/2019 5:43:54 PM PDT]
- Why Tulsi Gabbard Was The Only Democrat Asked A Negative Question Last Night [06/27/2019 7:03:00 PM PDT]
- Rep. Tulsi Gabbard Banned From Democratic Debate [10/13/2015 10:40:58 AM PDT]
- Tulsi Gabbard Reports for Active Duty. Press Asks If She's Worried About 2020 Consequences. [08/14/2019 7:02:59 AM PDT]
- Rigged? Tulsi Gabbard Only Candidate Not Trending On Twitter [07/31/2019 8:32:01 PM PDT]
- Tulsi Gabbard's $50 Million Lawsuit Against Google Is Another Attack on Online Free Speech [07/27/2019 2:41:57 PM PDT]
- Tulsi Gabbard, Democratic Presidential Candidate, Sues Google for $50 Million [07/25/2019 7:04:05 PM PDT]
- Tulsi Gabbard Just Sued Google [07/25/2019 12:02:38 PM PDT]
- Tulsi Gabbard sues Google over censorship claims [07/25/2019 11:59:53 AM PDT]
- Tulsi Gabbard, Andrew Yang Buck Open Borders Lobby in Democrat Primary [08/15/2019 10:18:35 PM PDT]
- Rep. Tulsi Gabbard calls for complete overhaul of DNC following Clinton rigging revelations [11/03/2017 7:42:34 AM PDT]
- Tulsi Gabbard 'not surprised' by Donna Brazile's DNC bombshell, but 'surprised' it went public [11/02/2017 5:36:04 PM PDT]
- Tulsi Gabbard Shocks CNN: 'There Are No Moderate Rebels', Obama Admin Armed ISIS [01/27/2017 8:12:21 PM PST]
- Tulsi Gabbard Interview on CNN, 1/25/17 (Obama Armed ISIS) [01/27/2017 9:40:02 AM PST]
- DNC Vice Chair Tulsi Gabbard: Obama Working Hand in Hand With Islamic Extremists [11/18/2015 8:10:49 AM PST]
- Email warned (US Rep Tulsi) Gabbard of reprisal (bullied by clinton people for supporting Sanders) [10/14/2016 12:01:46 PM PDT]
- WIKILEAKS: Tulsi Gabbard Slammed for Supporting Bernie [10/10/2016 4:08:11 PM PDT]
- Here we go: Tulsi Gabbard moves to make a big change to the Democrats' primary process [06/12/2016 8:56:07 AM PDT]
- Tulsi Gabbard launches petition to end Democratic Party superdelegate process [06/11/2016 11:45:02 PM PDT]
- Tulsi Gabbard, Rising Democratic Star From Hawaii, Makes Mark on Party by Defying It [11/29/2015 5:16:33 PM PST]
- How you know Tulsi Gabbard really got under Kamala Harris' skin [08/20/2019 9:21:39 AM PDT]
- Poll: Kamala Harris Plummets to 1% with Black Democrats After Tulsi Gabbard Takedown [08/06/2019 6:49:11 PM PDT]
- Gabbard Torches MSNBC Host: It Sounds Like Kamala's Giving You Her Talking Points [08/03/2019 6:40:36 PM PDT]
- Tulsi Gabbard Calls Kamala Harris a Drug Warrior and Dirty Prosecutor. She's Right. [08/02/2019 2:00:29 PM PDT]
- Strange Alliances: Tulsi Gabbard Slams Kamala Harris' "False Accusation" Of Racism At Joe Biden [07/08/2019 7:01:59 PM PDT]
- Gabbard Claims Trump Incites Racism, Bigotry, and Violence [07/24/2019 7:56:45 AM PDT]
- Tulsi Gabbard: Trump 'Is Inciting Racism and Violence in Our Country' [07/22/2019 12:31:39 PM PDT]
- Gabbard: 'Offensive' to worry about number of generals in Trump's Cabinet [12/08/2016 3:30:50 PM PST]
- Tulsi Gabbard to Join Veterans at Standing Rock to Protest Dakota Access Pipeline [11/28/2016 8:02:49 PM PST]
- Democratic Rep. Tulsi Gabbard 'Under Serious Consideration' for Trump Cabinet [11/21/2016 2:32:38 PM PST]
- Donald Trump to meet with Bernie Sanders supporter Tulsi Gabbard [11/21/2016 8:45:10 AM PST]
- Will Trump Choose Tulsi Gabbard as Veep? (not a vanity...just heard on the interweb) [05/05/2016 3:56:49 PM PDT]
- Tulsi Gabbard Resigns from DNC to Back Bernie Sanders [02/28/2016 3:06:00 PM PST]
66
posted on
08/24/2019 9:54:54 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
To: SunkenCiv
All noted.
Like I said - She’s STILL a democrat, identifies with them, and is one of them.
Ergo, not to be trusted.
67
posted on
08/24/2019 9:58:28 AM PDT
by
NFHale
(The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
To: NFHale
68
posted on
08/24/2019 11:53:39 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
To: NFHale; GOPsterinMA; fieldmarshaldj; DarthVader; Impy; BillyBoy; LS
>>
Shes their new version of The War Hero... except the completely psychotic wing aint having it. <<
I would say EVERY RAT on stage aside from Tulsi counts as the "completely psychotic wing". She's pretty much the ONLY one who has accepted the Russians didn't "hack" the election, for example. Apparently having a rational person on stage didn't sit well with the rest of them.
If Joe Biden is a "moderate", then Osama bin Laden is Jewish.
69
posted on
08/24/2019 4:48:21 PM PDT
by
BillyBoy
(States rights is NOT a suicide pact)
To: BillyBoy; GOPsterinMA; fieldmarshaldj; DarthVader; Impy; LS
“...EVERY RAT on stage aside from Tulsi counts as the “completely psychotic wing...”
You got that right for sure, Billy.
They’re all insane commie jerkoffs at this point.
But again... SHE knows what they are, and yet still identifies as a Dem. Not to be trusted.
70
posted on
08/24/2019 8:24:50 PM PDT
by
NFHale
(The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
To: NFHale
Still, I hate to see the wackos push her out. She is a vet, and very proactive for Veterans Rights.
71
posted on
08/24/2019 8:28:16 PM PDT
by
miserare
( Indict Hillary!)
To: miserare
“”...hate to see the wackos push her out...”
Nobody is pushing her out. She hasn’t changed party affiliation, she’s voluntarily STILL a democrat. I judge folks by the company they keep.
The day she comes over to the side of the aisle that’s trying to REPAIR THE COUNTRY and undo the Obama damage, then maybe I’ll see her differently.
Until then... she’s one of them.
72
posted on
08/24/2019 8:37:09 PM PDT
by
NFHale
(The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
To: bramps
I find it bizarre as hell you think she would take votes from Trump.
73
posted on
08/25/2019 12:35:14 AM PDT
by
Impy
(I have no virtue to signal.)
To: NFHale; GOPsterinMA; fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy; LS; AuH2ORepublican; campaignPete R-CT; ...
I agree with GOPster, F this b, she’s the seed of a traitor to the GOP. On a couple things maybe she’s the most sensible of the lot, “Russia” and all that. But the far left !adores! her for several reasons and he voting record is garbage just like the rest.
Despite the bizarre fixation some on the right have with her, (because she doesn’t look like a half melted old shoe?) I’ve never heard her described as a “moderate”. I would call d-bag John Delaney the most “moderate”.
She seems to have kneecapped Kamala, so I thank her for that but she’s polling in the gutter and has a zero% chance of the rat nomination no matter how many master debates she’s in so BFD if she’s not in the next one.
Senile Biden, Sanders, Warren, or maybe fading Kamala will be the rat nominee, the rest may as well be side show freaks.
74
posted on
08/25/2019 12:36:06 AM PDT
by
Impy
(I have no virtue to signal.)
To: Impy
ACU ratings:
Tulsi Gabbard (HI) - 92% leftist (’18); 96% leftist (’17); lifetime - 92.64% leftist
John Delaney (MD) - 88% leftist (’18); 96% leftist (’17); lifetime - 92.59% leftist
So Delaney is 0.05% more to the “right” of Gabbard. Still hard-core far-left.
75
posted on
08/25/2019 3:11:39 AM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(Who will think of the gerbils ? Just say no to Buttgiggity !)
To: Impy
76
posted on
08/25/2019 4:45:09 AM PDT
by
GOPsterinMA
(I'm with Steve McQueen: I live my life for myself and answer to nobody.)
To: DesertRhino
We literally supplied them with TOW missiles and flew top cover for them in Syria. We switched positions on Al Qeida in Libya. Thats where the State, DOD, and CIA all started supporting black flag waving Al Qeida.Yep. The truth hurts here and the truth is that we shamefully and disgracefully supported the wrong side in Syria thinking that if we renamed them "Syrian Freedom Fighters" that nobody would notice.
77
posted on
08/25/2019 5:05:57 AM PDT
by
Drew68
To: Reno89519
they now avoid the debate that both of these two are not Natural Born Citizens.There is no significant debate taking place on the NBC status of Tulsi Gabbard or Kamala Harris.
78
posted on
08/25/2019 5:08:31 AM PDT
by
Drew68
To: Drew68
79
posted on
08/25/2019 5:08:39 AM PDT
by
bert
( (KE. NP. N.btyC. +12) Progressives are existential American enemies)
To: Impy
I find it bizarre as hell you think she would take votes from Trump.
*******************************************************
To be perfectly clear, she would take more votes from Trump than she would the dem candidate, if she ran as an independent.
The fact that you would phrase your response as you did (’bizarre as hell’) tells me responding is probably a waste of time but what the heck.
Hillary just about beat Trump. Any nut that voted for evil is voting for evil again. Meaning they are voting for the dem candidate again. Most of those who simply couldn't vote for Hillary probably voted for Trump or stayed home. Those are the votes we are concerned with. Trump was largely an unknown quantity when elected (as far as a candidate). The media has been working every minute to portray Trump in as bad a light as possible. To information and truth seeking voters like those on FR, the media is not changing our minds. But those other voters are vulnerable. Now here comes Gabbard. Attractive, very well spoken, and a military vet. She will look like a good alternative to those who buy into the media narrative about Trump but still want to vote. Please now tell me why that opinion is as bizarre as hell and why Gabbard running as independent would be a good thing for Trump.
80
posted on
08/25/2019 5:40:45 AM PDT
by
bramps
(It's the Islam stupid!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson