Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ohio’s electoral votes for president would go to national popular vote winner
cleveland.com ^ | April fools day | jeremy pelzer

Posted on 04/01/2019 9:50:19 PM PDT by entropy12

COLUMBUS, Ohio—A proposed Ohio constitutional amendment to award the state’s presidential electoral votes to the winner of the national popular vote has cleared an initial hurdle toward making the statewide ballot this November.

A summary of the proposed amendment was certified by Attorney General Dave Yost on Monday as a “fair and truthful statement of the proposed law,” though Yost didn’t weigh in on whether he supported or opposed the measure.

(Excerpt) Read more at cleveland.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections; US: Maryland; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: 0readpost63; 1moretime; clinton; college; constitution; daveyost; electoral; electoralcollege; electoralvotes; hillary; makingeveryvotecount; mikedewine; oh2020; ohio; readpost63; reedhundt; rxsid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last
California & NY & IL are not enough to kill the electoral college. Rats need to get Ohio & Florida to do the job.
1 posted on 04/01/2019 9:50:19 PM PDT by entropy12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: entropy12

How is this even legal?


2 posted on 04/01/2019 9:52:39 PM PDT by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

Ummm.. so Ohio voters dont get a vote???

They just gonna say “whatever every one else wants!”????


3 posted on 04/01/2019 9:53:08 PM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

It’s completely inconceivable to me how or why the people of a state would vote for this. I have zero understanding of how this has any appeal at all.


4 posted on 04/01/2019 9:53:09 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Apoplectic is where we want them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder
It’s completely inconceivable to me how or why the people of a state would vote for this

People are stupid, it's that simple.
5 posted on 04/01/2019 9:54:55 PM PDT by JoSixChip (Trump stands alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

The rats are busy gathering as many states with few electoral votes as well. I think this movement is a real threat, so many don’t understand the electoral college and believe their votes would count more with popular vote. People in small states like where I live in NM have no clue how the electoral college works FOR them.


6 posted on 04/01/2019 9:55:54 PM PDT by Tammy8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

this is unconstitutional....we’re a republic, not a democracy with mob rule..


7 posted on 04/01/2019 9:57:38 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

I’m wondering how this might help Trump, give him an even bigger landslide in 2020.


8 posted on 04/01/2019 10:00:01 PM PDT by Reno89519 (No Amnesty! No Catch-and-Release! Just Say No to All Illegal Aliens! Arrest & Deport!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

Have they even glanced at that thingy written some 200 plus years ago regarding how the president is elected? Cause I do believe there are some words which would put a spanner in their scheme.


9 posted on 04/01/2019 10:00:24 PM PDT by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

The theory is that it is legal because the states have a right to run their elections. I am not a lawyer so no idea but that was the talking point when our legislature was discussing it.


10 posted on 04/01/2019 10:00:34 PM PDT by Tammy8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

They’re voting on whether to disenfranchise themselves (and their children).


11 posted on 04/01/2019 10:00:44 PM PDT by rightwingcrazy (;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Safrguns

“you want California to cast Ohio’s votes?”

that should be the ad against this initiative - and it ought to kill it.


12 posted on 04/01/2019 10:00:57 PM PDT by rintintin (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cherry

Explain that to John Roberts and the rest of the libs on the SCOTUS.


13 posted on 04/01/2019 10:01:57 PM PDT by Equine1952 (Get yourself a ticket on a common mans train of thought)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

Why vote?


14 posted on 04/01/2019 10:02:52 PM PDT by o-n-money
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

An Ohio vote is virtually meaningless then.


15 posted on 04/01/2019 10:03:07 PM PDT by robel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

Kasich sucks until his lemgs explode.


16 posted on 04/01/2019 10:03:29 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tammy8

States can pass laws. They need ‘permission’ from Congress to enter into any compact or agreement between the states.


17 posted on 04/01/2019 10:03:35 PM PDT by Theoria (I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cherry

It’s not unconstitutional.

It is stupid.


18 posted on 04/01/2019 10:10:40 PM PDT by Mr.Unique (The government, by its very nature, cannot give except what it first takes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lastchance

Which words? Post them.


19 posted on 04/01/2019 10:11:24 PM PDT by Mr.Unique (The government, by its very nature, cannot give except what it first takes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

In other words - Ohio voters could very well have their electoral votes go to a candidate they did NOT choose... this is absurd.


20 posted on 04/01/2019 10:11:30 PM PDT by TheBattman (Democrats-Progressives-Marxists-Socialists - redundant labels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson