Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: entropy12

How is this even legal?


2 posted on 04/01/2019 9:52:39 PM PDT by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: conservative98

this is unconstitutional....we’re a republic, not a democracy with mob rule..


7 posted on 04/01/2019 9:57:38 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: conservative98

The theory is that it is legal because the states have a right to run their elections. I am not a lawyer so no idea but that was the talking point when our legislature was discussing it.


10 posted on 04/01/2019 10:00:34 PM PDT by Tammy8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: conservative98

It’s not legal. All it will take is a lawsuit by those who lose their votes due to the state not recognizing the popular vote winner in the state.


39 posted on 04/01/2019 10:46:56 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: conservative98

It isn’t. See the Interstste Compacts Clause, US Constitution. They aren’t even following a procedure that would allow for it to become legal


58 posted on 04/02/2019 12:55:34 AM PDT by faithhopecharity ( “Politicians are not born; they are excreted.” Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: conservative98

There would be nothing unconstitutional about it. They wouldnt be the first either.


63 posted on 04/02/2019 1:22:46 AM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: conservative98

The Constitution clearly states that electors are awarded in a manner determined by the legislatures of the several states. The legislature can simply name the electors themselves if it wishes.

There was actually talk in 2000, that if the Democrats didn’t stop their shenanigans in Florida, the state legislature would simply vote to install whatever electors they pleased.


71 posted on 04/02/2019 2:50:43 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Schumer delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: conservative98
Article II

Section 1. The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same Term, be elected, as follows
Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.

Notice that the governor of the state is not involved, the manner of selecting electors is wholly up to the legislature.
73 posted on 04/02/2019 2:58:02 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Schumer delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: conservative98
How is this even legal?

It's not. Won't pass Constitutional muster. This is just all part of the Demoncrat plan to ultimately change the Constitution via Constitutional Convention by ginning up popular support to gain the 2/3 state ratification necessary.

The Democrats are playing long ball here. They know incremental change on this one is the way to go and ultimately they'll probably get their way with people in this country being so f'n stupid that they don't realize they're ceding their votes to larger, more populated states.

Looking back, this is exactly why things like the Constitution aren't taught in schools anymore and the requirement we had (at least here in Illinois) to pass a Constitution Test were requirements to graduate in the 1970's. Not anymore!!

81 posted on 04/02/2019 4:20:47 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: conservative98

“How is this even legal?”

It isn’t. It’s a symbolic gesture meant to further raise the ire of liberal voters. Funny thing is, Republicans should do the same thing with the 83% of the counties they won in 2016. Just have the county heads say they will give their portion of the electoral vote to whoever wins the county.

Look at it this way. If California with their 58 counties has 24 counties that trump won, Trump should get 42% of the electoral vote. Out of 3007 counties, Trump won 88.09% of them. That means that Trump won 407 of the electoral votes.

Run that at the Democrats and see what they do.


92 posted on 04/02/2019 5:05:54 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Trump is the best project/program/portfolio manager in the world!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: conservative98

It isn’t.


97 posted on 04/02/2019 5:19:51 AM PDT by Baldwin77 (They hated Reagan too ! TRUMP TOUGH - AMERICA STRONG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: conservative98
How is this even legal?

The 10th and 12th Amendments say so. How the electors are chosen is up to the states.

99 posted on 04/02/2019 5:27:56 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: conservative98
How is this even legal?

The Constitution gives state legislatures wide latitude to decide how a state's EVs are awarded. This could very well survive a court challenge.


113 posted on 04/02/2019 6:49:50 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson