Posted on 08/16/2017 1:44:15 PM PDT by libstripper
The man accused of ramming his car into protesters in Charlottesville, Virginia, on Saturday seems to have already been found guilty by the media but there may be more to the story than is being reported.
* * *
A video posted on Streamable reveals that the driver of the Challenger had slowed down and was apparently calm, until protesters hit his vehicle with a blunt object such as a baseball bat or large flag pole.
(Excerpt) Read more at conservativetribune.com ...
A video of that bat attack on the rear of the car has been seen from day 1 and talked about, but the libs and media stooges ignore it.
you don’t understand....
The Antifa protesters have every right to commit violence against the evil ‘Alt-right’. The Driver should have just taken his beating. so saith the MSM/’Progressives’
He has a great defense, with video showing him being attacked
hmmm. no wonder the ENTIRE video didn’t seem to be shown on the fakenews...... another case of George Zimmerman type editing “He looks black” or in this case “the car sped into the crowd from a distance”
could that be WHY the air bag didn’t deploy? He really wasn’t going THAT fast?
It’s a flag swung like a bat-——it’s not a bat.
.
This fella’s trial ought to be REEEEEEAL interesting.
Look let’s deal with reality nobody needs a schizophrenic driving into a protest crowd at any speed, it’s ridiculous. His level of legal culpability is unclear but that was a reckless act.
There are just way too many things here that add up to a large pile of "reasonable doubt" evidence.
I have to give credit to Froedrick for this one:
"If da brake lights are lit, you must acquit!"
LMAO.
This may be another Zimmerman Martin situation. If you will remember everyone treated that as a Crazy Cop wannabe shooting a poor black Child In Cold Blood. That is until the facts came out. It’s going to be interesting to see how this plays out over the next couple of months.
To be clear, the leftist protestors should be held accountable for their actions. After the car hit the crowd, the leftists swarmed the car from behind, hitting the car with bats and other objects before getting run over when the car backed up. One young woman hitting the car from behind was run over when it backed up - she wouldn't have been hit if she were not attacking the car. Was she the one who died? You do stupid things, you can die.
Furthermore, having driven into a crowd when you get attacked you font have the right to floor it in reverse and kill people. Let’s get real.
He has already had a trial.
Why was he driving toward those people to begin with?
At this point, even if the guy is fully cleared, it won’t matter. The left and the faithless Republicans (just about all of them) will still have the knives out for President Trump. Fortunately he is a strong guy who is unlikely to give up.
I hope he considers running as an independent in 2020 — even if they impeach and convict him.
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Referencing figure 3, using the flag swingers proximity to the no parking sign and the position of the car as determined in figure 1, the distance from the front of the car to Flag Man in figure 2 is aprx 31 ft.
Referencing figure 2, Flag Man is four people deep into the scattering crowd
1. knapsack man
2. yellow shirt
3. sunglasses
4. bluejean legs
"baseball bat or large flag pole" - figure 3 shows a short flag pole
The man accused of ramming his car into protesters in Charlottesville, Virginia, on Saturday seems to have already been found guilty by the media
A Conviction without a Trial:Like the media always does.
Let’s all step back and be realistic. You don’t have a right to drive your car into the middle of a crowd at any speed. Any MV code will consider that reckless.
It might take a loooooong time to find a jury.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.