Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Referencing figure 3, using the flag swinger’s proximity to the no parking sign and the position of the car as determined in figure 1, the distance from the front of the car to “Flag Man” in figure 2 is aprx 31 ft.
Referencing figure 2, Flag Man is four people deep into the scattering crowd
1. knapsack man
2. yellow shirt
3. sunglasses
4. bluejean legs
"baseball bat or large flag pole" - figure 3 shows a short flag pole
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9mnywjPPDtU
Note the people flying through the air before the car becomes visible. Note the people flying through the air and striking the car in front of him. Note the people being thrown to the ground.
Note: NO BRAKE LIGHTS.
Gee, look at all the people standing around, watching
If he gunned it with intent to run over anarchists, then they would be running like hell, not standing there watching the assault against his vehicle
Let’s dispense with the nonsense that he rammed into the crowd with intent to kill. That’s anarchists’ fairy tale stuff
If anyone needs to be arrested, it’s “flagman.”
If the identified flag man in the in-front picture vs. behind picture is the very same man, he had enough time to raise his sunglasses to the top of his head before attacking the car. Belies a fast-moving vehicle narrative at least to that point.
WOW! That really puts things into perspective. It’s amazing that there’s no indication of the two cars that are almost right in front of him. The drone footage shows that the van and the white car behind are right at the stop sign and creeping through the crowd. What’s that like 20’ away for the Challenger ?!?!
This could be a case of hitting the accelerator instead of the brakes. He doesn’t immediately hit reverse either. Not until the crowd starts smashing windows does he quickly back out.
BFLR
That “flag pole” is a piece of metal pipe with a banner attached.
